Residents protest against Averies waste transfer

Protesters meeting at former park and ride site

Protesters meeting at former park and ride site

First published in News
Last updated
by , Reporter

RESIDENTS living near the former Groundwell park and ride site came together tonight to express their anger against plans to move waste from the Averies Recycling fire there.

Around 60 people protested against the plans which were announced on Wednesday. Around half of the non-hazardous waste from the Marshgate base will soon be moved to Swindon Council site owned to allow firefighters to deal with the fire faster.

The blaze has been going since July 21.

Firefighters are working with Averies, Swindon Council, NHS England, Wiltshire Police and the Environment Agency to deal with the incident.

Glynis Hales, who lives in Penhill, said: “This plan needs more thought as it was decided by a few individuals and not the full council. The feeling in Penhill is that the council think we are rubbish and that they’re happy to dump rubbish here. I know that might not be the case but that is the feeling.

“I do appreciate that the people living at Marshgate are suffering but the council shouldn’t make both areas suffer.”

Residents are concerned by the affect the waste could have on air quality, nearby water and the wildlife living around the park and ride site.

Nigel Fraser, who lives in Queensfield, said: “I feel bloody angry. It is a private business who the council are putting before residents who live here. I’ve been told the waste could be here for three months but who knows it could be even longer.”

Motorists beeped in support of the protesters who were waving banners which read ‘don’t dump waste on our community’ and ‘no fly-tipping’.

Some Swindon Councillors also went to the demonstration to give their backing to the residents.

Coun Joe Tray (Lab, Penhill and Upper Stratton), said: “I think this is such a fantastic turnout with just a couple of hours notice and shows the strength of feeling in this community.

“I understand the difficult issues this fire has created but to put the waste here is a knee-jerk reaction.”

Coun Mark Dempsey (Lab, Walcot and Park North), the North Swindon Parliamentary Candidate, said: “I think it is clear to see that the residents are very concerned about this. If the council do not listen to these people they will be making a huge error.

“The site is not designed or licensed for the storage of waste. I think the authorities should be looking to use a specialised site.”

As the park and ride compound is covered by trees, the authorities claim that the waste will be out of sight. All of the burnt waste will be fully extinguished and checked before being taken to the site. It will also be covered over to reduce any adverse smells.

In addition to the high perimeter fencing at the compound there will also be 24 hour security.

Once the Marshgate fire is put out the authorities aim to return the waste to Averies as soon as possible.

“Numerous sites have been considered and the former Groundwell Park & Ride is the least worst option. Unfortunately, nowhere would be popular with everyone and this site is safe and meets the necessary criteria agreed with partner agencies. Public safety is the number one priority and I can reassure residents that no waste which poses any danger to them will be transferred to the site,” Coun David Renard, Swindon Council Leader (Con, Haydon Wick), said.

“We appreciate this is a difficult situation and remain committed to putting the fire out as soon as possible so normality can resume for everyone. I would like to take this opportunity to thank residents for their understanding and co-operation. We are also liaising with anyone who has raised questions and concerns.”

Averies has repeatedly apologised for the issues that the fire has caused to Swindon’s residents and businesses. North Swindon MP Justin Tomlinson (Con) wants to see the Averies fire extinguished as quickly as possible.

He said: “Frankly, the Environment Agency should be forcing Averies’ insurance to pay for the safe storage of the waste. I’m disappointed that the agency isn’t using the full force of the law to bring this to a swift conclusion for the sake of local residents.”

Concerned residents can attend a meeting taking place at St Peter’s Church Hall, in Penhill, at 7pm tomorrow.

Comments (73)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

7:22pm Thu 7 Aug 14

there-their-they're says...

Fair enough the people of Penhill don't want the waste there but what about the people of Marshgate who have no choice?
'Averies have continually apologised for the fire and upset caused' .....have they? Where and how? I haven't seen or heard any apology from them, I've only seen it made reference to and they have A LOT to apologise for.
Why a rubbish dump was ever allowed in this cramped area surrounded by residential properties is beyond me. The same goes for the Cheney Manor site too. SBC and the environment agency should be sending them out of town.
Fair enough the people of Penhill don't want the waste there but what about the people of Marshgate who have no choice? 'Averies have continually apologised for the fire and upset caused' .....have they? Where and how? I haven't seen or heard any apology from them, I've only seen it made reference to and they have A LOT to apologise for. Why a rubbish dump was ever allowed in this cramped area surrounded by residential properties is beyond me. The same goes for the Cheney Manor site too. SBC and the environment agency should be sending them out of town. there-their-they're
  • Score: 24

7:54pm Thu 7 Aug 14

Moth says...

Averies have been warned several times but obviously took no heed. Why should the people of Marshgate, Penhill, Cricklade Road, Queensfield and no doubt Kingsdown have to suffer for Averies disregard of the law of the land?

It is Averies insurance who should pay for safe storage. I presume they do have insurance?

Justin Tomlinson, MP should be doing everything he can to stop this idiotic idea. May I remind him that there is a general election next year and he can just as easily be voted out as he was voted in.

If this proposal goes ahead, then I'm sure there are many people who have heart and lung problems whose health will be adversely affected.

Does Swindon Borough Council want a class lawsuit for damages?
Averies have been warned several times but obviously took no heed. Why should the people of Marshgate, Penhill, Cricklade Road, Queensfield and no doubt Kingsdown have to suffer for Averies disregard of the law of the land? It is Averies insurance who should pay for safe storage. I presume they do have insurance? Justin Tomlinson, MP should be doing everything he can to stop this idiotic idea. May I remind him that there is a general election next year and he can just as easily be voted out as he was voted in. If this proposal goes ahead, then I'm sure there are many people who have heart and lung problems whose health will be adversely affected. Does Swindon Borough Council want a class lawsuit for damages? Moth
  • Score: 12

8:22pm Thu 7 Aug 14

LordAshOfTheBrake says...

Why don't they just take it to Hills Waste site which is only a couple of miles further down the road.
Why don't they just take it to Hills Waste site which is only a couple of miles further down the road. LordAshOfTheBrake
  • Score: 13

8:24pm Thu 7 Aug 14

Davey Gravey says...

Fair play to the residents for putting up a fight. This situation is an utter disaster and the incompetence is unbelievable. Who is going to take responsibility for this? Where are the towns mp's when they are needed?
Fair play to the residents for putting up a fight. This situation is an utter disaster and the incompetence is unbelievable. Who is going to take responsibility for this? Where are the towns mp's when they are needed? Davey Gravey
  • Score: 18

8:48pm Thu 7 Aug 14

Ollie Dognacky says...

Swindon Borough Clownschool
Swindon Borough Clownschool Ollie Dognacky
  • Score: 15

9:04pm Thu 7 Aug 14

Sandor Clegane says...

It will make no difference out there.
If I had my way it would all be land fill.

People dont know whats good for them.
It will make no difference out there. If I had my way it would all be land fill. People dont know whats good for them. Sandor Clegane
  • Score: -21

9:26pm Thu 7 Aug 14

Davey Gravey says...

Sandor Clegane wrote:
It will make no difference out there.
If I had my way it would all be land fill.

People dont know whats good for them.
WTF?
[quote][p][bold]Sandor Clegane[/bold] wrote: It will make no difference out there. If I had my way it would all be land fill. People dont know whats good for them.[/p][/quote]WTF? Davey Gravey
  • Score: 8

9:33pm Thu 7 Aug 14

Sandor Clegane says...

Davey Gravey wrote:
Sandor Clegane wrote:
It will make no difference out there.
If I had my way it would all be land fill.

People dont know whats good for them.
WTF?
Council should have the right to make decisions for those that cant
[quote][p][bold]Davey Gravey[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Sandor Clegane[/bold] wrote: It will make no difference out there. If I had my way it would all be land fill. People dont know whats good for them.[/p][/quote]WTF?[/p][/quote]Council should have the right to make decisions for those that cant Sandor Clegane
  • Score: -25

10:02pm Thu 7 Aug 14

Ollie Dognacky says...

Spoken like an arrogant councillor
Spoken like an arrogant councillor Ollie Dognacky
  • Score: 9

10:06pm Thu 7 Aug 14

Ollie Dognacky says...

LordAshOfTheBrake wrote:
Why don't they just take it to Hills Waste site which is only a couple of miles further down the road.
......
Absolutely.
What is the point of moving waste more than once?.😳....
💩 Swindon Borough Clownschool in action 💩
[quote][p][bold]LordAshOfTheBrake[/bold] wrote: Why don't they just take it to Hills Waste site which is only a couple of miles further down the road.[/p][/quote]...... Absolutely. What is the point of moving waste more than once?.😳.... 💩 Swindon Borough Clownschool in action 💩 Ollie Dognacky
  • Score: 4

10:13pm Thu 7 Aug 14

yoreelsmyth10 says...

Hills are worse than Averies, remember the stench from their landfill site for months on end.
Hills are worse than Averies, remember the stench from their landfill site for months on end. yoreelsmyth10
  • Score: 10

10:14pm Thu 7 Aug 14

Sandor Clegane says...

All I am saying is that rather than the situation effect everyone we can confine it to areas that are already in need of redevelopment.
Its an opinion held by many just not brave enough to say it.

Constant councilor calls are just laughable.
All I am saying is that rather than the situation effect everyone we can confine it to areas that are already in need of redevelopment. Its an opinion held by many just not brave enough to say it. Constant councilor calls are just laughable. Sandor Clegane
  • Score: -14

10:18pm Thu 7 Aug 14

Sandor Clegane says...

Ollie Dognacky wrote:
Spoken like an arrogant councillor
I couldn't possibly comment
[quote][p][bold]Ollie Dognacky[/bold] wrote: Spoken like an arrogant councillor[/p][/quote]I couldn't possibly comment Sandor Clegane
  • Score: -13

10:21pm Thu 7 Aug 14

Ollie Dognacky says...

We know
We know Ollie Dognacky
  • Score: 6

10:29pm Thu 7 Aug 14

REDROM says...

Sandor Clegane wrote:
Davey Gravey wrote:
Sandor Clegane wrote:
It will make no difference out there.
If I had my way it would all be land fill.

People dont know whats good for them.
WTF?
Council should have the right to make decisions for those that cant
Blunsdon, Abbey Meads, Penhill, Stratton. to name a few, when did any of these have a say in this. The council can not make decisions full stop. and for those who like to differ then you I either deluded or your a councillor. If it is the latter then you'll be use to hearing your own bull $hit and have only convinced yourself that what spews out of your mouth is true,
[quote][p][bold]Sandor Clegane[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Davey Gravey[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Sandor Clegane[/bold] wrote: It will make no difference out there. If I had my way it would all be land fill. People dont know whats good for them.[/p][/quote]WTF?[/p][/quote]Council should have the right to make decisions for those that cant[/p][/quote]Blunsdon, Abbey Meads, Penhill, Stratton. to name a few, when did any of these have a say in this. The council can not make decisions full stop. and for those who like to differ then you I either deluded or your a councillor. If it is the latter then you'll be use to hearing your own bull $hit and have only convinced yourself that what spews out of your mouth is true, REDROM
  • Score: 13

10:30pm Thu 7 Aug 14

Robh says...

Is this waste still recyclable? If not why store it and not just dump it.
Is this waste still recyclable? If not why store it and not just dump it. Robh
  • Score: 7

10:40pm Thu 7 Aug 14

Ollie Dognacky says...

Robh wrote:
Is this waste still recyclable? If not why store it and not just dump it.
Exactly.
Just how determined are Swindon Borough Clownschool in demonstrating incompetence.
Move the waste ONCE to its' final disposal site.
Don't "sweep it under the mat" and cart it backwards and forwards.
Idiots 🙈
[quote][p][bold]Robh[/bold] wrote: Is this waste still recyclable? If not why store it and not just dump it.[/p][/quote]Exactly. Just how determined are Swindon Borough Clownschool in demonstrating incompetence. Move the waste ONCE to its' final disposal site. Don't "sweep it under the mat" and cart it backwards and forwards. Idiots 🙈 Ollie Dognacky
  • Score: 5

10:46pm Thu 7 Aug 14

Sandor Clegane says...

Robh wrote:
Is this waste still recyclable? If not why store it and not just dump it.
Its only ash now anyway.
Accuse all you want it no proof didnt happen.
Its a simple situation for the council they were voted in by you the general public so you have decided that they know how best to deal with the situation.
If the filth can be contained then why not.
[quote][p][bold]Robh[/bold] wrote: Is this waste still recyclable? If not why store it and not just dump it.[/p][/quote]Its only ash now anyway. Accuse all you want it no proof didnt happen. Its a simple situation for the council they were voted in by you the general public so you have decided that they know how best to deal with the situation. If the filth can be contained then why not. Sandor Clegane
  • Score: -15

10:48pm Thu 7 Aug 14

Waster1 says...

Who is paying for the cost of moving the waste? No doubt our council, ie. Us! Taking it to Hills means averies would have to pay to dispose of it. This is why the situation is as it is, because.they aren't paying to deal with correct disposal.
The deports keep referring to non-hazardous waste - is plasterboard considered non-hazardous? I don't think so and plasterboard was taken to this site
I thinkthe health of us all is at risk and it's about time the EA and the council grew a pair and dealt with this situation and averies properly. A complete and utter shambles!
Who is paying for the cost of moving the waste? No doubt our council, ie. Us! Taking it to Hills means averies would have to pay to dispose of it. This is why the situation is as it is, because.they aren't paying to deal with correct disposal. The deports keep referring to non-hazardous waste - is plasterboard considered non-hazardous? I don't think so and plasterboard was taken to this site I thinkthe health of us all is at risk and it's about time the EA and the council grew a pair and dealt with this situation and averies properly. A complete and utter shambles! Waster1
  • Score: 7

10:49pm Thu 7 Aug 14

Sandor Clegane says...

REDROM wrote:
Sandor Clegane wrote:
Davey Gravey wrote:
Sandor Clegane wrote:
It will make no difference out there.
If I had my way it would all be land fill.

People dont know whats good for them.
WTF?
Council should have the right to make decisions for those that cant
Blunsdon, Abbey Meads, Penhill, Stratton. to name a few, when did any of these have a say in this. The council can not make decisions full stop. and for those who like to differ then you I either deluded or your a councillor. If it is the latter then you'll be use to hearing your own bull $hit and have only convinced yourself that what spews out of your mouth is true,
Just a silly response I am sure residents will receive compensation for their homes. Those that own them anyway.
[quote][p][bold]REDROM[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Sandor Clegane[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Davey Gravey[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Sandor Clegane[/bold] wrote: It will make no difference out there. If I had my way it would all be land fill. People dont know whats good for them.[/p][/quote]WTF?[/p][/quote]Council should have the right to make decisions for those that cant[/p][/quote]Blunsdon, Abbey Meads, Penhill, Stratton. to name a few, when did any of these have a say in this. The council can not make decisions full stop. and for those who like to differ then you I either deluded or your a councillor. If it is the latter then you'll be use to hearing your own bull $hit and have only convinced yourself that what spews out of your mouth is true,[/p][/quote]Just a silly response I am sure residents will receive compensation for their homes. Those that own them anyway. Sandor Clegane
  • Score: -12

10:52pm Thu 7 Aug 14

Sandor Clegane says...

Waster1 wrote:
Who is paying for the cost of moving the waste? No doubt our council, ie. Us! Taking it to Hills means averies would have to pay to dispose of it. This is why the situation is as it is, because.they aren't paying to deal with correct disposal.
The deports keep referring to non-hazardous waste - is plasterboard considered non-hazardous? I don't think so and plasterboard was taken to this site
I thinkthe health of us all is at risk and it's about time the EA and the council grew a pair and dealt with this situation and averies properly. A complete and utter shambles!
If that is how you feel about it take it to court.
It will not win as no crime has been carried out.
[quote][p][bold]Waster1[/bold] wrote: Who is paying for the cost of moving the waste? No doubt our council, ie. Us! Taking it to Hills means averies would have to pay to dispose of it. This is why the situation is as it is, because.they aren't paying to deal with correct disposal. The deports keep referring to non-hazardous waste - is plasterboard considered non-hazardous? I don't think so and plasterboard was taken to this site I thinkthe health of us all is at risk and it's about time the EA and the council grew a pair and dealt with this situation and averies properly. A complete and utter shambles![/p][/quote]If that is how you feel about it take it to court. It will not win as no crime has been carried out. Sandor Clegane
  • Score: -10

10:58pm Thu 7 Aug 14

yoreelsmyth10 says...

Not sure Hills is the answer, aren't they a private company as well who can't be trusted. Maybe it needs to be dealt with by the council to make sure that it is dealt with properly.
Not sure Hills is the answer, aren't they a private company as well who can't be trusted. Maybe it needs to be dealt with by the council to make sure that it is dealt with properly. yoreelsmyth10
  • Score: 5

11:02pm Thu 7 Aug 14

Sandor Clegane says...

yoreelsmyth10 wrote:
Not sure Hills is the answer, aren't they a private company as well who can't be trusted. Maybe it needs to be dealt with by the council to make sure that it is dealt with properly.
Which is exactly what is happening.
[quote][p][bold]yoreelsmyth10[/bold] wrote: Not sure Hills is the answer, aren't they a private company as well who can't be trusted. Maybe it needs to be dealt with by the council to make sure that it is dealt with properly.[/p][/quote]Which is exactly what is happening. Sandor Clegane
  • Score: -4

11:22pm Thu 7 Aug 14

asimo says...

What a stink . . . over a load of old rubbish !

There is a clear solution here . . .dump it all at Oakbourne Park. There is plenty of vermin over that area judging by the postings regarding the disabled housing scheme " not in my back garden " brigade managed to stop happening. As for the public purse carrying the financial burden why doesn't the council claim off the Aviaries' public liability insurance ? I also think criminal proceedings should be brought against all responsible parties concerned which should include the HSE ,the Environmental Agency and Swindon Council for failing to deal with this whole affair. What a shocking, shameful lack of control and responsibilty by all concerned.
What a stink . . . over a load of old rubbish ! There is a clear solution here . . .dump it all at Oakbourne Park. There is plenty of vermin over that area judging by the postings regarding the disabled housing scheme " not in my back garden " brigade managed to stop happening. As for the public purse carrying the financial burden why doesn't the council claim off the Aviaries' public liability insurance ? I also think criminal proceedings should be brought against all responsible parties concerned which should include the HSE ,the Environmental Agency and Swindon Council for failing to deal with this whole affair. What a shocking, shameful lack of control and responsibilty by all concerned. asimo
  • Score: 12

11:32pm Thu 7 Aug 14

Moth says...

Sandor Clegane wrote:
All I am saying is that rather than the situation effect everyone we can confine it to areas that are already in need of redevelopment. Its an opinion held by many just not brave enough to say it. Constant councilor calls are just laughable.
Ah. Now I could read that as a slur against Penhill because it's a Council estate...but...the waste would be right on Queensfield's doorstep as well which is a private estate.

As for the Park & Ride. No-one wanted it in the first place but the then Labour council pushed through the plans. Everyone knew it would be a white elephant and it was. A gross waste of taxpayers money.

Now SBC don't know what to do with it despite one of the best suggestions being to turn it into a farmers market, something that would have benefitted the entire community of North Swindon. For whatever reason best known to themselves, SBC turned down that plan so the Park & Ride continues to deteriorate and sits there doing absolutely nothing. What a waste of potential revenue to the Council.

Putting this waste there (given that they do not know what's actually in the waste) could very possibly poison that land and everything else near it for years to come.

Whatever SBC decides to do with the Park & Ride both in the short and long terms needs to be looked at again but putting this waste there is not an option.

As I said in my previous post, let Averies insurers deal with it and move it to a safe place well away from residential areas.
[quote][p][bold]Sandor Clegane[/bold] wrote: All I am saying is that rather than the situation effect everyone we can confine it to areas that are already in need of redevelopment. Its an opinion held by many just not brave enough to say it. Constant councilor calls are just laughable.[/p][/quote]Ah. Now I could read that as a slur against Penhill because it's a Council estate...but...the waste would be right on Queensfield's doorstep as well which is a private estate. As for the Park & Ride. No-one wanted it in the first place but the then Labour council pushed through the plans. Everyone knew it would be a white elephant and it was. A gross waste of taxpayers money. Now SBC don't know what to do with it despite one of the best suggestions being to turn it into a farmers market, something that would have benefitted the entire community of North Swindon. For whatever reason best known to themselves, SBC turned down that plan so the Park & Ride continues to deteriorate and sits there doing absolutely nothing. What a waste of potential revenue to the Council. Putting this waste there (given that they do not know what's actually in the waste) could very possibly poison that land and everything else near it for years to come. Whatever SBC decides to do with the Park & Ride both in the short and long terms needs to be looked at again but putting this waste there is not an option. As I said in my previous post, let Averies insurers deal with it and move it to a safe place well away from residential areas. Moth
  • Score: 10

11:37pm Thu 7 Aug 14

Moth says...

Sandor Clegane wrote:
REDROM wrote:
Sandor Clegane wrote:
Davey Gravey wrote:
Sandor Clegane wrote: It will make no difference out there. If I had my way it would all be land fill. People dont know whats good for them.
WTF?
Council should have the right to make decisions for those that cant
Blunsdon, Abbey Meads, Penhill, Stratton. to name a few, when did any of these have a say in this. The council can not make decisions full stop. and for those who like to differ then you I either deluded or your a councillor. If it is the latter then you'll be use to hearing your own bull $hit and have only convinced yourself that what spews out of your mouth is true,
Just a silly response I am sure residents will receive compensation for their homes. Those that own them anyway.
Sandor. What good would compensation do when you're dying of, say Mesothelioma (that is lung cancer caused by asbestos). My friend just lost her husband recently to that disease. He suffered terribly and had a cruel and horrible death.

This isn't about us getting compensation because Council tenants would be entitled to it too but it has everything to do with our health and wellbeing.
[quote][p][bold]Sandor Clegane[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]REDROM[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Sandor Clegane[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Davey Gravey[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Sandor Clegane[/bold] wrote: It will make no difference out there. If I had my way it would all be land fill. People dont know whats good for them.[/p][/quote]WTF?[/p][/quote]Council should have the right to make decisions for those that cant[/p][/quote]Blunsdon, Abbey Meads, Penhill, Stratton. to name a few, when did any of these have a say in this. The council can not make decisions full stop. and for those who like to differ then you I either deluded or your a councillor. If it is the latter then you'll be use to hearing your own bull $hit and have only convinced yourself that what spews out of your mouth is true,[/p][/quote]Just a silly response I am sure residents will receive compensation for their homes. Those that own them anyway.[/p][/quote]Sandor. What good would compensation do when you're dying of, say Mesothelioma (that is lung cancer caused by asbestos). My friend just lost her husband recently to that disease. He suffered terribly and had a cruel and horrible death. This isn't about us getting compensation because Council tenants would be entitled to it too but it has everything to do with our health and wellbeing. Moth
  • Score: 2

11:52pm Thu 7 Aug 14

Sandor Clegane says...

Moth wrote:
Sandor Clegane wrote:
All I am saying is that rather than the situation effect everyone we can confine it to areas that are already in need of redevelopment. Its an opinion held by many just not brave enough to say it. Constant councilor calls are just laughable.
Ah. Now I could read that as a slur against Penhill because it's a Council estate...but...the waste would be right on Queensfield's doorstep as well which is a private estate.

As for the Park & Ride. No-one wanted it in the first place but the then Labour council pushed through the plans. Everyone knew it would be a white elephant and it was. A gross waste of taxpayers money.

Now SBC don't know what to do with it despite one of the best suggestions being to turn it into a farmers market, something that would have benefitted the entire community of North Swindon. For whatever reason best known to themselves, SBC turned down that plan so the Park & Ride continues to deteriorate and sits there doing absolutely nothing. What a waste of potential revenue to the Council.

Putting this waste there (given that they do not know what's actually in the waste) could very possibly poison that land and everything else near it for years to come.

Whatever SBC decides to do with the Park & Ride both in the short and long terms needs to be looked at again but putting this waste there is not an option.

As I said in my previous post, let Averies insurers deal with it and move it to a safe place well away from residential areas.
Farmers markets are very expensive and not practical for the area. The same farmers markets when on Wood st were asked to conform by the council and they refused. This was stopping the situation before it became a problem again.
[quote][p][bold]Moth[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Sandor Clegane[/bold] wrote: All I am saying is that rather than the situation effect everyone we can confine it to areas that are already in need of redevelopment. Its an opinion held by many just not brave enough to say it. Constant councilor calls are just laughable.[/p][/quote]Ah. Now I could read that as a slur against Penhill because it's a Council estate...but...the waste would be right on Queensfield's doorstep as well which is a private estate. As for the Park & Ride. No-one wanted it in the first place but the then Labour council pushed through the plans. Everyone knew it would be a white elephant and it was. A gross waste of taxpayers money. Now SBC don't know what to do with it despite one of the best suggestions being to turn it into a farmers market, something that would have benefitted the entire community of North Swindon. For whatever reason best known to themselves, SBC turned down that plan so the Park & Ride continues to deteriorate and sits there doing absolutely nothing. What a waste of potential revenue to the Council. Putting this waste there (given that they do not know what's actually in the waste) could very possibly poison that land and everything else near it for years to come. Whatever SBC decides to do with the Park & Ride both in the short and long terms needs to be looked at again but putting this waste there is not an option. As I said in my previous post, let Averies insurers deal with it and move it to a safe place well away from residential areas.[/p][/quote]Farmers markets are very expensive and not practical for the area. The same farmers markets when on Wood st were asked to conform by the council and they refused. This was stopping the situation before it became a problem again. Sandor Clegane
  • Score: -11

1:06am Fri 8 Aug 14

REDROM says...

Sandor Clegane wrote:
REDROM wrote:
Sandor Clegane wrote:
Davey Gravey wrote:
Sandor Clegane wrote:
It will make no difference out there.
If I had my way it would all be land fill.

People dont know whats good for them.
WTF?
Council should have the right to make decisions for those that cant
Blunsdon, Abbey Meads, Penhill, Stratton. to name a few, when did any of these have a say in this. The council can not make decisions full stop. and for those who like to differ then you I either deluded or your a councillor. If it is the latter then you'll be use to hearing your own bull $hit and have only convinced yourself that what spews out of your mouth is true,
Just a silly response I am sure residents will receive compensation for their homes. Those that own them anyway.
Got something against council tenants then I see, a human is a human. if they choose to smoke and ruin there health that's there call, having fumes or ash in the air is another matter. Last thing I heard Cricklade Rd where the former park and ride is situated is all privately owned,as is 90% of the surrounding properties. I don't really give a to55 about you, but I do give a to55 about everyday people 5/10 years down the line.
[quote][p][bold]Sandor Clegane[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]REDROM[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Sandor Clegane[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Davey Gravey[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Sandor Clegane[/bold] wrote: It will make no difference out there. If I had my way it would all be land fill. People dont know whats good for them.[/p][/quote]WTF?[/p][/quote]Council should have the right to make decisions for those that cant[/p][/quote]Blunsdon, Abbey Meads, Penhill, Stratton. to name a few, when did any of these have a say in this. The council can not make decisions full stop. and for those who like to differ then you I either deluded or your a councillor. If it is the latter then you'll be use to hearing your own bull $hit and have only convinced yourself that what spews out of your mouth is true,[/p][/quote]Just a silly response I am sure residents will receive compensation for their homes. Those that own them anyway.[/p][/quote]Got something against council tenants then I see, a human is a human. if they choose to smoke and ruin there health that's there call, having fumes or ash in the air is another matter. Last thing I heard Cricklade Rd where the former park and ride is situated is all privately owned,as is 90% of the surrounding properties. I don't really give a to55 about you, but I do give a to55 about everyday people 5/10 years down the line. REDROM
  • Score: 0

1:53am Fri 8 Aug 14

Big Time says...

What the dickens
What the dickens Big Time
  • Score: 0

8:56am Fri 8 Aug 14

Mappy says...

Regarding the Park and Ride, it's a complete fallacy that no one wanted it - it wasn't a matter of WANT so much as one of NEED, to reduce the effect of tons more traffic when Abbey Meads was built. One bus means up to 60 people out of their cars and off the road. From the first day it was used and usage grew over the first 6 months until it became very well used indeed. People were still saying it wasn't but you only had to go past to see it was. Of course, anyone under twenty won't even remember the countryside on Penhill's doorstep before then. If I remember correctly, it was built and paid for - and a couple of years bus subsidy by section 106 money - planning gain from developers over at Abbey Meads. It ran a very good service, every ten minutes or so, but of course it was mainly workers going to work and then coming back to fetch their cars, so the buses in between didn't get used so much. Incredible to believe, but true, that some very local people would take their cars there, pay the inclusive fee and take the bus to town and back, because it was cheaper than paying for car parking in town. It wasn't the wisest council decision to close it down, which they did probably because they ran out of planning gain money.
One hopes that common sense will reign and that it will eventually open again rather than spend billions on re-doing the Moonies roundabout, which is being talked about now.
Regarding the Park and Ride, it's a complete fallacy that no one wanted it - it wasn't a matter of WANT so much as one of NEED, to reduce the effect of tons more traffic when Abbey Meads was built. One bus means up to 60 people out of their cars and off the road. From the first day it was used and usage grew over the first 6 months until it became very well used indeed. People were still saying it wasn't but you only had to go past to see it was. Of course, anyone under twenty won't even remember the countryside on Penhill's doorstep before then. If I remember correctly, it was built and paid for - and a couple of years bus subsidy by section 106 money - planning gain from developers over at Abbey Meads. It ran a very good service, every ten minutes or so, but of course it was mainly workers going to work and then coming back to fetch their cars, so the buses in between didn't get used so much. Incredible to believe, but true, that some very local people would take their cars there, pay the inclusive fee and take the bus to town and back, because it was cheaper than paying for car parking in town. It wasn't the wisest council decision to close it down, which they did probably because they ran out of planning gain money. One hopes that common sense will reign and that it will eventually open again rather than spend billions on re-doing the Moonies roundabout, which is being talked about now. Mappy
  • Score: 10

9:01am Fri 8 Aug 14

Davey Gravey says...

Clegane all but admitting he is a councillor then. Showing contempt for people near groundwell in the process. On the sherberts last night I reckon.
Clegane all but admitting he is a councillor then. Showing contempt for people near groundwell in the process. On the sherberts last night I reckon. Davey Gravey
  • Score: 3

9:43am Fri 8 Aug 14

Synergie says...

channel IX blokey again innit
channel IX blokey again innit Synergie
  • Score: 2

9:51am Fri 8 Aug 14

Sandor Clegane says...

All the cloned posts have been reported.

Any idiot can tell the posting style isn't mine. Just some moron trying to get me banned and convince the other morons that I'm a councillor.

Sad.
All the cloned posts have been reported. Any idiot can tell the posting style isn't mine. Just some moron trying to get me banned and convince the other morons that I'm a councillor. Sad. Sandor Clegane
  • Score: 2

10:03am Fri 8 Aug 14

triago says...

Moth wrote:
Averies have been warned several times but obviously took no heed. Why should the people of Marshgate, Penhill, Cricklade Road, Queensfield and no doubt Kingsdown have to suffer for Averies disregard of the law of the land?

It is Averies insurance who should pay for safe storage. I presume they do have insurance?

Justin Tomlinson, MP should be doing everything he can to stop this idiotic idea. May I remind him that there is a general election next year and he can just as easily be voted out as he was voted in.

If this proposal goes ahead, then I'm sure there are many people who have heart and lung problems whose health will be adversely affected.

Does Swindon Borough Council want a class lawsuit for damages?
Not a lot of votes for Mr Tomlinson in Penhill so he doesn't care !
[quote][p][bold]Moth[/bold] wrote: Averies have been warned several times but obviously took no heed. Why should the people of Marshgate, Penhill, Cricklade Road, Queensfield and no doubt Kingsdown have to suffer for Averies disregard of the law of the land? It is Averies insurance who should pay for safe storage. I presume they do have insurance? Justin Tomlinson, MP should be doing everything he can to stop this idiotic idea. May I remind him that there is a general election next year and he can just as easily be voted out as he was voted in. If this proposal goes ahead, then I'm sure there are many people who have heart and lung problems whose health will be adversely affected. Does Swindon Borough Council want a class lawsuit for damages?[/p][/quote]Not a lot of votes for Mr Tomlinson in Penhill so he doesn't care ! triago
  • Score: 1

10:04am Fri 8 Aug 14

Sandor Clegane says...

By the way, the person who has cloned my account also uses the following accounts on here:

CllrDJGAZZAperky@Hay
denMaSS

Ollie Dognacky

All very obvious, just check their posting styles and adopted usernames, both based on actual councillors that they have a pathological hatred for (and he still thinks I'm one of them - the dullard).

What a miserable, boring life he must lead to even bother.

And what a shame, but no surprise, that the usual suspects fall for it. Pathetic.
By the way, the person who has cloned my account also uses the following accounts on here: CllrDJGAZZAperky@Hay denMaSS Ollie Dognacky All very obvious, just check their posting styles and adopted usernames, both based on actual councillors that they have a pathological hatred for (and he still thinks I'm one of them - the dullard). What a miserable, boring life he must lead to even bother. And what a shame, but no surprise, that the usual suspects fall for it. Pathetic. Sandor Clegane
  • Score: 4

10:09am Fri 8 Aug 14

Davey Gravey says...

Sandor Clegane wrote:
All the cloned posts have been reported.

Any idiot can tell the posting style isn't mine. Just some moron trying to get me banned and convince the other morons that I'm a councillor.

Sad.
Mmmmmm. Isn't it that you've sobered up and were horrified at your comments and have trotted out the old I've been cloned excuse again?
If someone cloned your account they would put that you were a councillor instead of dancing around the issue wouldn't they?
Don't you realize how you come across and continually going on about cloning etc etc 😉 judges, lefties, socialists?
[quote][p][bold]Sandor Clegane[/bold] wrote: All the cloned posts have been reported. Any idiot can tell the posting style isn't mine. Just some moron trying to get me banned and convince the other morons that I'm a councillor. Sad.[/p][/quote]Mmmmmm. Isn't it that you've sobered up and were horrified at your comments and have trotted out the old I've been cloned excuse again? If someone cloned your account they would put that you were a councillor instead of dancing around the issue wouldn't they? Don't you realize how you come across and continually going on about cloning etc etc 😉 judges, lefties, socialists? Davey Gravey
  • Score: -3

10:33am Fri 8 Aug 14

Sandor Clegane says...

Davey Gravey wrote:
Sandor Clegane wrote:
All the cloned posts have been reported.

Any idiot can tell the posting style isn't mine. Just some moron trying to get me banned and convince the other morons that I'm a councillor.

Sad.
Mmmmmm. Isn't it that you've sobered up and were horrified at your comments and have trotted out the old I've been cloned excuse again?
If someone cloned your account they would put that you were a councillor instead of dancing around the issue wouldn't they?
Don't you realize how you come across and continually going on about cloning etc etc 😉 judges, lefties, socialists?
No, it isn't that at all. As, I fully suspect, you well know.

The person who's cloned the account isn't completely stupid - they know I'm not a councillor.

Still, they've very easily pulled the wool over your eyes. Again.

Anyway, all reported to the Adver who will know exactly what's happened and who did it.
[quote][p][bold]Davey Gravey[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Sandor Clegane[/bold] wrote: All the cloned posts have been reported. Any idiot can tell the posting style isn't mine. Just some moron trying to get me banned and convince the other morons that I'm a councillor. Sad.[/p][/quote]Mmmmmm. Isn't it that you've sobered up and were horrified at your comments and have trotted out the old I've been cloned excuse again? If someone cloned your account they would put that you were a councillor instead of dancing around the issue wouldn't they? Don't you realize how you come across and continually going on about cloning etc etc 😉 judges, lefties, socialists?[/p][/quote]No, it isn't that at all. As, I fully suspect, you well know. The person who's cloned the account isn't completely stupid - they know I'm not a councillor. Still, they've very easily pulled the wool over your eyes. Again. Anyway, all reported to the Adver who will know exactly what's happened and who did it. Sandor Clegane
  • Score: 0

10:41am Fri 8 Aug 14

Davey Gravey says...

Sandor Clegane wrote:
Davey Gravey wrote:
Sandor Clegane wrote:
All the cloned posts have been reported.

Any idiot can tell the posting style isn't mine. Just some moron trying to get me banned and convince the other morons that I'm a councillor.

Sad.
Mmmmmm. Isn't it that you've sobered up and were horrified at your comments and have trotted out the old I've been cloned excuse again?
If someone cloned your account they would put that you were a councillor instead of dancing around the issue wouldn't they?
Don't you realize how you come across and continually going on about cloning etc etc 😉 judges, lefties, socialists?
No, it isn't that at all. As, I fully suspect, you well know.

The person who's cloned the account isn't completely stupid - they know I'm not a councillor.

Still, they've very easily pulled the wool over your eyes. Again.

Anyway, all reported to the Adver who will know exactly what's happened and who did it.
Have you reported yourself for creating yet another account after being banned as channelx?
[quote][p][bold]Sandor Clegane[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Davey Gravey[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Sandor Clegane[/bold] wrote: All the cloned posts have been reported. Any idiot can tell the posting style isn't mine. Just some moron trying to get me banned and convince the other morons that I'm a councillor. Sad.[/p][/quote]Mmmmmm. Isn't it that you've sobered up and were horrified at your comments and have trotted out the old I've been cloned excuse again? If someone cloned your account they would put that you were a councillor instead of dancing around the issue wouldn't they? Don't you realize how you come across and continually going on about cloning etc etc 😉 judges, lefties, socialists?[/p][/quote]No, it isn't that at all. As, I fully suspect, you well know. The person who's cloned the account isn't completely stupid - they know I'm not a councillor. Still, they've very easily pulled the wool over your eyes. Again. Anyway, all reported to the Adver who will know exactly what's happened and who did it.[/p][/quote]Have you reported yourself for creating yet another account after being banned as channelx? Davey Gravey
  • Score: 3

10:47am Fri 8 Aug 14

Sandor Clegane says...

Davey Gravey wrote:
Sandor Clegane wrote:
Davey Gravey wrote:
Sandor Clegane wrote:
All the cloned posts have been reported.

Any idiot can tell the posting style isn't mine. Just some moron trying to get me banned and convince the other morons that I'm a councillor.

Sad.
Mmmmmm. Isn't it that you've sobered up and were horrified at your comments and have trotted out the old I've been cloned excuse again?
If someone cloned your account they would put that you were a councillor instead of dancing around the issue wouldn't they?
Don't you realize how you come across and continually going on about cloning etc etc 😉 judges, lefties, socialists?
No, it isn't that at all. As, I fully suspect, you well know.

The person who's cloned the account isn't completely stupid - they know I'm not a councillor.

Still, they've very easily pulled the wool over your eyes. Again.

Anyway, all reported to the Adver who will know exactly what's happened and who did it.
Have you reported yourself for creating yet another account after being banned as channelx?
Having seen your appalling comments on the 'Rainbow event to take real pride in', I'd pipe down if I were you.
[quote][p][bold]Davey Gravey[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Sandor Clegane[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Davey Gravey[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Sandor Clegane[/bold] wrote: All the cloned posts have been reported. Any idiot can tell the posting style isn't mine. Just some moron trying to get me banned and convince the other morons that I'm a councillor. Sad.[/p][/quote]Mmmmmm. Isn't it that you've sobered up and were horrified at your comments and have trotted out the old I've been cloned excuse again? If someone cloned your account they would put that you were a councillor instead of dancing around the issue wouldn't they? Don't you realize how you come across and continually going on about cloning etc etc 😉 judges, lefties, socialists?[/p][/quote]No, it isn't that at all. As, I fully suspect, you well know. The person who's cloned the account isn't completely stupid - they know I'm not a councillor. Still, they've very easily pulled the wool over your eyes. Again. Anyway, all reported to the Adver who will know exactly what's happened and who did it.[/p][/quote]Have you reported yourself for creating yet another account after being banned as channelx?[/p][/quote]Having seen your appalling comments on the 'Rainbow event to take real pride in', I'd pipe down if I were you. Sandor Clegane
  • Score: 5

10:51am Fri 8 Aug 14

nato86 says...

Not being funny but hills didn't even know they transported a dead body to a sight out of Swindon how can we expect them to deal with this situation without messing up .....as for averies ..i used to work at the site in question it was horrific what had to go through there just to be paid lee was not a nice manager who didn't care for workers as he should .give you a pair of gloves and tells you to make them last 3days he has no thought for the safety or well being of any one on the site ..... And if people are worried about contamination of the stream/river at the side the amount of contamination that goes in there every time it rains it is unreal why has lee averies been left to pollute for so long. I was also threatened with violence by the man in question because i did not want to be injured or become ill and quit ,horrible person no business sense..
Not being funny but hills didn't even know they transported a dead body to a sight out of Swindon how can we expect them to deal with this situation without messing up .....as for averies ..i used to work at the site in question it was horrific what had to go through there just to be paid lee was not a nice manager who didn't care for workers as he should .give you a pair of gloves and tells you to make them last 3days he has no thought for the safety or well being of any one on the site ..... And if people are worried about contamination of the stream/river at the side the amount of contamination that goes in there every time it rains it is unreal why has lee averies been left to pollute for so long. I was also threatened with violence by the man in question because i did not want to be injured or become ill and quit ,horrible person no business sense.. nato86
  • Score: -4

10:55am Fri 8 Aug 14

nato86 says...

Cant you all just get along hahaha
Cant you all just get along hahaha nato86
  • Score: -1

11:00am Fri 8 Aug 14

Davey Gravey says...

nato86 wrote:
Cant you all just get along hahaha
Wouldn't be any fun not moaning and having a go at Clegane. It's all I have in my life so just let me enjoy it.
[quote][p][bold]nato86[/bold] wrote: Cant you all just get along hahaha[/p][/quote]Wouldn't be any fun not moaning and having a go at Clegane. It's all I have in my life so just let me enjoy it. Davey Gravey
  • Score: 5

11:03am Fri 8 Aug 14

Davey Gravey says...

Sandor Clegane wrote:
Davey Gravey wrote:
Sandor Clegane wrote:
Davey Gravey wrote:
Sandor Clegane wrote:
All the cloned posts have been reported.

Any idiot can tell the posting style isn't mine. Just some moron trying to get me banned and convince the other morons that I'm a councillor.

Sad.
Mmmmmm. Isn't it that you've sobered up and were horrified at your comments and have trotted out the old I've been cloned excuse again?
If someone cloned your account they would put that you were a councillor instead of dancing around the issue wouldn't they?
Don't you realize how you come across and continually going on about cloning etc etc 😉 judges, lefties, socialists?
No, it isn't that at all. As, I fully suspect, you well know.

The person who's cloned the account isn't completely stupid - they know I'm not a councillor.

Still, they've very easily pulled the wool over your eyes. Again.

Anyway, all reported to the Adver who will know exactly what's happened and who did it.
Have you reported yourself for creating yet another account after being banned as channelx?
Having seen your appalling comments on the 'Rainbow event to take real pride in', I'd pipe down if I were you.
All a matter of opinion channelx, ringer, Tim newroman, sandor clegane, etc,etc.
[quote][p][bold]Sandor Clegane[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Davey Gravey[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Sandor Clegane[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Davey Gravey[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Sandor Clegane[/bold] wrote: All the cloned posts have been reported. Any idiot can tell the posting style isn't mine. Just some moron trying to get me banned and convince the other morons that I'm a councillor. Sad.[/p][/quote]Mmmmmm. Isn't it that you've sobered up and were horrified at your comments and have trotted out the old I've been cloned excuse again? If someone cloned your account they would put that you were a councillor instead of dancing around the issue wouldn't they? Don't you realize how you come across and continually going on about cloning etc etc 😉 judges, lefties, socialists?[/p][/quote]No, it isn't that at all. As, I fully suspect, you well know. The person who's cloned the account isn't completely stupid - they know I'm not a councillor. Still, they've very easily pulled the wool over your eyes. Again. Anyway, all reported to the Adver who will know exactly what's happened and who did it.[/p][/quote]Have you reported yourself for creating yet another account after being banned as channelx?[/p][/quote]Having seen your appalling comments on the 'Rainbow event to take real pride in', I'd pipe down if I were you.[/p][/quote]All a matter of opinion channelx, ringer, Tim newroman, sandor clegane, etc,etc. Davey Gravey
  • Score: 2

11:08am Fri 8 Aug 14

Davey Gravey says...

Davey Gravey wrote:
nato86 wrote:
Cant you all just get along hahaha
Wouldn't be any fun not moaning and having a go at Clegane. It's all I have in my life so just let me enjoy it.
Ha ha. Very funny clegane.
Going to have to report you now for this and your other site abuses.
[quote][p][bold]Davey Gravey[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]nato86[/bold] wrote: Cant you all just get along hahaha[/p][/quote]Wouldn't be any fun not moaning and having a go at Clegane. It's all I have in my life so just let me enjoy it.[/p][/quote]Ha ha. Very funny clegane. Going to have to report you now for this and your other site abuses. Davey Gravey
  • Score: 2

11:08am Fri 8 Aug 14

nato86 says...

Davey Gravey wrote:
nato86 wrote:
Cant you all just get along hahaha
Wouldn't be any fun not moaning and having a go at Clegane. It's all I have in my life so just let me enjoy it.
Haha
[quote][p][bold]Davey Gravey[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]nato86[/bold] wrote: Cant you all just get along hahaha[/p][/quote]Wouldn't be any fun not moaning and having a go at Clegane. It's all I have in my life so just let me enjoy it.[/p][/quote]Haha nato86
  • Score: -1

11:08am Fri 8 Aug 14

nato86 says...

Davey Gravey wrote:
nato86 wrote:
Cant you all just get along hahaha
Wouldn't be any fun not moaning and having a go at Clegane. It's all I have in my life so just let me enjoy it.
Haha
[quote][p][bold]Davey Gravey[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]nato86[/bold] wrote: Cant you all just get along hahaha[/p][/quote]Wouldn't be any fun not moaning and having a go at Clegane. It's all I have in my life so just let me enjoy it.[/p][/quote]Haha nato86
  • Score: -1

11:09am Fri 8 Aug 14

Sandor Clegane says...

Davey Gravey wrote:
Sandor Clegane wrote:
Davey Gravey wrote:
Sandor Clegane wrote:
Davey Gravey wrote:
Sandor Clegane wrote:
All the cloned posts have been reported.

Any idiot can tell the posting style isn't mine. Just some moron trying to get me banned and convince the other morons that I'm a councillor.

Sad.
Mmmmmm. Isn't it that you've sobered up and were horrified at your comments and have trotted out the old I've been cloned excuse again?
If someone cloned your account they would put that you were a councillor instead of dancing around the issue wouldn't they?
Don't you realize how you come across and continually going on about cloning etc etc 😉 judges, lefties, socialists?
No, it isn't that at all. As, I fully suspect, you well know.

The person who's cloned the account isn't completely stupid - they know I'm not a councillor.

Still, they've very easily pulled the wool over your eyes. Again.

Anyway, all reported to the Adver who will know exactly what's happened and who did it.
Have you reported yourself for creating yet another account after being banned as channelx?
Having seen your appalling comments on the 'Rainbow event to take real pride in', I'd pipe down if I were you.
All a matter of opinion channelx, ringer, Tim newroman, sandor clegane, etc,etc.
Yes, we all know you don't like anyone to have an opinion but you - regardless of how objectionable your views are.

Anyway, today's nonsense ends here. I've reported the cloned posts and have told you the reality of the situation. You're too 'challenged' to ever understand it so there's little point boring everyone to death with your usual arguments.

You really must have nothing better to do with your days. Sad, really.
[quote][p][bold]Davey Gravey[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Sandor Clegane[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Davey Gravey[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Sandor Clegane[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Davey Gravey[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Sandor Clegane[/bold] wrote: All the cloned posts have been reported. Any idiot can tell the posting style isn't mine. Just some moron trying to get me banned and convince the other morons that I'm a councillor. Sad.[/p][/quote]Mmmmmm. Isn't it that you've sobered up and were horrified at your comments and have trotted out the old I've been cloned excuse again? If someone cloned your account they would put that you were a councillor instead of dancing around the issue wouldn't they? Don't you realize how you come across and continually going on about cloning etc etc 😉 judges, lefties, socialists?[/p][/quote]No, it isn't that at all. As, I fully suspect, you well know. The person who's cloned the account isn't completely stupid - they know I'm not a councillor. Still, they've very easily pulled the wool over your eyes. Again. Anyway, all reported to the Adver who will know exactly what's happened and who did it.[/p][/quote]Have you reported yourself for creating yet another account after being banned as channelx?[/p][/quote]Having seen your appalling comments on the 'Rainbow event to take real pride in', I'd pipe down if I were you.[/p][/quote]All a matter of opinion channelx, ringer, Tim newroman, sandor clegane, etc,etc.[/p][/quote]Yes, we all know you don't like anyone to have an opinion but you - regardless of how objectionable your views are. Anyway, today's nonsense ends here. I've reported the cloned posts and have told you the reality of the situation. You're too 'challenged' to ever understand it so there's little point boring everyone to death with your usual arguments. You really must have nothing better to do with your days. Sad, really. Sandor Clegane
  • Score: -2

11:12am Fri 8 Aug 14

Sandor Clegane says...

Davey Gravey wrote:
Davey Gravey wrote:
nato86 wrote:
Cant you all just get along hahaha
Wouldn't be any fun not moaning and having a go at Clegane. It's all I have in my life so just let me enjoy it.
Ha ha. Very funny clegane.
Going to have to report you now for this and your other site abuses.
Let's hope the Adver notes ALL of your continually goading posts about 'thumb fiddling' - which you've been warned about on numerous occasions but just can't help yourself.

You're very boring, Davey.
[quote][p][bold]Davey Gravey[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Davey Gravey[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]nato86[/bold] wrote: Cant you all just get along hahaha[/p][/quote]Wouldn't be any fun not moaning and having a go at Clegane. It's all I have in my life so just let me enjoy it.[/p][/quote]Ha ha. Very funny clegane. Going to have to report you now for this and your other site abuses.[/p][/quote]Let's hope the Adver notes ALL of your continually goading posts about 'thumb fiddling' - which you've been warned about on numerous occasions but just can't help yourself. You're very boring, Davey. Sandor Clegane
  • Score: -3

11:16am Fri 8 Aug 14

nato86 says...

Didums
Didums nato86
  • Score: -2

11:17am Fri 8 Aug 14

Davey Gravey says...

Grow up clegane. Soon for a ban I hope.
Plenty of evidence provided. Bye bye👎 ✋
Grow up clegane. Soon for a ban I hope. Plenty of evidence provided. Bye bye👎 ✋ Davey Gravey
  • Score: 2

11:39am Fri 8 Aug 14

Sandor Clegane says...

Davey Gravey wrote:
Grow up clegane. Soon for a ban I hope.
Plenty of evidence provided. Bye bye👎 ✋
You should certainly be banned, given you've ignored all the warnings you were given - and which were generous in themselves.

You continually start fights here and yet seem to think you're entirely blameless. It's actually quite weird.

Plenty of people have now called you out about your moaning, endless 'thumbs' nonsense. Enough's enough, time for Mr Gravey's nonsense to come to an end.

That's where I'll leave it with you, because I know only too well how happy you'd be to carry this drivel on ALLLLL day.
[quote][p][bold]Davey Gravey[/bold] wrote: Grow up clegane. Soon for a ban I hope. Plenty of evidence provided. Bye bye👎 ✋[/p][/quote]You should certainly be banned, given you've ignored all the warnings you were given - and which were generous in themselves. You continually start fights here and yet seem to think you're entirely blameless. It's actually quite weird. Plenty of people have now called you out about your moaning, endless 'thumbs' nonsense. Enough's enough, time for Mr Gravey's nonsense to come to an end. That's where I'll leave it with you, because I know only too well how happy you'd be to carry this drivel on ALLLLL day. Sandor Clegane
  • Score: 0

11:46am Fri 8 Aug 14

Davey Gravey says...

Sandor Clegane wrote:
Davey Gravey wrote:
Grow up clegane. Soon for a ban I hope.
Plenty of evidence provided. Bye bye👎 ✋
You should certainly be banned, given you've ignored all the warnings you were given - and which were generous in themselves.

You continually start fights here and yet seem to think you're entirely blameless. It's actually quite weird.

Plenty of people have now called you out about your moaning, endless 'thumbs' nonsense. Enough's enough, time for Mr Gravey's nonsense to come to an end.

That's where I'll leave it with you, because I know only too well how happy you'd be to carry this drivel on ALLLLL day.
I have had no warnings. I was asked to stop mentioning the thumbs which I agreed to as I thought the site moderator was going to sort things out. He banned you as channelx and then you came back as Sanford clegane and continued as before, hence why I started highlighting your abuse of the thumbs again. You've now hacked or cloned my account too. Once your ip address is tracked it will be curtains for you yet again. Why they don't just block you in that way I don't know?
The site comments are fine when you are not about.
[quote][p][bold]Sandor Clegane[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Davey Gravey[/bold] wrote: Grow up clegane. Soon for a ban I hope. Plenty of evidence provided. Bye bye👎 ✋[/p][/quote]You should certainly be banned, given you've ignored all the warnings you were given - and which were generous in themselves. You continually start fights here and yet seem to think you're entirely blameless. It's actually quite weird. Plenty of people have now called you out about your moaning, endless 'thumbs' nonsense. Enough's enough, time for Mr Gravey's nonsense to come to an end. That's where I'll leave it with you, because I know only too well how happy you'd be to carry this drivel on ALLLLL day.[/p][/quote]I have had no warnings. I was asked to stop mentioning the thumbs which I agreed to as I thought the site moderator was going to sort things out. He banned you as channelx and then you came back as Sanford clegane and continued as before, hence why I started highlighting your abuse of the thumbs again. You've now hacked or cloned my account too. Once your ip address is tracked it will be curtains for you yet again. Why they don't just block you in that way I don't know? The site comments are fine when you are not about. Davey Gravey
  • Score: 5

11:59am Fri 8 Aug 14

nato86 says...

Hahah you two need to get a room it is interesting though big congrats on taking the focus of of averies he should employ yous as a focus shifter hahahh
Hahah you two need to get a room it is interesting though big congrats on taking the focus of of averies he should employ yous as a focus shifter hahahh nato86
  • Score: -4

12:18pm Fri 8 Aug 14

messyits says...

Sandor Clegane says...If that is how you feel about it take it to court.
It will not win as no crime has been carried out.

Once again you make claims as to legal issues you know very little about as there are multiple routes to the courts on what could be life threatening fumes from a very wide range of waste products. One of the difficulties for all parties in the public sector being where and how toxic waste can be buried--the law and rules apply and penalties can be horrendous.
Sandor Clegane says...If that is how you feel about it take it to court. It will not win as no crime has been carried out. Once again you make claims as to legal issues you know very little about as there are multiple routes to the courts on what could be life threatening fumes from a very wide range of waste products. One of the difficulties for all parties in the public sector being where and how toxic waste can be buried--the law and rules apply and penalties can be horrendous. messyits
  • Score: 0

12:35pm Fri 8 Aug 14

messyits says...

This side argument is easily proved as a councillor has to declare interests and the council gives information as to committees and bodies councillors sit in on--a quick check leads to other searches that fit the person. That done--lodge a complaint to the correct investigating body which can gain access to evidence and deal with it.
This side argument is easily proved as a councillor has to declare interests and the council gives information as to committees and bodies councillors sit in on--a quick check leads to other searches that fit the person. That done--lodge a complaint to the correct investigating body which can gain access to evidence and deal with it. messyits
  • Score: 0

1:29pm Fri 8 Aug 14

house on the hill says...

Maybe its just the same person with multiple personalities (none of which are very nice!).
Maybe its just the same person with multiple personalities (none of which are very nice!). house on the hill
  • Score: 0

3:01pm Fri 8 Aug 14

Phantom Poster says...

Davey Gravey wrote:
Sandor Clegane wrote:
Davey Gravey wrote:
Grow up clegane. Soon for a ban I hope.
Plenty of evidence provided. Bye bye👎 ✋
You should certainly be banned, given you've ignored all the warnings you were given - and which were generous in themselves.

You continually start fights here and yet seem to think you're entirely blameless. It's actually quite weird.

Plenty of people have now called you out about your moaning, endless 'thumbs' nonsense. Enough's enough, time for Mr Gravey's nonsense to come to an end.

That's where I'll leave it with you, because I know only too well how happy you'd be to carry this drivel on ALLLLL day.
I have had no warnings. I was asked to stop mentioning the thumbs which I agreed to as I thought the site moderator was going to sort things out. He banned you as channelx and then you came back as Sanford clegane and continued as before, hence why I started highlighting your abuse of the thumbs again. You've now hacked or cloned my account too. Once your ip address is tracked it will be curtains for you yet again. Why they don't just block you in that way I don't know?
The site comments are fine when you are not about.
For once I agree with! You don't know the first thing about IP addresses and how they work.
[quote][p][bold]Davey Gravey[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Sandor Clegane[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Davey Gravey[/bold] wrote: Grow up clegane. Soon for a ban I hope. Plenty of evidence provided. Bye bye👎 ✋[/p][/quote]You should certainly be banned, given you've ignored all the warnings you were given - and which were generous in themselves. You continually start fights here and yet seem to think you're entirely blameless. It's actually quite weird. Plenty of people have now called you out about your moaning, endless 'thumbs' nonsense. Enough's enough, time for Mr Gravey's nonsense to come to an end. That's where I'll leave it with you, because I know only too well how happy you'd be to carry this drivel on ALLLLL day.[/p][/quote]I have had no warnings. I was asked to stop mentioning the thumbs which I agreed to as I thought the site moderator was going to sort things out. He banned you as channelx and then you came back as Sanford clegane and continued as before, hence why I started highlighting your abuse of the thumbs again. You've now hacked or cloned my account too. Once your ip address is tracked it will be curtains for you yet again. Why they don't just block you in that way I don't know? The site comments are fine when you are not about.[/p][/quote]For once I agree with! You don't know the first thing about IP addresses and how they work. Phantom Poster
  • Score: 0

4:48pm Fri 8 Aug 14

Moth says...

triago wrote:
Moth wrote:
Averies have been warned several times but obviously took no heed. Why should the people of Marshgate, Penhill, Cricklade Road, Queensfield and no doubt Kingsdown have to suffer for Averies disregard of the law of the land?

It is Averies insurance who should pay for safe storage. I presume they do have insurance?

Justin Tomlinson, MP should be doing everything he can to stop this idiotic idea. May I remind him that there is a general election next year and he can just as easily be voted out as he was voted in.

If this proposal goes ahead, then I'm sure there are many people who have heart and lung problems whose health will be adversely affected.

Does Swindon Borough Council want a class lawsuit for damages?
Not a lot of votes for Mr Tomlinson in Penhill so he doesn't care !
How would you know how many votes Mr Tomlinson got from Penhill? Certainly, he'd enough overall to be elected MP for the area. Not everyone who lives in a Council estate vote Labour. Personally, I wouldn't vote Lib/Lab/Con if I was paid to. All singing off the same self-serving hymn sheet.

However, this isn't about politics. It's about dumping potentially hazardous material very close to RESIDENTIAL areas which includes both Council and private houses.

It should be up to Averies insurers to sort out this mess and transport it to a safe site but, since it would seem that Averies have been warned by the EA several times, I wonder if their insurance is null and void thus forcing the Council to faff around trying to find somewhere for the waste.

Technically, it's not SBC's problem but if the insurance was null and void, then it would possibly become SBC's problem. Could explain why they've chosen undemocratically to use the Park & Ride.
[quote][p][bold]triago[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Moth[/bold] wrote: Averies have been warned several times but obviously took no heed. Why should the people of Marshgate, Penhill, Cricklade Road, Queensfield and no doubt Kingsdown have to suffer for Averies disregard of the law of the land? It is Averies insurance who should pay for safe storage. I presume they do have insurance? Justin Tomlinson, MP should be doing everything he can to stop this idiotic idea. May I remind him that there is a general election next year and he can just as easily be voted out as he was voted in. If this proposal goes ahead, then I'm sure there are many people who have heart and lung problems whose health will be adversely affected. Does Swindon Borough Council want a class lawsuit for damages?[/p][/quote]Not a lot of votes for Mr Tomlinson in Penhill so he doesn't care ![/p][/quote]How would you know how many votes Mr Tomlinson got from Penhill? Certainly, he'd enough overall to be elected MP for the area. Not everyone who lives in a Council estate vote Labour. Personally, I wouldn't vote Lib/Lab/Con if I was paid to. All singing off the same self-serving hymn sheet. However, this isn't about politics. It's about dumping potentially hazardous material very close to RESIDENTIAL areas which includes both Council and private houses. It should be up to Averies insurers to sort out this mess and transport it to a safe site but, since it would seem that Averies have been warned by the EA several times, I wonder if their insurance is null and void thus forcing the Council to faff around trying to find somewhere for the waste. Technically, it's not SBC's problem but if the insurance was null and void, then it would possibly become SBC's problem. Could explain why they've chosen undemocratically to use the Park & Ride. Moth
  • Score: 3

4:56pm Fri 8 Aug 14

Ollie Dognacky says...

The last time Sanford Clegane cloned MY account I asked the Adver to remove my account.
That left only the fake ID set up by Clegane (posting as ChannelX at the time).
Turns out he'd even set up an email account using MY real name.
The guy's a total wacko, sure to be banned AGAIN.
His latest plant to point accusations my way will fool nobody.
Previously I involved the law.
Hopefully this time the case will go further 👍
The last time Sanford Clegane cloned MY account I asked the Adver to remove my account. That left only the fake ID set up by Clegane (posting as ChannelX at the time). Turns out he'd even set up an email account using MY real name. The guy's a total wacko, sure to be banned AGAIN. His latest plant to point accusations my way will fool nobody. Previously I involved the law. Hopefully this time the case will go further 👍 Ollie Dognacky
  • Score: -2

5:06pm Fri 8 Aug 14

Badgersgetabadname says...

What the what???
I go away for a few days annnnnnd nothing seems to of changed.

Well done local residents for standing up and making themselves heard.
Surely this is akin to dumping? Is the site licensed for waste?
When similar waste was on the old college site didnt they have to spray it with water and use specialist equipment?

Either way this has been so badly handled by all concerned its a shameful page in the towns history.
No doubt the company will soon file as bankrupt which means they will escape fines.
What the what??? I go away for a few days annnnnnd nothing seems to of changed. Well done local residents for standing up and making themselves heard. Surely this is akin to dumping? Is the site licensed for waste? When similar waste was on the old college site didnt they have to spray it with water and use specialist equipment? Either way this has been so badly handled by all concerned its a shameful page in the towns history. No doubt the company will soon file as bankrupt which means they will escape fines. Badgersgetabadname
  • Score: -1

8:57am Sat 9 Aug 14

Badgersgetabadname says...

Ollie Dognacky wrote:
The last time Sanford Clegane cloned MY account I asked the Adver to remove my account.
That left only the fake ID set up by Clegane (posting as ChannelX at the time).
Turns out he'd even set up an email account using MY real name.
The guy's a total wacko, sure to be banned AGAIN.
His latest plant to point accusations my way will fool nobody.
Previously I involved the law.
Hopefully this time the case will go further 👍
As there is 4 threads discussing this and this is an older one being a little off topic should not matter.
Correct me if I am wrong but when a comment has been reported in the past and found to break T&C`s etc...Doesnt it get removed?

It does read as though someone had good night out though and maybe a couple too many?
Its like a child screaming for attention.
[quote][p][bold]Ollie Dognacky[/bold] wrote: The last time Sanford Clegane cloned MY account I asked the Adver to remove my account. That left only the fake ID set up by Clegane (posting as ChannelX at the time). Turns out he'd even set up an email account using MY real name. The guy's a total wacko, sure to be banned AGAIN. His latest plant to point accusations my way will fool nobody. Previously I involved the law. Hopefully this time the case will go further 👍[/p][/quote]As there is 4 threads discussing this and this is an older one being a little off topic should not matter. Correct me if I am wrong but when a comment has been reported in the past and found to break T&C`s etc...Doesnt it get removed? It does read as though someone had good night out though and maybe a couple too many? Its like a child screaming for attention. Badgersgetabadname
  • Score: 0

10:58am Sat 9 Aug 14

Ollie Dognacky says...

Correct.
In the incident I was referring to, the former ChannelX tried to impersonate me and also give the impression that I condone people taking drugs whilst driving.
So whilst not obviously breaking Ts & Cs, he was attempting to incite hatred etc.
He likes to eke out some of my personal details from time to time also.
He really needs medical help and possibly a restraining order
Correct. In the incident I was referring to, the former ChannelX tried to impersonate me and also give the impression that I condone people taking drugs whilst driving. So whilst not obviously breaking Ts & Cs, he was attempting to incite hatred etc. He likes to eke out some of my personal details from time to time also. He really needs medical help and possibly a restraining order Ollie Dognacky
  • Score: -1

12:37pm Sat 9 Aug 14

Badgersgetabadname says...

Ollie Dognacky wrote:
Correct.
In the incident I was referring to, the former ChannelX tried to impersonate me and also give the impression that I condone people taking drugs whilst driving.
So whilst not obviously breaking Ts & Cs, he was attempting to incite hatred etc.
He likes to eke out some of my personal details from time to time also.
He really needs medical help and possibly a restraining order
So he did make all those comments?
FFS some of it was pretty nasty even for him.
I posted a link to use which bans IP`s for free.
It cant be that difficult to do surely???
Just seems to make the whole comments section rather pointless when one person attempts to swing points by claiming to be multiple people?

How can someone whos job role must list being socially responsible be so vile and twisted?
I have had a look into history online and I didnt see anything that would suggest being effected by events or has had anything negative happen in lifetime to make so bitter??
We all have different triggers so maybe its a childhood thing.
I tried to explain this to a couple of friends...Then I gave up as its just mental.
[quote][p][bold]Ollie Dognacky[/bold] wrote: Correct. In the incident I was referring to, the former ChannelX tried to impersonate me and also give the impression that I condone people taking drugs whilst driving. So whilst not obviously breaking Ts & Cs, he was attempting to incite hatred etc. He likes to eke out some of my personal details from time to time also. He really needs medical help and possibly a restraining order[/p][/quote]So he did make all those comments? FFS some of it was pretty nasty even for him. I posted a link to use which bans IP`s for free. It cant be that difficult to do surely??? Just seems to make the whole comments section rather pointless when one person attempts to swing points by claiming to be multiple people? How can someone whos job role must list being socially responsible be so vile and twisted? I have had a look into history online and I didnt see anything that would suggest being effected by events or has had anything negative happen in lifetime to make so bitter?? We all have different triggers so maybe its a childhood thing. I tried to explain this to a couple of friends...Then I gave up as its just mental. Badgersgetabadname
  • Score: 0

9:15am Sun 10 Aug 14

Ollie Dognacky says...

Likewise.
I tell friends that I have a stalker.
I gave up trying to figure out what he hopes to achieve long ago when he was banned from Talk Swindon.
To insult people, call them lefties, threaten to drive them away with "robust treatment" just because the comment about SBCs ineptitude is somewhat bizarre.
My conclusion is that he is a political extremist with no social life or empathy for others.
Again, what he hopes to achieve on these threads????? Who knows?
Likewise. I tell friends that I have a stalker. I gave up trying to figure out what he hopes to achieve long ago when he was banned from Talk Swindon. To insult people, call them lefties, threaten to drive them away with "robust treatment" just because the comment about SBCs ineptitude is somewhat bizarre. My conclusion is that he is a political extremist with no social life or empathy for others. Again, what he hopes to achieve on these threads????? Who knows? Ollie Dognacky
  • Score: -1

10:26am Sun 10 Aug 14

Badgersgetabadname says...

Ollie Dognacky wrote:
Likewise.
I tell friends that I have a stalker.
I gave up trying to figure out what he hopes to achieve long ago when he was banned from Talk Swindon.
To insult people, call them lefties, threaten to drive them away with "robust treatment" just because the comment about SBCs ineptitude is somewhat bizarre.
My conclusion is that he is a political extremist with no social life or empathy for others.
Again, what he hopes to achieve on these threads????? Who knows?
With no disrespect to the Adver surely the message wouldnt reach enough people even if he was convincing.

Due to work commitments I am in and out of Swindon didnt he say protesters should be machine gunned?
[quote][p][bold]Ollie Dognacky[/bold] wrote: Likewise. I tell friends that I have a stalker. I gave up trying to figure out what he hopes to achieve long ago when he was banned from Talk Swindon. To insult people, call them lefties, threaten to drive them away with "robust treatment" just because the comment about SBCs ineptitude is somewhat bizarre. My conclusion is that he is a political extremist with no social life or empathy for others. Again, what he hopes to achieve on these threads????? Who knows?[/p][/quote]With no disrespect to the Adver surely the message wouldnt reach enough people even if he was convincing. Due to work commitments I am in and out of Swindon didnt he say protesters should be machine gunned? Badgersgetabadname
  • Score: -1

10:35am Sun 10 Aug 14

Ollie Dognacky says...

Exactly.
All he will achieve is to prevent floating voters like myself from voting Tory.
I have pointed The Adver to the sections on Talk Swindon, that catalogue his activities over the years, so it baffles me that people still have to tolerate the nonsense.
I know of many people that have stopped reading and commenting as a result of his exploits.
Exactly. All he will achieve is to prevent floating voters like myself from voting Tory. I have pointed The Adver to the sections on Talk Swindon, that catalogue his activities over the years, so it baffles me that people still have to tolerate the nonsense. I know of many people that have stopped reading and commenting as a result of his exploits. Ollie Dognacky
  • Score: -2

6:40pm Sun 10 Aug 14

Phantom Poster says...

Badgersgetabadname wrote:
Ollie Dognacky wrote:
Correct.
In the incident I was referring to, the former ChannelX tried to impersonate me and also give the impression that I condone people taking drugs whilst driving.
So whilst not obviously breaking Ts & Cs, he was attempting to incite hatred etc.
He likes to eke out some of my personal details from time to time also.
He really needs medical help and possibly a restraining order
So he did make all those comments?
FFS some of it was pretty nasty even for him.
I posted a link to use which bans IP`s for free.
It cant be that difficult to do surely???
Just seems to make the whole comments section rather pointless when one person attempts to swing points by claiming to be multiple people?

How can someone whos job role must list being socially responsible be so vile and twisted?
I have had a look into history online and I didnt see anything that would suggest being effected by events or has had anything negative happen in lifetime to make so bitter??
We all have different triggers so maybe its a childhood thing.
I tried to explain this to a couple of friends...Then I gave up as its just mental.
Blocking an IP address is trivially simple, however an IP address doesn't necessarily identify a user. Company firewalls, proxy servers etc. result in multiple users sharing the same IP address. There's also no guarantee that someones ISP will always allocate a user the same IP address.

If the person you are offended by worked at say Nationwide and posts while at work, do you think that their IP should be blocked and as a result, no other Nationwide employee be allowed to post?
[quote][p][bold]Badgersgetabadname[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Ollie Dognacky[/bold] wrote: Correct. In the incident I was referring to, the former ChannelX tried to impersonate me and also give the impression that I condone people taking drugs whilst driving. So whilst not obviously breaking Ts & Cs, he was attempting to incite hatred etc. He likes to eke out some of my personal details from time to time also. He really needs medical help and possibly a restraining order[/p][/quote]So he did make all those comments? FFS some of it was pretty nasty even for him. I posted a link to use which bans IP`s for free. It cant be that difficult to do surely??? Just seems to make the whole comments section rather pointless when one person attempts to swing points by claiming to be multiple people? How can someone whos job role must list being socially responsible be so vile and twisted? I have had a look into history online and I didnt see anything that would suggest being effected by events or has had anything negative happen in lifetime to make so bitter?? We all have different triggers so maybe its a childhood thing. I tried to explain this to a couple of friends...Then I gave up as its just mental.[/p][/quote]Blocking an IP address is trivially simple, however an IP address doesn't necessarily identify a user. Company firewalls, proxy servers etc. result in multiple users sharing the same IP address. There's also no guarantee that someones ISP will always allocate a user the same IP address. If the person you are offended by worked at say Nationwide and posts while at work, do you think that their IP should be blocked and as a result, no other Nationwide employee be allowed to post? Phantom Poster
  • Score: 0

8:36pm Sun 10 Aug 14

Badgersgetabadname says...

Phantom Poster wrote:
Badgersgetabadname wrote:
Ollie Dognacky wrote:
Correct.
In the incident I was referring to, the former ChannelX tried to impersonate me and also give the impression that I condone people taking drugs whilst driving.
So whilst not obviously breaking Ts & Cs, he was attempting to incite hatred etc.
He likes to eke out some of my personal details from time to time also.
He really needs medical help and possibly a restraining order
So he did make all those comments?
FFS some of it was pretty nasty even for him.
I posted a link to use which bans IP`s for free.
It cant be that difficult to do surely???
Just seems to make the whole comments section rather pointless when one person attempts to swing points by claiming to be multiple people?

How can someone whos job role must list being socially responsible be so vile and twisted?
I have had a look into history online and I didnt see anything that would suggest being effected by events or has had anything negative happen in lifetime to make so bitter??
We all have different triggers so maybe its a childhood thing.
I tried to explain this to a couple of friends...Then I gave up as its just mental.
Blocking an IP address is trivially simple, however an IP address doesn't necessarily identify a user. Company firewalls, proxy servers etc. result in multiple users sharing the same IP address. There's also no guarantee that someones ISP will always allocate a user the same IP address.

If the person you are offended by worked at say Nationwide and posts while at work, do you think that their IP should be blocked and as a result, no other Nationwide employee be allowed to post?
IT isnt really my thing which was why I posted the first one I found and was also the reason I posted it as a question here.
I dont think Nationwide pay people to sit on local websites.

Thank you for your insight.
[quote][p][bold]Phantom Poster[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Badgersgetabadname[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Ollie Dognacky[/bold] wrote: Correct. In the incident I was referring to, the former ChannelX tried to impersonate me and also give the impression that I condone people taking drugs whilst driving. So whilst not obviously breaking Ts & Cs, he was attempting to incite hatred etc. He likes to eke out some of my personal details from time to time also. He really needs medical help and possibly a restraining order[/p][/quote]So he did make all those comments? FFS some of it was pretty nasty even for him. I posted a link to use which bans IP`s for free. It cant be that difficult to do surely??? Just seems to make the whole comments section rather pointless when one person attempts to swing points by claiming to be multiple people? How can someone whos job role must list being socially responsible be so vile and twisted? I have had a look into history online and I didnt see anything that would suggest being effected by events or has had anything negative happen in lifetime to make so bitter?? We all have different triggers so maybe its a childhood thing. I tried to explain this to a couple of friends...Then I gave up as its just mental.[/p][/quote]Blocking an IP address is trivially simple, however an IP address doesn't necessarily identify a user. Company firewalls, proxy servers etc. result in multiple users sharing the same IP address. There's also no guarantee that someones ISP will always allocate a user the same IP address. If the person you are offended by worked at say Nationwide and posts while at work, do you think that their IP should be blocked and as a result, no other Nationwide employee be allowed to post?[/p][/quote]IT isnt really my thing which was why I posted the first one I found and was also the reason I posted it as a question here. I dont think Nationwide pay people to sit on local websites. Thank you for your insight. Badgersgetabadname
  • Score: 0

8:49pm Sun 10 Aug 14

Phantom Poster says...

Badgersgetabadname wrote:
Phantom Poster wrote:
Badgersgetabadname wrote:
Ollie Dognacky wrote:
Correct.
In the incident I was referring to, the former ChannelX tried to impersonate me and also give the impression that I condone people taking drugs whilst driving.
So whilst not obviously breaking Ts & Cs, he was attempting to incite hatred etc.
He likes to eke out some of my personal details from time to time also.
He really needs medical help and possibly a restraining order
So he did make all those comments?
FFS some of it was pretty nasty even for him.
I posted a link to use which bans IP`s for free.
It cant be that difficult to do surely???
Just seems to make the whole comments section rather pointless when one person attempts to swing points by claiming to be multiple people?

How can someone whos job role must list being socially responsible be so vile and twisted?
I have had a look into history online and I didnt see anything that would suggest being effected by events or has had anything negative happen in lifetime to make so bitter??
We all have different triggers so maybe its a childhood thing.
I tried to explain this to a couple of friends...Then I gave up as its just mental.
Blocking an IP address is trivially simple, however an IP address doesn't necessarily identify a user. Company firewalls, proxy servers etc. result in multiple users sharing the same IP address. There's also no guarantee that someones ISP will always allocate a user the same IP address.

If the person you are offended by worked at say Nationwide and posts while at work, do you think that their IP should be blocked and as a result, no other Nationwide employee be allowed to post?
IT isnt really my thing which was why I posted the first one I found and was also the reason I posted it as a question here.
I dont think Nationwide pay people to sit on local websites.

Thank you for your insight.
Oh for gods sake! Nationwide was just an example of a large local employer which I picked at random. Argh! - extreme face-slap!

I think you will find it extremely unusual that any large employer would block internet access to a web site such as the Adver. I've certainly never worked for one who does.

You just can't use the simplistic idea of blocking IP addresses here there and everywhere! So please stop suggesting that the Adver is being incompetent for not doing so!
[quote][p][bold]Badgersgetabadname[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Phantom Poster[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Badgersgetabadname[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Ollie Dognacky[/bold] wrote: Correct. In the incident I was referring to, the former ChannelX tried to impersonate me and also give the impression that I condone people taking drugs whilst driving. So whilst not obviously breaking Ts & Cs, he was attempting to incite hatred etc. He likes to eke out some of my personal details from time to time also. He really needs medical help and possibly a restraining order[/p][/quote]So he did make all those comments? FFS some of it was pretty nasty even for him. I posted a link to use which bans IP`s for free. It cant be that difficult to do surely??? Just seems to make the whole comments section rather pointless when one person attempts to swing points by claiming to be multiple people? How can someone whos job role must list being socially responsible be so vile and twisted? I have had a look into history online and I didnt see anything that would suggest being effected by events or has had anything negative happen in lifetime to make so bitter?? We all have different triggers so maybe its a childhood thing. I tried to explain this to a couple of friends...Then I gave up as its just mental.[/p][/quote]Blocking an IP address is trivially simple, however an IP address doesn't necessarily identify a user. Company firewalls, proxy servers etc. result in multiple users sharing the same IP address. There's also no guarantee that someones ISP will always allocate a user the same IP address. If the person you are offended by worked at say Nationwide and posts while at work, do you think that their IP should be blocked and as a result, no other Nationwide employee be allowed to post?[/p][/quote]IT isnt really my thing which was why I posted the first one I found and was also the reason I posted it as a question here. I dont think Nationwide pay people to sit on local websites. Thank you for your insight.[/p][/quote]Oh for gods sake! Nationwide was just an example of a large local employer which I picked at random. Argh! - extreme face-slap! I think you will find it extremely unusual that any large employer would block internet access to a web site such as the Adver. I've certainly never worked for one who does. You just can't use the simplistic idea of blocking IP addresses here there and everywhere! So please stop suggesting that the Adver is being incompetent for not doing so! Phantom Poster
  • Score: 0

8:57pm Sun 10 Aug 14

Badgersgetabadname says...

Phantom Poster wrote:
Badgersgetabadname wrote:
Phantom Poster wrote:
Badgersgetabadname wrote:
Ollie Dognacky wrote:
Correct.
In the incident I was referring to, the former ChannelX tried to impersonate me and also give the impression that I condone people taking drugs whilst driving.
So whilst not obviously breaking Ts & Cs, he was attempting to incite hatred etc.
He likes to eke out some of my personal details from time to time also.
He really needs medical help and possibly a restraining order
So he did make all those comments?
FFS some of it was pretty nasty even for him.
I posted a link to use which bans IP`s for free.
It cant be that difficult to do surely???
Just seems to make the whole comments section rather pointless when one person attempts to swing points by claiming to be multiple people?

How can someone whos job role must list being socially responsible be so vile and twisted?
I have had a look into history online and I didnt see anything that would suggest being effected by events or has had anything negative happen in lifetime to make so bitter??
We all have different triggers so maybe its a childhood thing.
I tried to explain this to a couple of friends...Then I gave up as its just mental.
Blocking an IP address is trivially simple, however an IP address doesn't necessarily identify a user. Company firewalls, proxy servers etc. result in multiple users sharing the same IP address. There's also no guarantee that someones ISP will always allocate a user the same IP address.

If the person you are offended by worked at say Nationwide and posts while at work, do you think that their IP should be blocked and as a result, no other Nationwide employee be allowed to post?
IT isnt really my thing which was why I posted the first one I found and was also the reason I posted it as a question here.
I dont think Nationwide pay people to sit on local websites.

Thank you for your insight.
Oh for gods sake! Nationwide was just an example of a large local employer which I picked at random. Argh! - extreme face-slap!

I think you will find it extremely unusual that any large employer would block internet access to a web site such as the Adver. I've certainly never worked for one who does.

You just can't use the simplistic idea of blocking IP addresses here there and everywhere! So please stop suggesting that the Adver is being incompetent for not doing so!
No, as I thought I had typed IT is not my thing so I asked it as a question.
Had a feeling you would jump up and down at that lol.

Now who is being silly where or when did I suggest anyone was incompetent?
Pretty sure all of my IT related comments were questions.
I said X etc was a moron but that is a different matter.

Strange comment to pick to have a go over when I have posted far stranger things.
[quote][p][bold]Phantom Poster[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Badgersgetabadname[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Phantom Poster[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Badgersgetabadname[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Ollie Dognacky[/bold] wrote: Correct. In the incident I was referring to, the former ChannelX tried to impersonate me and also give the impression that I condone people taking drugs whilst driving. So whilst not obviously breaking Ts & Cs, he was attempting to incite hatred etc. He likes to eke out some of my personal details from time to time also. He really needs medical help and possibly a restraining order[/p][/quote]So he did make all those comments? FFS some of it was pretty nasty even for him. I posted a link to use which bans IP`s for free. It cant be that difficult to do surely??? Just seems to make the whole comments section rather pointless when one person attempts to swing points by claiming to be multiple people? How can someone whos job role must list being socially responsible be so vile and twisted? I have had a look into history online and I didnt see anything that would suggest being effected by events or has had anything negative happen in lifetime to make so bitter?? We all have different triggers so maybe its a childhood thing. I tried to explain this to a couple of friends...Then I gave up as its just mental.[/p][/quote]Blocking an IP address is trivially simple, however an IP address doesn't necessarily identify a user. Company firewalls, proxy servers etc. result in multiple users sharing the same IP address. There's also no guarantee that someones ISP will always allocate a user the same IP address. If the person you are offended by worked at say Nationwide and posts while at work, do you think that their IP should be blocked and as a result, no other Nationwide employee be allowed to post?[/p][/quote]IT isnt really my thing which was why I posted the first one I found and was also the reason I posted it as a question here. I dont think Nationwide pay people to sit on local websites. Thank you for your insight.[/p][/quote]Oh for gods sake! Nationwide was just an example of a large local employer which I picked at random. Argh! - extreme face-slap! I think you will find it extremely unusual that any large employer would block internet access to a web site such as the Adver. I've certainly never worked for one who does. You just can't use the simplistic idea of blocking IP addresses here there and everywhere! So please stop suggesting that the Adver is being incompetent for not doing so![/p][/quote]No, as I thought I had typed IT is not my thing so I asked it as a question. Had a feeling you would jump up and down at that lol. Now who is being silly where or when did I suggest anyone was incompetent? Pretty sure all of my IT related comments were questions. I said X etc was a moron but that is a different matter. Strange comment to pick to have a go over when I have posted far stranger things. Badgersgetabadname
  • Score: 0

9:17pm Sun 10 Aug 14

Phantom Poster says...

Badgersgetabadname wrote:
Phantom Poster wrote:
Badgersgetabadname wrote:
Phantom Poster wrote:
Badgersgetabadname wrote:
Ollie Dognacky wrote:
Correct.
In the incident I was referring to, the former ChannelX tried to impersonate me and also give the impression that I condone people taking drugs whilst driving.
So whilst not obviously breaking Ts & Cs, he was attempting to incite hatred etc.
He likes to eke out some of my personal details from time to time also.
He really needs medical help and possibly a restraining order
So he did make all those comments?
FFS some of it was pretty nasty even for him.
I posted a link to use which bans IP`s for free.
It cant be that difficult to do surely???
Just seems to make the whole comments section rather pointless when one person attempts to swing points by claiming to be multiple people?

How can someone whos job role must list being socially responsible be so vile and twisted?
I have had a look into history online and I didnt see anything that would suggest being effected by events or has had anything negative happen in lifetime to make so bitter??
We all have different triggers so maybe its a childhood thing.
I tried to explain this to a couple of friends...Then I gave up as its just mental.
Blocking an IP address is trivially simple, however an IP address doesn't necessarily identify a user. Company firewalls, proxy servers etc. result in multiple users sharing the same IP address. There's also no guarantee that someones ISP will always allocate a user the same IP address.

If the person you are offended by worked at say Nationwide and posts while at work, do you think that their IP should be blocked and as a result, no other Nationwide employee be allowed to post?
IT isnt really my thing which was why I posted the first one I found and was also the reason I posted it as a question here.
I dont think Nationwide pay people to sit on local websites.

Thank you for your insight.
Oh for gods sake! Nationwide was just an example of a large local employer which I picked at random. Argh! - extreme face-slap!

I think you will find it extremely unusual that any large employer would block internet access to a web site such as the Adver. I've certainly never worked for one who does.

You just can't use the simplistic idea of blocking IP addresses here there and everywhere! So please stop suggesting that the Adver is being incompetent for not doing so!
No, as I thought I had typed IT is not my thing so I asked it as a question.
Had a feeling you would jump up and down at that lol.

Now who is being silly where or when did I suggest anyone was incompetent?
Pretty sure all of my IT related comments were questions.
I said X etc was a moron but that is a different matter.

Strange comment to pick to have a go over when I have posted far stranger things.
Sorry, it probably wasn't you - I think it may have been Davey Gravey who said that he couldn't understand why the Adver didn't just block Channel X's IP address.

Why on earth are people so worked up about this? It's an anonymous posting forum, which will result in exactly the same behaviour as those elsewhere on the internet!

The web site is provided free, simply to get more click-throughs to advertising and thus revenue to the Adver. The more controversial the comments the more visits to the website by outraged users. So why would they want to block such comments?
[quote][p][bold]Badgersgetabadname[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Phantom Poster[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Badgersgetabadname[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Phantom Poster[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Badgersgetabadname[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Ollie Dognacky[/bold] wrote: Correct. In the incident I was referring to, the former ChannelX tried to impersonate me and also give the impression that I condone people taking drugs whilst driving. So whilst not obviously breaking Ts & Cs, he was attempting to incite hatred etc. He likes to eke out some of my personal details from time to time also. He really needs medical help and possibly a restraining order[/p][/quote]So he did make all those comments? FFS some of it was pretty nasty even for him. I posted a link to use which bans IP`s for free. It cant be that difficult to do surely??? Just seems to make the whole comments section rather pointless when one person attempts to swing points by claiming to be multiple people? How can someone whos job role must list being socially responsible be so vile and twisted? I have had a look into history online and I didnt see anything that would suggest being effected by events or has had anything negative happen in lifetime to make so bitter?? We all have different triggers so maybe its a childhood thing. I tried to explain this to a couple of friends...Then I gave up as its just mental.[/p][/quote]Blocking an IP address is trivially simple, however an IP address doesn't necessarily identify a user. Company firewalls, proxy servers etc. result in multiple users sharing the same IP address. There's also no guarantee that someones ISP will always allocate a user the same IP address. If the person you are offended by worked at say Nationwide and posts while at work, do you think that their IP should be blocked and as a result, no other Nationwide employee be allowed to post?[/p][/quote]IT isnt really my thing which was why I posted the first one I found and was also the reason I posted it as a question here. I dont think Nationwide pay people to sit on local websites. Thank you for your insight.[/p][/quote]Oh for gods sake! Nationwide was just an example of a large local employer which I picked at random. Argh! - extreme face-slap! I think you will find it extremely unusual that any large employer would block internet access to a web site such as the Adver. I've certainly never worked for one who does. You just can't use the simplistic idea of blocking IP addresses here there and everywhere! So please stop suggesting that the Adver is being incompetent for not doing so![/p][/quote]No, as I thought I had typed IT is not my thing so I asked it as a question. Had a feeling you would jump up and down at that lol. Now who is being silly where or when did I suggest anyone was incompetent? Pretty sure all of my IT related comments were questions. I said X etc was a moron but that is a different matter. Strange comment to pick to have a go over when I have posted far stranger things.[/p][/quote]Sorry, it probably wasn't you - I think it may have been Davey Gravey who said that he couldn't understand why the Adver didn't just block Channel X's IP address. Why on earth are people so worked up about this? It's an anonymous posting forum, which will result in exactly the same behaviour as those elsewhere on the internet! The web site is provided free, simply to get more click-throughs to advertising and thus revenue to the Adver. The more controversial the comments the more visits to the website by outraged users. So why would they want to block such comments? Phantom Poster
  • Score: 0

10:26pm Sun 10 Aug 14

Badgersgetabadname says...

Phantom Poster wrote:
Badgersgetabadname wrote:
Phantom Poster wrote:
Badgersgetabadname wrote:
Phantom Poster wrote:
Badgersgetabadname wrote:
Ollie Dognacky wrote:
Correct.
In the incident I was referring to, the former ChannelX tried to impersonate me and also give the impression that I condone people taking drugs whilst driving.
So whilst not obviously breaking Ts & Cs, he was attempting to incite hatred etc.
He likes to eke out some of my personal details from time to time also.
He really needs medical help and possibly a restraining order
So he did make all those comments?
FFS some of it was pretty nasty even for him.
I posted a link to use which bans IP`s for free.
It cant be that difficult to do surely???
Just seems to make the whole comments section rather pointless when one person attempts to swing points by claiming to be multiple people?

How can someone whos job role must list being socially responsible be so vile and twisted?
I have had a look into history online and I didnt see anything that would suggest being effected by events or has had anything negative happen in lifetime to make so bitter??
We all have different triggers so maybe its a childhood thing.
I tried to explain this to a couple of friends...Then I gave up as its just mental.
Blocking an IP address is trivially simple, however an IP address doesn't necessarily identify a user. Company firewalls, proxy servers etc. result in multiple users sharing the same IP address. There's also no guarantee that someones ISP will always allocate a user the same IP address.

If the person you are offended by worked at say Nationwide and posts while at work, do you think that their IP should be blocked and as a result, no other Nationwide employee be allowed to post?
IT isnt really my thing which was why I posted the first one I found and was also the reason I posted it as a question here.
I dont think Nationwide pay people to sit on local websites.

Thank you for your insight.
Oh for gods sake! Nationwide was just an example of a large local employer which I picked at random. Argh! - extreme face-slap!

I think you will find it extremely unusual that any large employer would block internet access to a web site such as the Adver. I've certainly never worked for one who does.

You just can't use the simplistic idea of blocking IP addresses here there and everywhere! So please stop suggesting that the Adver is being incompetent for not doing so!
No, as I thought I had typed IT is not my thing so I asked it as a question.
Had a feeling you would jump up and down at that lol.

Now who is being silly where or when did I suggest anyone was incompetent?
Pretty sure all of my IT related comments were questions.
I said X etc was a moron but that is a different matter.

Strange comment to pick to have a go over when I have posted far stranger things.
Sorry, it probably wasn't you - I think it may have been Davey Gravey who said that he couldn't understand why the Adver didn't just block Channel X's IP address.

Why on earth are people so worked up about this? It's an anonymous posting forum, which will result in exactly the same behaviour as those elsewhere on the internet!

The web site is provided free, simply to get more click-throughs to advertising and thus revenue to the Adver. The more controversial the comments the more visits to the website by outraged users. So why would they want to block such comments?
Exactly.
And no worries I dont get upset at text....
It being a local web-site does not mean it doesnt have the same weirdos as the rest of the net.
I love my hometown and dont like the way it is being run into the ground by some who seem to have a huge amount of time to spend on here when surely they should be improving the town.
I like to read the opinions of people as to things that happen in the town and I enjoy winding up a certain person who I find to be a horrible little man.
For the most part it confuses me as to the point of any of it but I bring it with me while I go fishing which gives me a chuckle.
[quote][p][bold]Phantom Poster[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Badgersgetabadname[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Phantom Poster[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Badgersgetabadname[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Phantom Poster[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Badgersgetabadname[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Ollie Dognacky[/bold] wrote: Correct. In the incident I was referring to, the former ChannelX tried to impersonate me and also give the impression that I condone people taking drugs whilst driving. So whilst not obviously breaking Ts & Cs, he was attempting to incite hatred etc. He likes to eke out some of my personal details from time to time also. He really needs medical help and possibly a restraining order[/p][/quote]So he did make all those comments? FFS some of it was pretty nasty even for him. I posted a link to use which bans IP`s for free. It cant be that difficult to do surely??? Just seems to make the whole comments section rather pointless when one person attempts to swing points by claiming to be multiple people? How can someone whos job role must list being socially responsible be so vile and twisted? I have had a look into history online and I didnt see anything that would suggest being effected by events or has had anything negative happen in lifetime to make so bitter?? We all have different triggers so maybe its a childhood thing. I tried to explain this to a couple of friends...Then I gave up as its just mental.[/p][/quote]Blocking an IP address is trivially simple, however an IP address doesn't necessarily identify a user. Company firewalls, proxy servers etc. result in multiple users sharing the same IP address. There's also no guarantee that someones ISP will always allocate a user the same IP address. If the person you are offended by worked at say Nationwide and posts while at work, do you think that their IP should be blocked and as a result, no other Nationwide employee be allowed to post?[/p][/quote]IT isnt really my thing which was why I posted the first one I found and was also the reason I posted it as a question here. I dont think Nationwide pay people to sit on local websites. Thank you for your insight.[/p][/quote]Oh for gods sake! Nationwide was just an example of a large local employer which I picked at random. Argh! - extreme face-slap! I think you will find it extremely unusual that any large employer would block internet access to a web site such as the Adver. I've certainly never worked for one who does. You just can't use the simplistic idea of blocking IP addresses here there and everywhere! So please stop suggesting that the Adver is being incompetent for not doing so![/p][/quote]No, as I thought I had typed IT is not my thing so I asked it as a question. Had a feeling you would jump up and down at that lol. Now who is being silly where or when did I suggest anyone was incompetent? Pretty sure all of my IT related comments were questions. I said X etc was a moron but that is a different matter. Strange comment to pick to have a go over when I have posted far stranger things.[/p][/quote]Sorry, it probably wasn't you - I think it may have been Davey Gravey who said that he couldn't understand why the Adver didn't just block Channel X's IP address. Why on earth are people so worked up about this? It's an anonymous posting forum, which will result in exactly the same behaviour as those elsewhere on the internet! The web site is provided free, simply to get more click-throughs to advertising and thus revenue to the Adver. The more controversial the comments the more visits to the website by outraged users. So why would they want to block such comments?[/p][/quote]Exactly. And no worries I dont get upset at text.... It being a local web-site does not mean it doesnt have the same weirdos as the rest of the net. I love my hometown and dont like the way it is being run into the ground by some who seem to have a huge amount of time to spend on here when surely they should be improving the town. I like to read the opinions of people as to things that happen in the town and I enjoy winding up a certain person who I find to be a horrible little man. For the most part it confuses me as to the point of any of it but I bring it with me while I go fishing which gives me a chuckle. Badgersgetabadname
  • Score: 0

1:58am Mon 11 Aug 14

messyits says...

Contrary to comments here as to how information is gained from your computer or devices--it is almost impossible to stop it as every device has an electronic identity and uses pathways which are coded and can be tracked to source- a specific device. How on earth do you think the recent high profile hacking cases came about that delivered highly confidential information. This goes back to the cracking codes by the Enigma team at Bletchley.
Contrary to comments here as to how information is gained from your computer or devices--it is almost impossible to stop it as every device has an electronic identity and uses pathways which are coded and can be tracked to source- a specific device. How on earth do you think the recent high profile hacking cases came about that delivered highly confidential information. This goes back to the cracking codes by the Enigma team at Bletchley. messyits
  • Score: -1

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree