Retirement flats set to get the go-ahead (From Swindon Advertiser)
Get involved! Send photos, video, news & views. Text SWINDON NEWS to 80360 or email us
Retirement flats set to get the go-ahead
9:20pm Friday 4th January 2013 in News By Katie Bond
PLANS are in the pipeline for a development of 24 retirement flats on land opposite the Blunsdon Arms.
A planning application has not yet been submitted, but public exhibitions have been held and work is expected to begin in the summer, provided the plans are given the go- ahead.
And, since gauging public opinion, developers McCarthy And Stone have already changed the plans to increase the number of parking spaces from eight to 14 following pressure from ward councillors and residents.
The land earmarked for the development is the patch developers tried to build a fast food restaurant on several years ago but were stopped by residents and North Swindon MP Justin Tomlinson, who was a councillor for the area at the time.
The development, in conjunction with Later Living Retirement Housing, would consist of 24 flats for retirees.
The site currently has planning permission for a 40-bedroom hotel which was granted when the development of the Blunsdon Arms was approved.
In a letter to residents, a McCarthy & Stone spokesman for said they based their decision to increase car parking spaces on feedback from residents.
He said: “It is not in McCarthy & Stone’s interest to under provide car parking provision as it would simply present difficulties in selling the apartments. “There are a number of factors that we take into consideration when assessing the level of car parking provision required.
“This includes the nature of the settlement, the proximity of the site to shops, services and public transport routes.
“And the mix of one and two-bedroom apartments can make some difference. “The presence of a bus route and the opportunity for these residents to use public transport would be one considering factor in the level of car parking provision provided.
“In this case Swindon Council’s parking policies advise a maximum of one space per two units, with a discount factor applied based on the sustainability of the site. “For the proposed 24 units the absolute maximum that planning policy requires us to provide is 12 spaces. However, based on some of the comments we received from the community engagement exercise, we have increased the level of parking provision by 30 per cent and will now be proposing 14 spaces for the proposed 24 units.”
North Swindon MP Justin Tomlinson said he expects the planning application to be given the thumbs up by local residents.
“Everyone supports the principle of an old people’s home as that is in keeping with the local residential area, in contrast to a KFC or McDonalds,” he said.
“There was concern that there wasn’t sufficient parking for the old people’s home, but myself and ward councillors have secured an extra 30 per cent parking.
“This will be a relief for the residents of Ash Brake who always feared a fast food outlet would try again to secure the site.”
Comments(8)
DiDiDI
says...
8:45pm Sat 5 Jan 13
purplerose
says...
9:18pm Sat 5 Jan 13
LordAshOfTheBrake
says...
10:24pm Sat 5 Jan 13
http://www.channel4.
com/programmes/dispa
tches/4od#3425819
Tim Newroman
says...
10:12am Sun 6 Jan 13
Swindon Council’s parking policies advise a maximum of one space per two units
This lunacy was introduced by the last Labour government. It was a travesty then and remains so now.
While it's possible that such a ridiculous ratio might possibly make some kind of sense in London (due to and almost worthwhile level of public transport options), it certainly makes zero sense for a development on the outskirts of a town such as Swindon.
Even a disinterested casual observer would know that a parking allocation of at least 18 spaces would be the miminum requirement for this kind of development. The retired tend to park their cars at home during the day for longer periods, which is the same time they tend to have guests and care workers visit them.
The problem is that car parking spaces don't make developers any money and yet occupy the same amount of land that can make them lots of money.
RichardR1
says...
10:20am Sun 6 Jan 13
Who indeed would buy a property opposite a community pub.
faatmaan
says...
2:28pm Sun 6 Jan 13
Empty Car Park
says...
11:30pm Sun 6 Jan 13
What "vision" not
Parking chaos "planned in"
13 years of Labour being continued under a Tory banner Tim
LordAshOfTheBrake says...
9:38pm Fri 4 Jan 13
Further more if anyone looks at the conditions on the planning for the blunsdon arms they will see a few clauses such as the garden areas cannot be used after 10pm..... Where do all those smokers go after 10pm?
The bus route that did service Ash Brake I'm pretty sure was cancelled/rerouted.
I'm sure any old folks that move in there will appreciate living next to a pub!
Mr Tomlinson can shove his generalisation of "Everyone supports the principle of an Old People home...." as I certainly don't.
A fast food restaurant would never get approval there now anyway due to the McDonalds and Pizza that is in the Orbital on the other side of Thamesdown Drive.
14 parking spaces for 24 units is ridiculous. Will the council enforce parking restrictions in the area? There are already a large number of people who park illegally on the roads by blocking dropped kerbs and within minimum distances of the roundabouts and junctions.