Council agrees budget - but warns of challenges ahead (From Swindon Advertiser)
Get involved! Send photos, video, news & views. Text SWINDON NEWS to 80360 or email us
Council agrees budget - but warns of challenges ahead
7:00pm Friday 22nd February 2013 in News
Coun Rod Bluh
SWINDON Council’s Tory administration has seen its proposed budget passed by a small margin.
The Conservatives, who hold a slim majority of one, were missing Coun Peter Heaton-Jones at last night’s full cabinet meeting. But had their budget passed thanks to support from the Liberal Democrats.
The Labour party proposed amendments which included further cuts to Forward Swindon and savings spent on addressing potholes and retaining the subsidy of buses, but that was not accepted by the full council.
The Lib Dems did manage to get two amendments to the budget as they were able to decrease the cut to the locality budget by £61,000 and maintain the opening hours in all libraries.
Coun Mark Edwards, cabinet member for finance, said: “This budget is not without risk but it is a positive budget. These are the most challenging financial times that councils have seen. The challenge is far from over.”
Politicians from all parties voted in favour of freezing council tax for the next year, with the final budget proposals aiming to plug an estimated £16m gap in the budget for 2013/14.
Council leader Rod Bluh said after the meeting that he was happy the budget had been passed but expected a tough time ahead.
He said: “It is the right budget for the people of Swindon and this is where the hard work really starts. The Labour amendments were all about grabbing the headlines. My position is quite clear, it is about getting the right balance.”
At the meeting, Labour leader Jim Grant appealed for a number of amendments to the buget, but without success.
He said: “We recognise that tough decisions have to be made by the council in this budget and future budgets.
“With the costs of management and councillors, we believe more savings can be made that won’t affect the council’s performance but can be used to protect transport services to the elderly and the disabled.
“We will do this by retaining the existing level of subsidy to the Swindon Dial A Ride service and the existing levels of subsidy for Swindon’s bus services.
“This proposal will have a real impact on people’s lives and it contributes to what this administration says is one of its key goals – independent living for all people and reduced isolation.
“By cutting the Dial A Ride service and the council’s bus subsidy, this council will take a step backwards in achieving these goals and that is why we’re proposing to save these services.”
Coun Stan Pajak, leader of the Liberal Democrats, said it was a good night for his party.
He said: “We had three amendments to the budget and saw two passed. The libraries, which the Conservatives agreed was a bit harsh, and the localities which will see the seven localities kept.
“This is the hardest of times with money being taken away from local government and there is no option to raise council tax.”
He also defended three of his party for voting against the Labour amendments despite agreeing with a number of their comments and voting for the amendment himself.
He said; “There were a lot of good points that I agreed with like Dial A Ride and to do more on the highways but unfortunately it was not passed.”
Comments(6)
peatmoor pirate
says...
7:35am Mon 25 Feb 13
Tim Newroman
says...
8:39am Mon 25 Feb 13
peatmoor pirate wrote:Couldn't agree more. Nationally, the tipping point has already been reached: 53% now take more from the state than they contribute.
Sadly, local Govt has stopped being about providing services to all and now is just about taxing those who have, to provide more and more to those who have not. The model is flawed and leaves those of us paying our whack increasingly frustrated and those in need (real or imagined) campaigning against cuts.
We're now essentially living in an even more twisted version of communism than even the communists advocate.
Still, the only upside is that it's all coming crashing down. Our triple A rating has already gone and the 10% who now pay the vast majority of the tax to keep the country afloat are emigrating at record levels.
Labour will win the next general election and, in two years time, find there is not only no money to spend, but no way of borrowing more or raising tax revenues. It's going to be very, very interesting. How will a party that only knows how to spend other people's money manage to govern when there is no money for them to spend at all?
I Could Do That
says...
9:39am Mon 25 Feb 13
Labour will win the next general election and, in two years time, find there is not only no money to spend, but no way of borrowing more or raising tax revenues. It's going to be very, very interesting. How will a party that only knows how to spend other people's money manage to govern when there is no money for them to spend at all?
Maybe the conservatives will fix everything before the next election.
If the conservatives do a good job, labour won't get in
Mind you the conservatives at SBC seem equally keen to waste other people's money
Tim Newroman
says...
12:08pm Mon 25 Feb 13
Of course the Conservatives won't win the next election, they didn't even win the last one - and that was when people still thought there was economic hope, felt it time for a change and (obviously) didn't want to see Gordon Brown stay in as prime minister.
They're not even taking steps to reduce the deficit and are routinely increasing, or introducing, yet more taxes to fund the unsustainable welfare bill.
They've hidden behind the LibDems unwillingness to do anything as a means to try and justify the lack of progress, but the reality is that the coalition really hasn't done anything to roll-back the problems and damage caused by Labour.
house on the hill
says...
1:58pm Mon 25 Feb 13
8:39am Mon 25 Feb 13
peatmoor pirate wrote:
Sadly, local Govt has stopped being about providing services to all and now is just about taxing those who have, to provide more and more to those who have not. The model is flawed and leaves those of us paying our whack increasingly frustrated and those in need (real or imagined) campaigning against cuts.
Couldn't agree more. Nationally, the tipping point has already been reached: 53% now take more from the state than they contribute.
We're now essentially living in an even more twisted version of communism than even the communists advocate""""
Agree with both wholeheartedly, the have's and the responsible now subsidise the have nots (or the give me some of yours would be more appropriate) and the irresponsible.
there is now no incentive to work or to save and try and improve your life or home (other than self respect which isnt around in great supply clearly). Can someone please explain why a couple who have saved their money to buy a 4 bed house finish up paying more council tax than a family of 6 in a 3 bed semi who earn the same money but have just decided to spend it in a different way, who will clearly use more council services than the couple will?
We are taxing the wealthy 5% who provide 30% of our total tax revenue out of the country (through nothing more than the jealousy of you have more than me so i want some of yours). It will take years to get the AAA rating back if ever as I dont see either party being able to get us out of this mess. As Tim says very "interesting" times ahead!
let_breathe_clean_air says...
11:48pm Sat 23 Feb 13