Fewer pupils in Swindon skipping school (From Swindon Advertiser)
Get involved! Send photos, video, news & views. Text SWINDON NEWS to 80360 or email us
Fewer pupils in Swindon skipping school
1:00pm Thursday 21st March 2013 in News By Emma Dunn
Councillor David Renard
THE number of children across the town who are persistently absent from school has fallen.
A total of 1,405 pupils in primary, secondary and special schools missed more than a month of school last year.
That number was down from 1,490 in 2010/2011.
Overall absence, which includes both authorised and unauthorised absences, is also down across Swindon, with 5.0 per cent of pupils missing school sessions each day compared to 5.5 per cent the year before.
Coun David Renard, the Swindon Council cabinet member for children’s services, said: “There is a lot of good work that goes on at the council to work with schools to reduce absences and it seems to be working.”
In primary schools in Swindon the percentage of persistent absentees was this year was 2.7.
This is an improvement on the previous year, which saw persistent absentees in primary schools standing at at 3.7 per cent.
There was a marginal rise in secondary schools, up to 8.0 per cent from 7.5 per cent; and in special schools, up to 17.7 per cent from 16.6 per cent.
The statistics are in line with national figures which show almost 60,000 fewer children across the country were persistently absent from school last year compared with the year before.
Last year, 333,850 students were persistently absent from school – down from 392,305 in 2010/11.
The decline follows the Government’s decision to lower the persistent absence threshold from 20 per cent of school missed to 15 per cent of school missed so that heads can step in earlier to tackle problems.
In secondary schools, 7.4 per cent of pupils were persistently absent in 2011/12 – a decline from 8.4 per cent in 2010/11.
In primary schools, 3.1 per cent of pupils were persistently absent in 2011/12 compared with 3.9 per cent in 2010/11.
Overall absence is also down across all schools in England.
Last year, an average of 327,000 pupils were out of school each day. This compares to 370,000 pupils in 2010/11.
Children who attend school regularly were four times more likely to achieve five or more good GCSEs including English and Maths than those who are persistently absent.
A spokesman for the Department For Education said: “If children are not in school they cannot learn.
“Too many children are still missing too many lessons.
“We must continue to tackle poor attendance and make sure every pupil gets a good education.”
Comments(8)
Tim Newroman
says...
2:02pm Thu 21 Mar 13
OK, nobody is saying it's responsible not to make your kids go to school, but while they seem to completely overlook - or do everything they can do let off - serious and violent criminals, it does seem a bit odd.
Bobfm ,
says...
2:45pm Thu 21 Mar 13
And, no, most of the parents have been given umpteen warnings before it got to this stage.
Plus these cases are only ever heard at Magistrates' Court. The violent offenders are nearly always sent to Crown Court.
Tim Newroman
says...
3:51pm Thu 21 Mar 13
A complete waste of everyone's time, effort and money.
And the kids still won't go to school.
Plenty of violent offenders are dealt with by the magistrates, who are often even more clueless and lenient than the fancy dress wearing judiciary.
Bobfm ,
says...
6:51pm Thu 21 Mar 13
Following the first prosecution, subsequent failure for the child to attend attracts an aggravated offence punishable by custodial sentence. And, before you ask, yes parents have genuinely gone to prison for a continued offence. Attendance improves in the vast majority of cases after the first prosecution, thus proving the value of education welfare officers.
Your views on the failure of the criminal justice system are well-documented (you state them regularly enough) but it is disappointing when you try and state with authority matters that you haven't experienced or researched properly.
Localboy86
says...
9:46pm Thu 21 Mar 13
Bobfm , wrote:Brilliant post
Again, you state as fact things that are just your opinion. And you are incorrect.
Following the first prosecution, subsequent failure for the child to attend attracts an aggravated offence punishable by custodial sentence. And, before you ask, yes parents have genuinely gone to prison for a continued offence. Attendance improves in the vast majority of cases after the first prosecution, thus proving the value of education welfare officers.
Your views on the failure of the criminal justice system are well-documented (you state them regularly enough) but it is disappointing when you try and state with authority matters that you haven't experienced or researched properly.
1 2 Could B
says...
10:00am Fri 22 Mar 13
Nice one Bob.
Totally agree :-)
Tim Newroman
says...
11:00am Mon 25 Mar 13
Bobfm , wrote:You remind me very much of itsamess3. Always posting what everyone knows is the stated and proper procedure (ie, the theory) and implying that's how it all works in reality.
Again, you state as fact things that are just your opinion. And you are incorrect.
Following the first prosecution, subsequent failure for the child to attend attracts an aggravated offence punishable by custodial sentence. And, before you ask, yes parents have genuinely gone to prison for a continued offence. Attendance improves in the vast majority of cases after the first prosecution, thus proving the value of education welfare officers.
Your views on the failure of the criminal justice system are well-documented (you state them regularly enough) but it is disappointing when you try and state with authority matters that you haven't experienced or researched properly.
If only that were the case.
house on the hill says...
1:38pm Thu 21 Mar 13