Is there a future for the Tabernacle stones?

Coun Rod Bluh with some of the stone Buy this photo » Coun Rod Bluh with some of the stone

THE STONES of a long-demolished building, once dubbed Swindon’s St Paul’s Cathedral, still lay out of sight in a field – six years after being bought by Swindon Council to include in the town centre regeneration.

The 19th-century Baptist Tabernacle, which stood on the site of the Pilgrim Centre in Regent Circus, was demolished in 1978 and the stones sold off after it was vandalised and fell into disrepair.

Swindon Council paid out £360,000 in 2006 to secure the stone pillars, apex and frontage of the building, with all the windows, and hoped to include it as a feature of a £215m regeneration plan for Swindon’s town centre, focusing on Granville Street car park.

The council even had a guarantee it would be reimbursed for the cost of the stones by development partner Modus. But the firm went into administration in June 2009, and the stones have been left on one of the former runways at the Science Museum in Wroughton.

Council leader Rod Bluh, said a few ideas had since been suggested for their use, including in the new £500m Union Square development – but he thought that development was too modern, and felt the Regent Circus end of town would be more appropriate.

He said: “There are a number of schemes that are being looked at which would involve using them but there’s nothing definitive on the table yet.

“We’re looking at ways of using them in the town centre regeneration, as frontages to buildings or as features.

“There’s a couple of interesting ones that have come up literally in places that I never would have thought about. There’s about three or four ideas bouncing around but none of them have got any traction at the moment.

“I’m proud of the fact I got them returned to Swindon because it’s an important part of Swindon’s heritage. I took quite a lot of stick about it at the time but also got a lot of support.

“It was going to be part of the Modus scheme that fell through because of the recession.

“There’s a lot of people like myself who think it could be an important part of the town centre regeneration. A town that doesn’t invest in protecting its heritage rarely does well.”

But Des Moffatt, the Labour group’s finance lead, said the purchase was a foolish decision by an inexperienced leader and still could not see where they could be used.

He said: “We’re in the age of glass and concrete.

“You could never see the tabernacle stones fitting into that concrete and I was surprised the council leadership had managed to persuade a developer to even consider them.

“They’re still laying in a field at Wroughton and I expect them to be there for a great deal longer. I cannot see any modern designer seeking to incorporate them.”

Dan Rose, the chairman of the Mechanics’ Institution Trust, said: “As the council owns them it would be nice to see them used in some way, whether that’s part of a building or in some sort of public art or something, because clearly money has been spent on them.

“There’s no point debating whether they should have been bought or not. They have been bought. I think it would be good to actually get them used.

“I can’t think of a scheme where they could be used, either in a restoration or in a new building. But we have got them so we should try and look at how they should be used.”

Comments(16)

umpcah says...
4:27pm Thu 3 Jan 13

Assuming that they are not in anyone`s way, I suggest that the stones are left where they are.

A.Baron-Cohen says...
4:40pm Thu 3 Jan 13

It maybe the age of glass and concrete, but I have seen some really beautiful stone and glass structures not far from swindon: Bath

itsamess3 says...
4:52pm Thu 3 Jan 13

“There’s a lot of people like myself who think it could be an important part of the town centre regeneration. A town that doesn’t invest in protecting its heritage rarely does well.”
Mechanics--Corn Exchange-Railways-Go
ddard Estate to name a few Mr Bluh

PJC says...
5:46pm Thu 3 Jan 13

What happened the last time planners thought concrete and glass was the way forward in Swindon? We ended up with the eyesore that is the town centre we've have today. I have nothing against modernist architecture, but most of the stuff town planners do is safe & pedestrian & derivative. If it is going to draw people in, it needs to be exciting, not just boxes with sheet glass & constantly re-paving every few years & bunging a few lights & benches in.

PJC says...
5:47pm Thu 3 Jan 13

sorry, 'we have today'. I keyboard fumbled in my rantiness!

adsinibiza says...
5:49pm Thu 3 Jan 13

Given that the Labour party was in charge during much of Swindon development, perhaps Des Moffatts statement that "We’re in the age of glass and concrete" perhaps explains why Swindon in nothing to write home aboout.

As A Baron-Cohen suggests all you have to do is look at Bath.....

klempner69 says...
6:08pm Thu 3 Jan 13

The Council should never have allowed this Gem to have been demolished in the first place plus other land marks like the Old Market,the Central Club..in fact the whole of the town centre has been bulldozed for what..the Brunel Plaza..still has empty shop units after what 35 plus years?Thats progress for you.

whitein says...
7:19pm Thu 3 Jan 13

This building should have been the new library, and must be built into the new development. As the building in Old Town a new building could be built behind it.

Tim Newroman says...
9:37am Fri 4 Jan 13

One of the most interesting things about incorporating heritage is in specifically using very old artefacts within state of the art buildings an design. With some thought and imagination, the combination can be used to enhance both the old and new.

I find the comments of Des Moffat rather odd. He claims Mr Bluh to be an 'inexperienced leader' but then goes on to remark:


I was surprised the council leadership had managed to persuade a developer to even consider them.


An admission that would tend to suggest very strong, experienced and keen leadership skills.

Personally, I am happy that my council tax money was used to secure a part of Swindon's heritage for public ownership. If a way can be found to use them to good effect within the town's regeneration, it will have been an excellent investment.

twasadawf says...
10:45am Fri 4 Jan 13

Maybe they could be used on the 850 car park mausoleum entrance that will never be used at the bottom of princes st, but they really should be used as a facade to a grand shop/office or even my new house if i ever get one

house on the hill says...
1:54pm Fri 4 Jan 13

Or make them into a headstone and write on it "Here lies what used to be Swindon before it was left to rot".

OldTown90 says...
4:31pm Fri 4 Jan 13

Cllr Bluh states “I’m proud of the fact I got them returned to Swindon because it’s an important part of Swindon’s heritage."

isnt the fact of the matter that he didn't get them returned (if someone returns something it is invariably at no cost) but that he had to buy them back.

being returned and buying back are not quite the same thing Cllr Bluh.

twasadawf says...
12:01am Sat 5 Jan 13

Bluh sounds like the Mud fish in the Guinness advert

Nostim says...
4:57pm Mon 7 Jan 13

Is he hiding the lost Wi-Fi money under the stones

Nostim says...
4:58pm Mon 7 Jan 13

Is he hiding the lost Wi-Fi money under the stones

tfidean says...
3:00pm Sat 19 Jan 13

Crikey...Des Moffatt is a clever bloke and very observant...glass and concrete...10/10 chief.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree