Council forced to sell off land

Council leader Rod Bluh Council leader Rod Bluh

THE site of the Old Town Co-Op store is being auctioned off by the council to raise money to pay off more than £3m of equal pay claims.

The sale, which is for the freehold of the site, will take place tomorrow and it is hoped it will bring in around £3.5m. The majority of this will be used to settle the claims, mainly brought by current and former female staff.

The property comprises part of the supermarket – the main entrance from the car park and the Co-Op travel store – together with part of the parking provision at the rear of the property.

It is let to Midcounties Co-operative Estates Ltd for a term of 125 years from 1984, bringing in £56,750 per annum, exclusive of rates.

Following a number of test cases, councils nationwide must provide back payments to compensate for discriminatory salaries.

Up until the end of 2012/13, councils have been able to meet this liability from borrowing as the Government previously issued a capitalisation directive, meaning the cost could be spread over a number of years.

But the Government has recently changed this, so equal pay costs would fall on the revenue budget, which pays for everyday services, in 2013/4, or could be met through capital receipts gained from the sale of council assets.

Council leader Rod Bluh, said the equality payments totalled about £3.3m.

“We’ve done that to raise the capital receipt basically. We have got a problem that we have got an equality pay liability which normally we would have capitalised and paid off over a number of years, and the Government has said we cannot do that any more.

“We can only do it by capital receipts and revenue. Because our revenue position is so tight, we have to sell an asset to pay for it.

“I don’t think the Government’s idea is good, personally. I think it was introduced with virtually no notice. It means we now have to sell an asset that can provide future income to pay for it. This is not something we would have chosen to do unless we had been forced.”

Des Moffatt, Labour’s finance lead, said: “There were test cases.

“When these test cases had been settled, these ones that have been piled up in the local authorities over the years are required to be settled and the Government decreed that that settlement must only be from sale of assets, therefore local government is required to sell under pressure some of their assets.”

Coun Moffatt said the Co-op might buy it or it might be bought by a pension fund, for example, but it would make no difference to the store, except that it would potentially pay the rent to someone else.

He added: ”I accept it has to be sold. I believe it will generate enough money on its own in order to satisfy the needs.

“I don’t expect that to have a serious impact on Swindon society or the Co-op.”

Comments(8)

StillPav says...
11:31am Mon 18 Mar 13

"It is let to Midcounties Co-operative Estates Ltd for a term of 125 years from 1984, bringing in £56,750 per annum, exclusive of rates."

I wonder how many other assets the council own where they lease on a peppercorn rent.

Maybe it's time they started charging market rates?

MrAngry says...
11:58am Mon 18 Mar 13

Sounds like a no-brainer. Even if the council were allowed to borrow the money (£3.3 million), the interest payments would cancel out any revenue.

house on the hill says...
1:48pm Mon 18 Mar 13

Does seem like yet another bad investment so if they can sell that would be the best option

Peter Mallinson says...
2:16pm Mon 18 Mar 13

I have just one question.

" Who was in control in 1984"?

Al Smith says...
4:02pm Mon 18 Mar 13

Peter Mallinson wrote:
I have just one question.

" Who was in control in 1984"?
Depends on whether the land was originally owned by Wiltshire County Council or Thamesdown Borough Council.

If it was WCC then it's your current party and if it's TBC then it's your old party (you remember - the one you wanted to be leader of in Swindon).

So do you think £56k pa is good (because it helps business in these though economic times) or bad (because SBC needs every penny it can get to pay £55k severance payments and if that makes life tougher for businesses then so be it)?

StillPav says...
4:49pm Mon 18 Mar 13

@Al Smith - "So do you think £56k pa is good (because it helps business in these though economic times) or bad (because SBC needs every penny it can get to pay £55k severance payments and if that makes life tougher for businesses then so be it)?"

It's terrible. The council could charge double and it would still be cheap.

Al Smith says...
5:36pm Mon 18 Mar 13

StillPav wrote:
@Al Smith - "So do you think £56k pa is good (because it helps business in these though economic times) or bad (because SBC needs every penny it can get to pay £55k severance payments and if that makes life tougher for businesses then so be it)?"

It's terrible. The council could charge double and it would still be cheap.
This isn't the whole store we're talking about, it's just:
- the main entrance from the car park
- the Co-Op travel store
- part of the parking provision at the rear of the property

If it was the whole site then it would be another matter.

It's worth mentioning that retailers have actually said that high rents are killing UK retail.

StillPav says...
10:06pm Mon 18 Mar 13

@Al Smith - if it's "worth" £3.5m then charging £56k is a yield of 1.6%, which as someone else has said is less than a standard savings account.

If a pension fund pays £3.5m for this land then they will want a significantly higher return on their investment than that.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree