Duke and Duchess of Cambridge expecting first child

The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge, who have announced they are expecting their first child The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge, who have announced they are expecting their first child

THE Duke and Duchess of Cambridge are expecting a baby, St James's Palace has announced.

The Queen and Duke of Edinburgh, the Prince of Wales and members of both families are delighted with the news, said a spokesman.

But St James's Palace said in a statement that Kate had been admitted to a private hospital for treatment for a severe form of morning sickness known as hyperemesis gravidarum.

St James's Palace said in the statement: "The Duchess was admitted this afternoon to King Edward VII Hospital in central London with hyperemesis gravidarum.

"As the pregnancy is in its very early stages, Her Royal Highness is expected to stay in hospital for several days and will require a period of rest thereafter."

St James's Palace would not say when the royal couple became aware of the pregnancy only saying 'recently'.

It is understood that the pregnancy has not passed the 12-week point and the announcement was prompted by the Duchess's medical condition.

For women with hyperemesis gravidarum their vomiting can be so severe they cannot keep food or liquid down.

The condition usually continues past the first three months of pregnancy and can pass by week 21, but may also last longer.

Reacting on Twitter, Prime Minister David Cameron wrote: "I'm delighted by the news that the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge are expecting a baby. They will make wonderful parents."

Comments(10)

Fox in Exile says...
7:09pm Mon 3 Dec 12

Welcome to another sponger off the tax-payer. It will probably cost the same as every benefit claimer in Swindon during it’s lifetime

The Real Librarian says...
9:27pm Mon 3 Dec 12

Havent you heard.
they are largely self funding

Phantom Poster says...
10:25pm Mon 3 Dec 12

The Real Librarian wrote:
Havent you heard.
they are largely self funding
... and they got all of their land and properties from where? Give it all to me and I'll be self-funding as well!

LordAshOfTheBrake says...
10:44pm Mon 3 Dec 12

The Royal Family bring more revenue in to this country than it costs to keep them.

I may not be their biggest fans, but they are better to have than to have not.

http://www.telegraph
.co.uk/news/uknews/t
heroyalfamily/785033
5/The-Royal-family-i
s-a-bargain-for-Brit
ain.html

Phantom Poster says...
11:21pm Mon 3 Dec 12

So "we're all in it together" apart from the royal family are we?

Are you telling me that the royal family with "scrimping and saving" (sarcasm alert!) couldn't possibly manage to be self financing without the help of the taxpayer? Bear in mind that "self financing" still involves making money from the nations land and property.

What you seem to miss is the symbolism of people on low incomes being forced to contribute to an elite familys exorbitant income.

Phantom Poster says...
11:21pm Mon 3 Dec 12

So "we're all in it together" apart from the royal family are we?

Are you telling me that the royal family with "scrimping and saving" (sarcasm alert!) couldn't possibly manage to be self financing without the help of the taxpayer? Bear in mind that "self financing" still involves making money from the nations land and property.

What you seem to miss is the symbolism of people on low incomes being forced to contribute to an elite familys exorbitant income.

semitonic says...
8:15am Tue 4 Dec 12

We can't change the status quo but I'd be happy with another day off, around August please.

LordAshOfTheBrake says...
8:41am Tue 4 Dec 12

All of £1.33 per year for each tax payer. Those on low incomes will be getting tax credits, so they aren't really paying anything at all.

Its also a symbolism that brings more income into the country than it costs, so it could even be argued that it costs the tax payer nothing in real terms as its covered by tax revenues collected through tourism and other related means.

I 2 Could B says...
8:56am Tue 4 Dec 12

Fox in Exile wrote:
Welcome to another sponger off the tax-payer. It will probably cost the same as every benefit claimer in Swindon during it’s lifetime
One royal baby compared to around 25,000 people in Swindon alone (and that's just the ones who are solely dependent on benefits for their existence).

I think we all know which costs the taxpayer more.

house on the hill says...
1:45pm Tue 4 Dec 12

If you really are going to be affected by something like this then your life must be very empty and you need to get out more.
I have no time for royalty or celebrity for that matter but I do hope it all goes well for them as for all expectant parents.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree