Problem youth ban pays off in Square

Alex Pawlowski and Dan Ashfield policing the dispersal order in Sussex Square

Alex Pawlowski and Dan Ashfield policing the dispersal order in Sussex Square

First published in News by

MORE shoppers are visiting businesses in Sussex Square since a dispersal order came into effect last month.

Since April, more than 30 complaints have been made to the police concerning a group of up to 30 youths aged between 12 and 20 who had been gathering in the Walcot centre.

But on July 25 an order that had been signed off by Swindon Council came into force, giving police powers to disperse groups gathering in the square causing anti-social behaviour.

PC Dan Ashfield, beat manager in Walcot, said: “We went and talked to every shop and business in the Square and they all said they had seen a definite improvement in the area since the dispersal order had been put in place.

“Some have even said that they had seen an increase in the number of people coming to the shops in the Square since then.

“We also spoke to some of the residents who live above the Square who we spoke to when we did the consultation.

“Most of them were positive about the impact and said that it had vastly improved in the area and were quite pleased, which is a positive outcome.

“There have been a few dispersals but there hasn’t been any gatherings to the extent that there were in the past, and we’re not looking to enforce this in a particularly draconian way.”

The dispersal order applies to all groups of two or more people who congregate and are suspected of causing anti-social behaviour.

It does not mean that the teenagers who caused the majority of the problems in the area will not be able to use the space to meet but it will mean they will be moved on if they are thought to be causing a nuisance.

Debbie Estarbrook, manager at the Walcot Charity Shop and Library in the Square, was pleased with the impact the order had had. She said: “It’s been really really quiet, it’s so peaceful.

“People coming in have also been commenting about it, there’s no litter all over the place, and it’s just been really quiet.

“More people have been around too. I think the groups of young people could be quite intimidating, particularly for some of the elderly people, and put them off coming to the Square. It really has made a massive difference.

“Whether it will continue to be like this I can’t say. I’d like to think that it might stay like this and they won’t come back in those big groups again but I just don’t know.”

The order will be in place for the next six months.

Comments (5)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

9:51am Sat 16 Aug 14

Alan Bast*rd says...

Problem shifted. The problem people will still be somewhere doing exactly the same thing.
Problem shifted. The problem people will still be somewhere doing exactly the same thing. Alan Bast*rd
  • Score: 0

7:12pm Sat 16 Aug 14

house on the hill says...

Alan Bast*rd wrote:
Problem shifted. The problem people will still be somewhere doing exactly the same thing.
Ah yes but then its someone else's problem so they wont care! Same as when they evict a problem family and get them banned from the town, it doesn't solve the problem it just moves it elsewhere, always the easy option!
[quote][p][bold]Alan Bast*rd[/bold] wrote: Problem shifted. The problem people will still be somewhere doing exactly the same thing.[/p][/quote]Ah yes but then its someone else's problem so they wont care! Same as when they evict a problem family and get them banned from the town, it doesn't solve the problem it just moves it elsewhere, always the easy option! house on the hill
  • Score: 0

11:18am Sun 17 Aug 14

trolley dolley says...

The 2 posters above talk about taking the easy option.

Maybe they could explain what option they would take.
The 2 posters above talk about taking the easy option. Maybe they could explain what option they would take. trolley dolley
  • Score: -2

11:49am Sun 17 Aug 14

Alan Bast*rd says...

I would sterilize problem families and repeat offenders for starters. Wouldn't see the benefits straight away but would protect generations to come. Trouble makers should be removed from society so lock more up and put many who do not change their ways to sleep.
I would sterilize problem families and repeat offenders for starters. Wouldn't see the benefits straight away but would protect generations to come. Trouble makers should be removed from society so lock more up and put many who do not change their ways to sleep. Alan Bast*rd
  • Score: -2

10:18am Mon 18 Aug 14

Tonyblairisthedevil says...

Alan Bast*rd wrote:
I would sterilize problem families and repeat offenders for starters. Wouldn't see the benefits straight away but would protect generations to come. Trouble makers should be removed from society so lock more up and put many who do not change their ways to sleep.
This is an idea i welcome... Scum breeds scum so a quick snip and the cycle of scum is broken...
[quote][p][bold]Alan Bast*rd[/bold] wrote: I would sterilize problem families and repeat offenders for starters. Wouldn't see the benefits straight away but would protect generations to come. Trouble makers should be removed from society so lock more up and put many who do not change their ways to sleep.[/p][/quote]This is an idea i welcome... Scum breeds scum so a quick snip and the cycle of scum is broken... Tonyblairisthedevil
  • Score: 2

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree