Climate change on film

Chasing Ice photo-grapher James Balog and director Jeff Orlowski Buy this photo » Chasing Ice photo-grapher James Balog and director Jeff Orlowski

SWINDON Climate Action Network is joining forces with the Swindon Film Society to show the film Chasing Ice as part of the Swindon Film Festival.

The film, now on general release in the UK, has been critically acclaimed and shortlisted for the Oscars.

It is the story of American photographer James Balog’s mission to gather evidence of climate change in the Arctic. Using time-lapse cameras, his videos shows ancient mountains of ice disappearing in minutes.

SCAN are presenting this film at what is probably its only public showing in Swindon and to mark Climate Week, Britain’s biggest climate change campaign.

This showing will take place at the Central Library, Regent Circus at 7.30pm on March 6.

Admission is free, but to guarantee a seat, tickets need to be booked in advance at the visitor information centre in the Central Library.

To book, email infocentre@swindon.gov.uk or phone 01793 466454.

The film is certificate 12A.

More details can be found at www.swindonclimate.org.uk or on the film’s website at www.chasingice.co.uk

Comments(42)

mememine69 says...
5:47pm Wed 13 Feb 13

So it's melting! How does studying effects not causes of climate fluctuation prove Humans cause climate variation now?
Explain the tropical fossils under the melting ice under both polar caps if this climate of today has never happened before.

itsamess3 says...
7:23pm Wed 13 Feb 13

mememine69 wrote:
So it's melting! How does studying effects not causes of climate fluctuation prove Humans cause climate variation now?
Explain the tropical fossils under the melting ice under both polar caps if this climate of today has never happened before.
You mean you dont know the seas and oceans with its currents carry all manner of things to different places?

LordAshOfTheBrake says...
9:12pm Wed 13 Feb 13

The definition of an ice age is essentially to have ice at the polar caps. We are still in an ice age.

There have been times when there was no ice at the polar caps. Therefore it is known that at times in its evolution the planet has been warmer than it is today.

The difference now is that the human population is supposed to be at threat by the rising temperatures, rising sea levels and so on.

@itsmess3, The point that was being made by mememine69 was that there is fossil evidence to prove that polar ice has not always been there. Even for the seas and oceanic currents to deposit fossils in those places, it cannot have been solid ice.

Fartim Poster says...
9:29pm Wed 13 Feb 13

Probably best yo make some effort to watch the film if people want to set a balanced opinion

itsamess3 says...
6:11am Thu 14 Feb 13

Lordash
@itsmess3, The point that was being made by mememine69 was that there is fossil evidence to prove that polar ice has not always been there. Even for the seas and oceanic currents to deposit fossils in those places, it cannot have been solid ice.”
Not always wise to reply on behalf of someone else.
The film has been shown at various stages of production and consultations took place with many groups to present a balanced and reasonably accurate film.
Firstly you need to understand that the mystery of how the planets formed has never been answered as the question is if the big bang took place how did that take place if there was nothing there?
Polar ice comes into 2 categories-sheet ice and caps and the poles differ greatly in that respect-one being attatched to land the other not.
Many expeditions have bored through the ice and provided a picture of many ages--it remains that sea flow carries all manner of objects from all corners of this earth and stuck in the ice. Evidence of undersea volcanos/tsunamis etc carried by the sea for miles.
There are claims the ice cap will be gone by 2030-should we panic?
In summary--we are no closer to uncovering the mystery of our planets or of life.

LordAshOfTheBrake says...
8:34am Thu 14 Feb 13

@itsamess3

I'm aware of ice caps and some of the science theory around them etc etc etc. Much of science is still theory backed up by experimentation and observation.

Your a fine one to talk about commenting on a response to someone else.

Your previous response to the original poster implied that currents could push artifacts though the ice; unless your accepting the original point that at some point in the fairly recent past there was significantly ice at the polar caps for those artifacts to have been deposited such they could be frozen over.

Always Grumpy says...
9:10am Thu 14 Feb 13

itsamess3 wrote:
mememine69 wrote:
So it's melting! How does studying effects not causes of climate fluctuation prove Humans cause climate variation now?
Explain the tropical fossils under the melting ice under both polar caps if this climate of today has never happened before.
You mean you dont know the seas and oceans with its currents carry all manner of things to different places?
Certainly fossils were never carried by any movements of the sea - a quite ludicrous assumption.
I suggest you spend some time looking up Plate Tectonics before you comment on something else you know nothing about. You'll find all the answers there as to how fossils are beneath ice caps, on the slopes of Mount Everest etc.

itsamess3 says...
9:30am Thu 14 Feb 13

A.G.
What on earth has Mount Everest to do with the poles which is the subject of the film?
You really do need to get your facts correct as you do constantly remind others.
Perhaps you should study some of the findings of extensive studies of the poles-both of the ice sheet and caps-all of the scientific kind.

itsamess3 says...
9:46am Thu 14 Feb 13

LordAsh
Fossils of allsorts are found thousands of miles from their origins-how would you explain how they arrived on the seabed below the poles?

LordAshOfTheBrake says...
9:54am Thu 14 Feb 13

@itsamess

Not deputing how they get moved around. Its the fact they are buried in ice; which must indicate that when the fossil got there, there wasn't ice!

itsamess3 says...
10:10am Thu 14 Feb 13

@itsmess3, The point that was being made by mememine69 was that there is fossil evidence to prove that polar ice has not always been there. Even for the seas and oceanic currents to deposit fossils in those places, it cannot have been solid ice.”
Pre-ice age-but do remember the differences between the poles and where the fossils were found.

Always Grumpy says...
11:23am Thu 14 Feb 13

itsamess3 wrote:
A.G.
What on earth has Mount Everest to do with the poles which is the subject of the film?
You really do need to get your facts correct as you do constantly remind others.
Perhaps you should study some of the findings of extensive studies of the poles-both of the ice sheet and caps-all of the scientific kind.
I'm giving you an example of plate tectonics - those are the facts, which you care to ignore as usual, as they are contrary to your misguided beliefs.
You appear to have once again highlighted your complete scientific ignorance, something you manage to do on a regular basis. Whether it's your failure to understand the difference between fusion and fission or the effects of plate tectonics on why there are fossils under glaciers or on top of mountains.
Do try and read (or get someone to read for you) a few scientific papers. It might just help you to understand things a little clearly. I somehow suspect it won't, so I'll leave you to wallow in your own self ignorance.
You have my deapest sympathy for once again showing yourself to be a complete fool.

RichardR1 says...
12:59pm Thu 14 Feb 13

Well what a surprise he's an expert on another scientific discipline, NOT.

Detailed temperature recording using NASA and other sources can still not establish if the earths temperature is rising or falling, even the Berkley Earth research highlights one thing, that the likleyhood of temperature armagendum is remote at best with a 1.5 degree c rise (average) in 250 years.

The important thing is that there is that warming since 1998 despite claims to the contrary.

The earths climate is cyclical and this is just another cycle. Even if Humans contributed at the rate claimed (5%) in terms of atmospheric disruption it is just a drop in the Ocean, if the world is going to implode nothing we can do will stop it.

That is blatently obvious to 30,000 plus Cimate Scientists who have signed the Manhatten Accord, of course the 2500 in the employ of the EU don't agree, as their incomes depend on the myth of MMGW.

Tim Newroman says...
1:59pm Thu 14 Feb 13

As touched upon above, Global Warming, Climate Change (call it what you will) is not a problem for the planet at all. The planet will survive.

No, the scaremongering is all about how long humans may be able to survive on a planet that is in no sense 'ours' and never has been, or will be.

The human race will eventually be erradicated whether we choose to like that scenario or not.

@Always Grumpy: we may well have our differences, but I have enjoyed you taking itsamess3's wikipedia copy and past argument apart so completely. Can this stuff *really* be the work of an accomplished, internationally respected nuclear scientist?

itsamess3 says...
3:04pm Thu 14 Feb 13

A.G.
I do think you use any excuse for your usual abusive rants which has nothing to do with the point of dispute at all.
Perhaps you should (a) watch the film as there really is some stunning scenes-then study a few of the many combined reports by highly rated scientists/geologist
s and archeologists and a host of allied professionals. Of course you will not do that as you do seem to think you are the font of all knowledge--especiall
y now you have been joined by your 2 best buddies.
Personally i cannot see anything in what you have said that relates to any discoveries at either of the poles-unless they moved Everest without anyone noticing. Don't forget your ally has brought in some political issues so be sure to use that to your advantage.

RichardR1 says...
3:05pm Thu 14 Feb 13

Tim welcome to the growing number who see right through itsamess3 or which ever number he uses.

RichardR1 says...
3:18pm Thu 14 Feb 13

Nothing if not consistent, the world famous nuclear scientist. Diverting already, so he's seen the film, now didn't the article say the viewing is likely to be the only one in Swindon.

Or could it be he watched the trailer featured on the website.

So where did you see it Mr itsamess or is it a secret.

itsamess3 says...
4:32pm Thu 14 Feb 13

Dear oh dear bobby--your extreme jealousy-diddums-did none of your pals invite you to one of the many screenings all over the country long before it is released here--but has been out some while in many countries.
As i said--it does not provide all the answers-but some truly stunning shots.
It has nothing to do with nuclear science
and it certainly is no secret--you could of course buy a copy off the internet as no doubt one of the sites will have it.

RichardR1 says...
4:53pm Thu 14 Feb 13

So not answering another simple question then.?

Not seen abobby posting here.

itsamess3 says...
5:05pm Thu 14 Feb 13

The answer is--dont be a lazy bobby and as you are not likely to be invited to private screenings you will have to wait until its released here--close the door as you leave.

Always Grumpy says...
5:15pm Thu 14 Feb 13

itsamess3 wrote:
A.G.
I do think you use any excuse for your usual abusive rants which has nothing to do with the point of dispute at all.
Perhaps you should (a) watch the film as there really is some stunning scenes-then study a few of the many combined reports by highly rated scientists/geologist

s and archeologists and a host of allied professionals. Of course you will not do that as you do seem to think you are the font of all knowledge--especiall

y now you have been joined by your 2 best buddies.
Personally i cannot see anything in what you have said that relates to any discoveries at either of the poles-unless they moved Everest without anyone noticing. Don't forget your ally has brought in some political issues so be sure to use that to your advantage.
Well messy, I'll sleep really well again tonight knowing that once again you have made a complete fool of yourself.
I'm sorry, but you really haven't a clue as to what you're on about, as usual.
Go to one of the libraries in the town (before they close) and get a few books out that will explain everything to you. You might even be able to some large print versions with plenty of pictures that even a fool such as yourself might understand. You really have shown yourself up big time on this particular issue.

For the sake of your own health, I would give up on this one and stick to watching your archived videos of life outside the Carpenters.

RichardR1 says...
5:18pm Thu 14 Feb 13

Well clear proof you have no idea what you are talking about.

It was released in the UK and Ireland on December 14th last year for public viewing after it's Premier on December 3rd.

There are numerous venues currently listed. It is being shown in Oxford tonight.

Simple to establish merely look at the website.

itsamess3 says...
6:08pm Thu 14 Feb 13

A.G.
Still not answered what mount Everest has to do with the poles.
Really is that the best you can do-resort to abuse--sure sign you do not have a clue.

itsamess3 says...
6:49pm Thu 14 Feb 13

Well blobby--i certainly saw it long before Dec 14th-by invitation.

Did none of your pals invite you to one of the many screenings all over the country long before it was released here--but has been out some while in many countries?
Thats what i said-and numerous uni's were treated to a viewing and guest lecturers discussed the lessons learned.
You seem to miss such information.
Do apply for a free ticket for the swindon showing--you will have plenty of time to get here.

RichardR1 says...
7:59pm Thu 14 Feb 13

No one believes you itsamess so stop making yourself look stupid. You said 'when' it is released. Clear and concise.

itsamess3 says...
9:26pm Thu 14 Feb 13

RichardR1 wrote:
No one believes you itsamess so stop making yourself look stupid. You said 'when' it is released. Clear and concise.
So you have difficulty reading as well-no surprise there. Do read my post @ 4-32 PM 14 Feb 13 as i reproduced in my last post--no when there is there?
The UK premiere was early dec after which questions were answered by the film makers--followed by more venues including several well known uni's.
You do like to alter statements dont you? Wonder where you picked up that bad habit of altering the truth?

Always Grumpy says...
10:19pm Thu 14 Feb 13

itsamess3 wrote:
A.G.
Still not answered what mount Everest has to do with the poles.
Really is that the best you can do-resort to abuse--sure sign you do not have a clue.
It's all to do with plate tectonics and uplift. Far too advanced for you to understand obviously.
I would just stick to being an internationally recognised nuclear scientist if I were you - much easier than being a geologist.
By the way, had the call to visit North Korea yet? Your expertise must be needed out there to help defuse the situation.
Oh, what a sadly deluded muppet you are!

RichardR1 says...
7:47am Fri 15 Feb 13

Ah so you've now read their website. Information clearly in the public domain, and merely repeating what I have already said, very clever. as for the 'when' comment, just to jog your memory;

'The answer is--dont be a lazy bobby and as you are not likely to be invited to private screenings you will have to wait until its released here--close the door as you leave.'

You are a past master at semantics as well as distraction, but as AG once again has shown you are as likely to be a scientist as I am, the difference of course is I don't claim to be one.

itsamess3 says...
9:24am Fri 15 Feb 13

More rubbish then--still no when in sight and as it appears i am the only one who has seen the film and met some of the team--i can say the film is all about claimed proof of the affect of global warming-nothing at all to do with tetronic plates--korea--and a host of abusive remarks.
The national news quite adequately deals with the korea incident.
That simply shows others come here purely to be abusive-thye 3 stooges come to mind.

RichardR1 says...
9:49am Fri 15 Feb 13

Yeah OK itsamess3 you were and invited and met the makes, 'another one flew over the cuckos nest'.

By the way we all know what it's about it's in the article and in the bio on their website.

Tim Newroman says...
10:54am Fri 15 Feb 13

No one has been 'abusive' to you, itsamess3, although they have every cause to be and would have every right to be.

Just because several people clearly highlight your errors does not mean they have been 'abusive'. Nobody buys your little victim routine.

itsamess3 says...
12:41pm Fri 15 Feb 13

Until you watch the film--you cannot comment on what it proves--or not.
The 3 caballeros have raised numerous issues that contain little to no truth--but has provided a very clear picture of a very persistent liar over a very long period of time.
My stance as far as global warming is well known both in my occupation and with groups i work with to improve old technologies and encourage the new ones that can provide clean power for homes and industry.
Do i care what idiots choose to believe in vain attempts to discredit me--nah--i just snigger at the thought that much of my articles throughout the net have been read by millions and ideas sent in by many-same with my work-i am referred to regularly.
Clever lot arn't you that none of you can work it out. You are just to busy trying and failing to convince all and sundry you are the 3 wise men.
Do get your tickets to watch the film as it is stunning in places-but how convincing is after all a matter of opinion.

RichardR1 says...
12:59pm Fri 15 Feb 13

Such a stunning nuclear scientist that no one can work out who you are.

Perhaps it's because no one cares, have you thought of that, your whole posting history makes it obvious you are simply a delusional wannabee.

itsamess3 says...
3:31pm Fri 15 Feb 13

Have you booked your ticket for the film yet on the 6th? Too far to travel i guess.

RichardR1 says...
5:44pm Fri 15 Feb 13

I could walk to the venue itsamess. As I do not believe that man is responsible for 95% of climate change whatever this film shows will simply add to the political distortion of the facts.

But of course we know by your previous posts you do not care about scientific integrity and truth.

itsamess3 says...
7:40pm Sat 16 Feb 13

The film has no political motivation and commissioned by National Geograpic.
Political distortion takes place usually by wannabe politicians like yourself who rarely have any idea of what they are on about. Perhaps you should take time to watch Obama's state of the union address where he sets out a host of measures to tackle emissions.
"But of course we know by your previous posts you do not care about scientific integrity and truth.”
My peers would disagree with you and my reviews have been supported by them as i rely on proven research and facts.
Honesty-says the man claiming to be an expert on everything yet denies who he really is when you make identical claims daily-the same spelling mistakes (not typos) and a host of other gaffes all provable.
As to the film-i have not made any claims as to if it proves anything--i simply say there is some stunning photography. Global warming and climate change is measured by many means and events that affect our atmosphere. The most graphic proof in recent years was the actions taken by China in preparing for the Olympics--clear proof ratified by monitoring.
How you derive your figures has to be from politically motivated groups as they do not match valid reports by many branches of the sciences.
There is no argument you could make that would convince me of any of your claims as you always choose biassed reports-not facts.

RichardR1 says...
8:33am Sun 17 Feb 13

Ah once again you completely divert from your original stance. Picking organisations like NASA ia hardly being selective. NASA's data sets are used by both sides of the argument or commenting on the Berkely Earth results, a pro MMGW organisation.

Not surprising it has been commissioned by National Geographic the guys a NG staffer, clearly earning his pay.

RichardR1 says...
8:42am Sun 17 Feb 13

No if scientists are not manipulators of the truth how do you account for this article:

http://www.theregist
er.co.uk/2008/05/02/
a_tale_of_two_thermo
meters/

This is what they say about NASA suddenly re-evaluating historical monitored temperature data to reverse the temperature pattern.

'From a statistical viewpoint, data recalculation should cause each year to have a 50/50 probability of going either up or down - thus the odds of all 70 adjusted years working in concert to increase the slope of the graph (as seen in the combined version) are an astronomical 2 raised to the power of 70. That is one-thousand-billion
-billion to one.'

Scientific integrity or fraud?

RichardR1 says...
9:03am Sun 17 Feb 13

Now just in case you don't like American Scientists how about a British expert:

http://www.see.leeds
.ac.uk/see-research/
igs/seddies/francis/
index.htm

'" What we are seeing really is just another interglacial phase within our big icehouse climate." Dismissing political calls for a global effort to reverse climate change, she said, " It's really farcical because the climate has been changing constantly... What we should do is be more aware of the fact that it is changing and that we should be ready to adapt to the change."

Professor Jane Francis
CV: http://www.see.leeds
.ac.uk/see-research/
igs/seddies/francis/
cv.htm

itsamess3 says...
12:00pm Sun 17 Feb 13

Oh dear
I have not mentioned anyone in particular other than those involved in the film--of course you cannot comment on the film as you have not seen it.
Perhaps you should read the peer reviews of the professor you name-then give an opinion.
I gave you a good instance with chinas clean up of Beijing for the olympics in a very short period--perhaps you should read the universally accepted results from monitoring. Further studies in other cities such as Quindao where the sea was filled with algae caused by factories spewing waste into the sea.
Post olympics it has returned to pre olympic state.
You have very little idea of how growing technology can dramatically reduce or eliminate many poisonous or dangerous gasses.
Do you know how many gasses even the most fuel efficient diesel or petrol car give out and compare that to HFC power that emits only water and gas boilers both household and industrial can emit poisonous gasses.
Last but not least emission free nuclear. Many more.
You are incapable of conducting an unbiassed debate due to your political leanings and name professors that almost support your political masters--but not quite as she is right in one way but not in others.
The facts are simple-climate change is taking place and the reasons are multiple which include natural movements within our planet and man made devastation of our planet.
You cannot comment on the film or its conclusions as you have not seen it and no doubt you have not read the conclusions of the 2 main very specialist scientists conclusions.
Other good reading are the results of continuous monitoring by numerous scientists who man stations at the poles and have done so for many years.
So yes--i dismiss politically biassed claims as they are rarely factual and amatuers who profess great knowledge they dont have and never accept claims by proven liars.

RichardR1 says...
7:13pm Sun 17 Feb 13

What has the smog in China to do with this film. Your leaps are incredible.

So you slag off a fellow scientist (that's assuming of course you are ) Very professional.

It is standard practice to criticise scientists who are not playing the game, we see it in many disciplines. The fact she is criticised probably means she is the one telling the truth.

With billions available to climate scientists who do play the game, they are perfectly happy to speak against colleagues. So I am far from surprised you choose to do the same.

What the rest of you post has to do with anything only your deluded mind could possibly know.

itsamess3 says...
9:08pm Sun 17 Feb 13

What has the smog in China to do with this film. Your leaps are incredible.
Jeez you are thicker than i thought.

So you slag off a fellow scientist (that's assuming of course you are ) Very professional.

In fact i was very generous to her status you really do need to find better sources of information.

With billions available to climate scientists who do play the game, they are perfectly happy to speak against colleagues. So I am far from surprised you choose to do the same.

(a) I have never been a climate scientist and have never claimed otherwise. However i do have a keen interest in anything that reduces pollutants entering our atmosphere.

If you know of any scientist who as you say "play the game" to misuse billions i can only suggest you lodge a complaint to their official body who rigorously investigate such claims--you would need some form of evidence though.
As you claimed to have contacts at Rutherford Laboratories they could be your first choice.
(b) The chinese example shows that a better climate there resulted from the measures they took--the film was made to prove climate change is happening.
As yet i have not fully read the data and findings thus reached no conclusion.
Do stop making claims you cannot prove.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree