Liquidators poised as double glazing firm closes doors

Bettaglaze closed its Stratton depot yesterday

Bettaglaze closed its Stratton depot yesterday

First published in News
Last updated

DOUBLE glazing firm Bettaglaze closed their Stratton depot at short notice yesterday amid reports liquidators have been on site.

The firm, based in Bramble Road on the Techno Industrial Estate, is believed to have gone into administration and is no longer open for business, with the phone lines no longer available.

The firm supplies and installs replacement UPVC windows, doors and conservatories as well as offering double and triple-glazing services.

The Adver have been unable to get in touch with the management of the company, since the phone lines have been disconnected and the main site has been closed up.

Comments (20)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

2:24pm Wed 15 Jan 14

A.Baron-Cohen says...

I am not surprised...the staff there was awful
I am not surprised...the staff there was awful A.Baron-Cohen
  • Score: 3

4:49pm Wed 15 Jan 14

ChannelX says...

Hmm, this company was sending round agents offering 'amazing' deals for anyone who signed up and paid a deposit shortly before Christmas.

I fear a lot of people will have lost that money.

Naughty.
Hmm, this company was sending round agents offering 'amazing' deals for anyone who signed up and paid a deposit shortly before Christmas. I fear a lot of people will have lost that money. Naughty. ChannelX
  • Score: 8

9:22pm Wed 15 Jan 14

semitonic says...

Anyone placing their trust, financially or otherwise, in a company called "Bettaglaze" with that idiotic logo deserves to be let down.

Use a proper company.
Anyone placing their trust, financially or otherwise, in a company called "Bettaglaze" with that idiotic logo deserves to be let down. Use a proper company. semitonic
  • Score: -1

10:52pm Wed 15 Jan 14

Mushymushy says...

They were actually a very good company to work for, good pay.great benefits and the other workers were such Fun to work with.
They were actually a very good company to work for, good pay.great benefits and the other workers were such Fun to work with. Mushymushy
  • Score: -2

7:37am Thu 16 Jan 14

ChannelX says...

Mushymushy wrote:
They were actually a very good company to work for, good pay.great benefits and the other workers were such Fun to work with.
And now we know why they've gone bust.
[quote][p][bold]Mushymushy[/bold] wrote: They were actually a very good company to work for, good pay.great benefits and the other workers were such Fun to work with.[/p][/quote]And now we know why they've gone bust. ChannelX
  • Score: 2

8:14am Thu 16 Jan 14

public knowledge says...

FYI public I hear the same company are trading under the Window Centre which was one if there blue vans so pls be carefull when parting with your money
FYI public I hear the same company are trading under the Window Centre which was one if there blue vans so pls be carefull when parting with your money public knowledge
  • Score: 6

8:41am Thu 16 Jan 14

A.Baron-Cohen says...

ChannelX wrote:
Mushymushy wrote:
They were actually a very good company to work for, good pay.great benefits and the other workers were such Fun to work with.
And now we know why they've gone bust.
If you like heavily inked steroid pumped shave heads then this was the place, who would want them in their house or near their their cars?
Liquidation was inevitable.
[quote][p][bold]ChannelX[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Mushymushy[/bold] wrote: They were actually a very good company to work for, good pay.great benefits and the other workers were such Fun to work with.[/p][/quote]And now we know why they've gone bust.[/p][/quote]If you like heavily inked steroid pumped shave heads then this was the place, who would want them in their house or near their their cars? Liquidation was inevitable. A.Baron-Cohen
  • Score: -4

10:54am Thu 16 Jan 14

ChannelX says...

A.Baron-Cohen wrote:
ChannelX wrote:
Mushymushy wrote:
They were actually a very good company to work for, good pay.great benefits and the other workers were such Fun to work with.
And now we know why they've gone bust.
If you like heavily inked steroid pumped shave heads then this was the place, who would want them in their house or near their their cars?
Liquidation was inevitable.
Interesting that you, of all people, would make prejudiced comments about others based solely on their appearance...
[quote][p][bold]A.Baron-Cohen[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]ChannelX[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Mushymushy[/bold] wrote: They were actually a very good company to work for, good pay.great benefits and the other workers were such Fun to work with.[/p][/quote]And now we know why they've gone bust.[/p][/quote]If you like heavily inked steroid pumped shave heads then this was the place, who would want them in their house or near their their cars? Liquidation was inevitable.[/p][/quote]Interesting that you, of all people, would make prejudiced comments about others based solely on their appearance... ChannelX
  • Score: 2

11:12am Thu 16 Jan 14

Davey Gravey says...

Maybe if people had bought their product they may still be in operation?
Maybe they were trying to drum up work prior to Christmas in an attempt to save the company?

I know nothing of them but they are not the first firm to go bust are they.....
Maybe if people had bought their product they may still be in operation? Maybe they were trying to drum up work prior to Christmas in an attempt to save the company? I know nothing of them but they are not the first firm to go bust are they..... Davey Gravey
  • Score: 1

11:17am Thu 16 Jan 14

A.Baron-Cohen says...

ChannelX wrote:
A.Baron-Cohen wrote:
ChannelX wrote:
Mushymushy wrote:
They were actually a very good company to work for, good pay.great benefits and the other workers were such Fun to work with.
And now we know why they've gone bust.
If you like heavily inked steroid pumped shave heads then this was the place, who would want them in their house or near their their cars?
Liquidation was inevitable.
Interesting that you, of all people, would make prejudiced comments about others based solely on their appearance...
your sort of neighbours maybe....
[quote][p][bold]ChannelX[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]A.Baron-Cohen[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]ChannelX[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Mushymushy[/bold] wrote: They were actually a very good company to work for, good pay.great benefits and the other workers were such Fun to work with.[/p][/quote]And now we know why they've gone bust.[/p][/quote]If you like heavily inked steroid pumped shave heads then this was the place, who would want them in their house or near their their cars? Liquidation was inevitable.[/p][/quote]Interesting that you, of all people, would make prejudiced comments about others based solely on their appearance...[/p][/quote]your sort of neighbours maybe.... A.Baron-Cohen
  • Score: -3

11:42am Thu 16 Jan 14

ChannelX says...

A.Baron-Cohen wrote:
ChannelX wrote:
A.Baron-Cohen wrote:
ChannelX wrote:
Mushymushy wrote:
They were actually a very good company to work for, good pay.great benefits and the other workers were such Fun to work with.
And now we know why they've gone bust.
If you like heavily inked steroid pumped shave heads then this was the place, who would want them in their house or near their their cars?
Liquidation was inevitable.
Interesting that you, of all people, would make prejudiced comments about others based solely on their appearance...
your sort of neighbours maybe....
You were the one making prejudiced comments about people based solely on their appearance, not I.

Aren't you just the hypocrite.
[quote][p][bold]A.Baron-Cohen[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]ChannelX[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]A.Baron-Cohen[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]ChannelX[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Mushymushy[/bold] wrote: They were actually a very good company to work for, good pay.great benefits and the other workers were such Fun to work with.[/p][/quote]And now we know why they've gone bust.[/p][/quote]If you like heavily inked steroid pumped shave heads then this was the place, who would want them in their house or near their their cars? Liquidation was inevitable.[/p][/quote]Interesting that you, of all people, would make prejudiced comments about others based solely on their appearance...[/p][/quote]your sort of neighbours maybe....[/p][/quote]You were the one making prejudiced comments about people based solely on their appearance, not I. Aren't you just the hypocrite. ChannelX
  • Score: 1

11:43am Thu 16 Jan 14

ChannelX says...

@Davey Gravey


Maybe if people had bought their product they may still be in operation?


I think you may just be on to something there.
@Davey Gravey [quote] Maybe if people had bought their product they may still be in operation? [/quote] I think you may just be on to something there. ChannelX
  • Score: 2

12:35pm Thu 16 Jan 14

A.Baron-Cohen says...

ChannelX wrote:
A.Baron-Cohen wrote:
ChannelX wrote:
A.Baron-Cohen wrote:
ChannelX wrote:
Mushymushy wrote:
They were actually a very good company to work for, good pay.great benefits and the other workers were such Fun to work with.
And now we know why they've gone bust.
If you like heavily inked steroid pumped shave heads then this was the place, who would want them in their house or near their their cars?
Liquidation was inevitable.
Interesting that you, of all people, would make prejudiced comments about others based solely on their appearance...
your sort of neighbours maybe....
You were the one making prejudiced comments about people based solely on their appearance, not I.

Aren't you just the hypocrite.
If one is to run a business with gangster looking staff what exactly do you expect?
[quote][p][bold]ChannelX[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]A.Baron-Cohen[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]ChannelX[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]A.Baron-Cohen[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]ChannelX[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Mushymushy[/bold] wrote: They were actually a very good company to work for, good pay.great benefits and the other workers were such Fun to work with.[/p][/quote]And now we know why they've gone bust.[/p][/quote]If you like heavily inked steroid pumped shave heads then this was the place, who would want them in their house or near their their cars? Liquidation was inevitable.[/p][/quote]Interesting that you, of all people, would make prejudiced comments about others based solely on their appearance...[/p][/quote]your sort of neighbours maybe....[/p][/quote]You were the one making prejudiced comments about people based solely on their appearance, not I. Aren't you just the hypocrite.[/p][/quote]If one is to run a business with gangster looking staff what exactly do you expect? A.Baron-Cohen
  • Score: -3

12:39pm Thu 16 Jan 14

ChannelX says...

A.Baron-Cohen wrote:
ChannelX wrote:
A.Baron-Cohen wrote:
ChannelX wrote:
A.Baron-Cohen wrote:
ChannelX wrote:
Mushymushy wrote:
They were actually a very good company to work for, good pay.great benefits and the other workers were such Fun to work with.
And now we know why they've gone bust.
If you like heavily inked steroid pumped shave heads then this was the place, who would want them in their house or near their their cars?
Liquidation was inevitable.
Interesting that you, of all people, would make prejudiced comments about others based solely on their appearance...
your sort of neighbours maybe....
You were the one making prejudiced comments about people based solely on their appearance, not I.

Aren't you just the hypocrite.
If one is to run a business with gangster looking staff what exactly do you expect?
'Gangster looking'?

So, you are making prejudiced judgements on others based solely on their appearance? You're not only not denying it, you're actively stating that you do it.

I'm sure you'd not appreciate the same from others when they look at you and your family, for rather obvious reasons. In fact, I'm sure you'd be very anti the kind of people who might do that.
[quote][p][bold]A.Baron-Cohen[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]ChannelX[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]A.Baron-Cohen[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]ChannelX[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]A.Baron-Cohen[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]ChannelX[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Mushymushy[/bold] wrote: They were actually a very good company to work for, good pay.great benefits and the other workers were such Fun to work with.[/p][/quote]And now we know why they've gone bust.[/p][/quote]If you like heavily inked steroid pumped shave heads then this was the place, who would want them in their house or near their their cars? Liquidation was inevitable.[/p][/quote]Interesting that you, of all people, would make prejudiced comments about others based solely on their appearance...[/p][/quote]your sort of neighbours maybe....[/p][/quote]You were the one making prejudiced comments about people based solely on their appearance, not I. Aren't you just the hypocrite.[/p][/quote]If one is to run a business with gangster looking staff what exactly do you expect?[/p][/quote]'Gangster looking'? So, you are making prejudiced judgements on others based solely on their appearance? You're not only not denying it, you're actively stating that you do it. I'm sure you'd not appreciate the same from others when they look at you and your family, for rather obvious reasons. In fact, I'm sure you'd be very anti the kind of people who might do that. ChannelX
  • Score: 2

2:10pm Thu 16 Jan 14

A.Baron-Cohen says...

ChannelX wrote:
A.Baron-Cohen wrote:
ChannelX wrote:
A.Baron-Cohen wrote:
ChannelX wrote:
A.Baron-Cohen wrote:
ChannelX wrote:
Mushymushy wrote:
They were actually a very good company to work for, good pay.great benefits and the other workers were such Fun to work with.
And now we know why they've gone bust.
If you like heavily inked steroid pumped shave heads then this was the place, who would want them in their house or near their their cars?
Liquidation was inevitable.
Interesting that you, of all people, would make prejudiced comments about others based solely on their appearance...
your sort of neighbours maybe....
You were the one making prejudiced comments about people based solely on their appearance, not I.

Aren't you just the hypocrite.
If one is to run a business with gangster looking staff what exactly do you expect?
'Gangster looking'?

So, you are making prejudiced judgements on others based solely on their appearance? You're not only not denying it, you're actively stating that you do it.

I'm sure you'd not appreciate the same from others when they look at you and your family, for rather obvious reasons. In fact, I'm sure you'd be very anti the kind of people who might do that.
Would you be able to operate a business if the customers are not trusting your staff?
This is the same issue that you are raising with the Goan cleaners at GWH, you cannot expect miracles, it works both ways.
[quote][p][bold]ChannelX[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]A.Baron-Cohen[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]ChannelX[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]A.Baron-Cohen[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]ChannelX[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]A.Baron-Cohen[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]ChannelX[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Mushymushy[/bold] wrote: They were actually a very good company to work for, good pay.great benefits and the other workers were such Fun to work with.[/p][/quote]And now we know why they've gone bust.[/p][/quote]If you like heavily inked steroid pumped shave heads then this was the place, who would want them in their house or near their their cars? Liquidation was inevitable.[/p][/quote]Interesting that you, of all people, would make prejudiced comments about others based solely on their appearance...[/p][/quote]your sort of neighbours maybe....[/p][/quote]You were the one making prejudiced comments about people based solely on their appearance, not I. Aren't you just the hypocrite.[/p][/quote]If one is to run a business with gangster looking staff what exactly do you expect?[/p][/quote]'Gangster looking'? So, you are making prejudiced judgements on others based solely on their appearance? You're not only not denying it, you're actively stating that you do it. I'm sure you'd not appreciate the same from others when they look at you and your family, for rather obvious reasons. In fact, I'm sure you'd be very anti the kind of people who might do that.[/p][/quote]Would you be able to operate a business if the customers are not trusting your staff? This is the same issue that you are raising with the Goan cleaners at GWH, you cannot expect miracles, it works both ways. A.Baron-Cohen
  • Score: -2

2:53pm Thu 16 Jan 14

ChannelX says...

A.Baron-Cohen wrote:
ChannelX wrote:
A.Baron-Cohen wrote:
ChannelX wrote:
A.Baron-Cohen wrote:
ChannelX wrote:
A.Baron-Cohen wrote:
ChannelX wrote:
Mushymushy wrote:
They were actually a very good company to work for, good pay.great benefits and the other workers were such Fun to work with.
And now we know why they've gone bust.
If you like heavily inked steroid pumped shave heads then this was the place, who would want them in their house or near their their cars?
Liquidation was inevitable.
Interesting that you, of all people, would make prejudiced comments about others based solely on their appearance...
your sort of neighbours maybe....
You were the one making prejudiced comments about people based solely on their appearance, not I.

Aren't you just the hypocrite.
If one is to run a business with gangster looking staff what exactly do you expect?
'Gangster looking'?

So, you are making prejudiced judgements on others based solely on their appearance? You're not only not denying it, you're actively stating that you do it.

I'm sure you'd not appreciate the same from others when they look at you and your family, for rather obvious reasons. In fact, I'm sure you'd be very anti the kind of people who might do that.
Would you be able to operate a business if the customers are not trusting your staff?
This is the same issue that you are raising with the Goan cleaners at GWH, you cannot expect miracles, it works both ways.
Would you be able to run a country if the inhabitants don't trust the newcomers?

You're still defending the concept of judging others by their appearance alone. It surprises me that someone of your persuasion would support that idea, that's all.
[quote][p][bold]A.Baron-Cohen[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]ChannelX[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]A.Baron-Cohen[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]ChannelX[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]A.Baron-Cohen[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]ChannelX[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]A.Baron-Cohen[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]ChannelX[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Mushymushy[/bold] wrote: They were actually a very good company to work for, good pay.great benefits and the other workers were such Fun to work with.[/p][/quote]And now we know why they've gone bust.[/p][/quote]If you like heavily inked steroid pumped shave heads then this was the place, who would want them in their house or near their their cars? Liquidation was inevitable.[/p][/quote]Interesting that you, of all people, would make prejudiced comments about others based solely on their appearance...[/p][/quote]your sort of neighbours maybe....[/p][/quote]You were the one making prejudiced comments about people based solely on their appearance, not I. Aren't you just the hypocrite.[/p][/quote]If one is to run a business with gangster looking staff what exactly do you expect?[/p][/quote]'Gangster looking'? So, you are making prejudiced judgements on others based solely on their appearance? You're not only not denying it, you're actively stating that you do it. I'm sure you'd not appreciate the same from others when they look at you and your family, for rather obvious reasons. In fact, I'm sure you'd be very anti the kind of people who might do that.[/p][/quote]Would you be able to operate a business if the customers are not trusting your staff? This is the same issue that you are raising with the Goan cleaners at GWH, you cannot expect miracles, it works both ways.[/p][/quote]Would you be able to run a country if the inhabitants don't trust the newcomers? You're still defending the concept of judging others by their appearance alone. It surprises me that someone of your persuasion would support that idea, that's all. ChannelX
  • Score: 2

7:18pm Thu 16 Jan 14

triggercollecting says...

ChannelX wrote:
A.Baron-Cohen wrote:
ChannelX wrote:
A.Baron-Cohen wrote:
ChannelX wrote:
A.Baron-Cohen wrote:
ChannelX wrote:
A.Baron-Cohen wrote:
ChannelX wrote:
Mushymushy wrote:
They were actually a very good company to work for, good pay.great benefits and the other workers were such Fun to work with.
And now we know why they've gone bust.
If you like heavily inked steroid pumped shave heads then this was the place, who would want them in their house or near their their cars?
Liquidation was inevitable.
Interesting that you, of all people, would make prejudiced comments about others based solely on their appearance...
your sort of neighbours maybe....
You were the one making prejudiced comments about people based solely on their appearance, not I.

Aren't you just the hypocrite.
If one is to run a business with gangster looking staff what exactly do you expect?
'Gangster looking'?

So, you are making prejudiced judgements on others based solely on their appearance? You're not only not denying it, you're actively stating that you do it.

I'm sure you'd not appreciate the same from others when they look at you and your family, for rather obvious reasons. In fact, I'm sure you'd be very anti the kind of people who might do that.
Would you be able to operate a business if the customers are not trusting your staff?
This is the same issue that you are raising with the Goan cleaners at GWH, you cannot expect miracles, it works both ways.
Would you be able to run a country if the inhabitants don't trust the newcomers?

You're still defending the concept of judging others by their appearance alone. It surprises me that someone of your persuasion would support that idea, that's all.
Alot of my friends lost jobs at this company ,Yes it went wrong but it put people in work and when you have to pay alot of money every week for wages it's hard work please don't judge without the facts .Also Swindon adver made alot of money from this company .
[quote][p][bold]ChannelX[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]A.Baron-Cohen[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]ChannelX[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]A.Baron-Cohen[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]ChannelX[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]A.Baron-Cohen[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]ChannelX[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]A.Baron-Cohen[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]ChannelX[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Mushymushy[/bold] wrote: They were actually a very good company to work for, good pay.great benefits and the other workers were such Fun to work with.[/p][/quote]And now we know why they've gone bust.[/p][/quote]If you like heavily inked steroid pumped shave heads then this was the place, who would want them in their house or near their their cars? Liquidation was inevitable.[/p][/quote]Interesting that you, of all people, would make prejudiced comments about others based solely on their appearance...[/p][/quote]your sort of neighbours maybe....[/p][/quote]You were the one making prejudiced comments about people based solely on their appearance, not I. Aren't you just the hypocrite.[/p][/quote]If one is to run a business with gangster looking staff what exactly do you expect?[/p][/quote]'Gangster looking'? So, you are making prejudiced judgements on others based solely on their appearance? You're not only not denying it, you're actively stating that you do it. I'm sure you'd not appreciate the same from others when they look at you and your family, for rather obvious reasons. In fact, I'm sure you'd be very anti the kind of people who might do that.[/p][/quote]Would you be able to operate a business if the customers are not trusting your staff? This is the same issue that you are raising with the Goan cleaners at GWH, you cannot expect miracles, it works both ways.[/p][/quote]Would you be able to run a country if the inhabitants don't trust the newcomers? You're still defending the concept of judging others by their appearance alone. It surprises me that someone of your persuasion would support that idea, that's all.[/p][/quote]Alot of my friends lost jobs at this company ,Yes it went wrong but it put people in work and when you have to pay alot of money every week for wages it's hard work please don't judge without the facts .Also Swindon adver made alot of money from this company . triggercollecting
  • Score: 0

11:05pm Thu 16 Jan 14

public knowledge says...

triggercollecting wrote:
ChannelX wrote:
A.Baron-Cohen wrote:
ChannelX wrote:
A.Baron-Cohen wrote:
ChannelX wrote:
A.Baron-Cohen wrote:
ChannelX wrote:
A.Baron-Cohen wrote:
ChannelX wrote:
Mushymushy wrote:
They were actually a very good company to work for, good pay.great benefits and the other workers were such Fun to work with.
And now we know why they've gone bust.
If you like heavily inked steroid pumped shave heads then this was the place, who would want them in their house or near their their cars?
Liquidation was inevitable.
Interesting that you, of all people, would make prejudiced comments about others based solely on their appearance...
your sort of neighbours maybe....
You were the one making prejudiced comments about people based solely on their appearance, not I.

Aren't you just the hypocrite.
If one is to run a business with gangster looking staff what exactly do you expect?
'Gangster looking'?

So, you are making prejudiced judgements on others based solely on their appearance? You're not only not denying it, you're actively stating that you do it.

I'm sure you'd not appreciate the same from others when they look at you and your family, for rather obvious reasons. In fact, I'm sure you'd be very anti the kind of people who might do that.
Would you be able to operate a business if the customers are not trusting your staff?
This is the same issue that you are raising with the Goan cleaners at GWH, you cannot expect miracles, it works both ways.
Would you be able to run a country if the inhabitants don't trust the newcomers?

You're still defending the concept of judging others by their appearance alone. It surprises me that someone of your persuasion would support that idea, that's all.
Alot of my friends lost jobs at this company ,Yes it went wrong but it put people in work and when you have to pay alot of money every week for wages it's hard work please don't judge without the facts .Also Swindon adver made alot of money from this company .
Hmmmm and I know some who worked there and see how much the boss was putting in his back pocket along with others also ripping off people that's why they got out long before this company went bust
[quote][p][bold]triggercollecting[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]ChannelX[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]A.Baron-Cohen[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]ChannelX[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]A.Baron-Cohen[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]ChannelX[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]A.Baron-Cohen[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]ChannelX[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]A.Baron-Cohen[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]ChannelX[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Mushymushy[/bold] wrote: They were actually a very good company to work for, good pay.great benefits and the other workers were such Fun to work with.[/p][/quote]And now we know why they've gone bust.[/p][/quote]If you like heavily inked steroid pumped shave heads then this was the place, who would want them in their house or near their their cars? Liquidation was inevitable.[/p][/quote]Interesting that you, of all people, would make prejudiced comments about others based solely on their appearance...[/p][/quote]your sort of neighbours maybe....[/p][/quote]You were the one making prejudiced comments about people based solely on their appearance, not I. Aren't you just the hypocrite.[/p][/quote]If one is to run a business with gangster looking staff what exactly do you expect?[/p][/quote]'Gangster looking'? So, you are making prejudiced judgements on others based solely on their appearance? You're not only not denying it, you're actively stating that you do it. I'm sure you'd not appreciate the same from others when they look at you and your family, for rather obvious reasons. In fact, I'm sure you'd be very anti the kind of people who might do that.[/p][/quote]Would you be able to operate a business if the customers are not trusting your staff? This is the same issue that you are raising with the Goan cleaners at GWH, you cannot expect miracles, it works both ways.[/p][/quote]Would you be able to run a country if the inhabitants don't trust the newcomers? You're still defending the concept of judging others by their appearance alone. It surprises me that someone of your persuasion would support that idea, that's all.[/p][/quote]Alot of my friends lost jobs at this company ,Yes it went wrong but it put people in work and when you have to pay alot of money every week for wages it's hard work please don't judge without the facts .Also Swindon adver made alot of money from this company .[/p][/quote]Hmmmm and I know some who worked there and see how much the boss was putting in his back pocket along with others also ripping off people that's why they got out long before this company went bust public knowledge
  • Score: 0

10:08pm Fri 17 Jan 14

chelseaman41 says...

well the comment above boss putting money back in his pocket what a joke
i have windows by bettaglaze and they are very good the lads that fitted them and sale team all good lads they cant help what is going on and by the sounds of it some of the comments are rival companies putting the boot in why kick some one when they are down and all the facts are not known very brave of ppl to do so mmmmmmm could that be the company that sent a car full of heavies round to bettaglaze to warn them off back last year so before ppl make unfair comments and judge them no one wants to go under and take others down with them so just give give it a rest aint nice for any one involved
well the comment above boss putting money back in his pocket what a joke i have windows by bettaglaze and they are very good the lads that fitted them and sale team all good lads they cant help what is going on and by the sounds of it some of the comments are rival companies putting the boot in why kick some one when they are down and all the facts are not known very brave of ppl to do so mmmmmmm could that be the company that sent a car full of heavies round to bettaglaze to warn them off back last year so before ppl make unfair comments and judge them no one wants to go under and take others down with them so just give give it a rest aint nice for any one involved chelseaman41
  • Score: -1

12:09am Sun 19 Jan 14

public knowledge says...

no rival company here..... but someone who used to work for them so do know quite alot that went on in the back ground ...obviously your one of the ones who reset the company back up and yes was sad to see alot of people lose their jobs but thats down to 1 overall person ........ public should know they have reset the company in a different name so they can make an informed choice on if they want to go with that company or not......... I rest my case
no rival company here..... but someone who used to work for them so do know quite alot that went on in the back ground ...obviously your one of the ones who reset the company back up and yes was sad to see alot of people lose their jobs but thats down to 1 overall person ........ public should know they have reset the company in a different name so they can make an informed choice on if they want to go with that company or not......... I rest my case public knowledge
  • Score: 2

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree