News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


Charity calls for action on empty homes

Sammi McHugh and son Kai are on the waiting list and live next door to an empty home Sammi McHugh and son Kai are on the waiting list and live next door to an empty home

A CHARITY which campaigns to put empty homes back into use says Swindon Council needs to do more to rid the town of vacant properties.

The Empty Homes Association says there are many tools available to councils to solve the problem, including empty dwelling management orders (EDMO), compulsory purchase orders (CPO) and government grants and tax subsidies.

As reported in yesterday’s Adver, there are currently 2,139 empty homes in the borough – despite the council’s housing waiting list currently sitting at 8,363.

EDMOs allow councils to take control of a private property for up to seven years if it has been empty for at least six months, while CPOs allow councils to force the purchase of a home through the courts.

The organisation, an independent charity, says that Swindon’s empty home list is growing and jumped from 1,745 in 2003 to the current figure of 2,139. And 778 of those homes have been empty for six months or longer.

Henry Oliver says that often councils like Swindon don’t give empty houses the attention they deserve, even though the homes often provide a ‘solution going begging’ for long housing waiting lists.

Mr Oliver believes that sometimes the problem in bringing houses back into use amount to a lack of political will.

He said: “You don’t need money to help bring about change, other councils that are worse off than Swindon do so.

“Swindon can do a lot without spending money including naming and shaming, judicious use of enforcement powers like EDMOs and CPOs, publicity and getting the community behind their cause.

“These houses need to be brought back to life otherwise they risk becoming objects of hatred for the communities that must live with them and suffer from increased cases of arson and drug dealing.”

Mike Ash, Swindon Council’s deputy director of housing, says the council’s target is to bring 74 homes back into use this year – and 50 have already been brought back to life so far.

He said: “There will always be a proportion of empty homes in the system, what we don’t like is where we have people going for six months and thinking that’s okay.

“EDMOs and CPOs are long and drawn-out legal processes and they are designed to ensure fair play, so that the owner is given every chance to bring it back into use themselves.

“However, we are hoping EDMOs will be used more often now.”

He added that houses were left empty for a number of reasons, including the high cost of rebuilding dilapidated housing, property speculation, people who buy a new house and then don’t let out the old one and people taking time to sell houses they have inherited.

If anyone knows of an empty home they are asked to ring the council on 01793 464286.

Comments(18)

RFM says...
1:13pm Thu 25 Sep 08

"they risk becoming objects of hatred for the communities that must live with them"

- especially when the dregs of society get homed in a decent neighbourhood and take no care of the home they have been 'gifted'!

ItsPavAgain says...
1:17pm Thu 25 Sep 08

I think it's a little simplistic to say there are "2,139 empty homes in the borough". What areas are these houses in, what state are they in, who owns them?

Let's just say the council has to spend £1,000 getting each of these homes into a fit state. That's over two million quid required. If these houses are second homes, or private rental property awaiting tenents then I'm afriad we don't live in a Communist country and it's up to the owners what happens, not the council or some "charity".

writer says...
1:22pm Thu 25 Sep 08

As quoted by the journalist, the actual figure of empty homes is nearer 778 (can we really count a property that has been empty for less than six months??). 778 is still a considerable amount, and this has to be dealt with (which I suppose the council is doing). But in an area of nearly 185 thousand people, is this really that deadful?

dc the 2nd says...
1:33pm Thu 25 Sep 08

Yeah lets have a council compulsory purchase hundreds of homes, that wont lead to chaos at all or cost us a penny will it.

Jeez....

RF1 says...
2:08pm Thu 25 Sep 08

I sit here and wonder whether they've accidentally included my summerhouse and two garden shed in their 2139 empty dwellings.
If so I'd better not let the kids put the tent up in the back garden any more....

Big Mac says...
2:11pm Thu 25 Sep 08


“These houses need to be brought back to life otherwise they risk becoming objects of hatred for the communities that must live with them and suffer from increased cases of arson and drug dealing.”


I literally cannot believe what I'm reading.

If somebody buys a house and then gets a work contract elsewhere for seven months this charity is suggesting that that house will become a target of 'hatred' and almost deserve criminal damage.

What next, people who don't drive their cars much having them confiscated and given to people on benefits who need to get to the job centre each week?

Jesus wept. People who don't bother working in this country get free money, free/cheap housing, free health care, free dentistry, free eye-care, child benefit, free/reduced price school trips for their kids, free school meals, free taxis, free loans from social services and yet still want more for doing nothing.

If we now start buying up nice private flats/houses and giving them to people who don't work we are only going to make people think, 'what's the point of working if I can get a nice new house for nothing'?

Also, if housing is in such short supply, why on earth does this country still persist with a policy on uncontrolled immigration? According to government figures, 10,000 council houses were simply given to new arrivals in this country in 2007 alone. Those people have contributed NOTHING to this country yet arrive here and get given the front door keys.

A lot of things need to change, drastically, in this country - and soon - or we're going to wind up third world status very, very soon.


Lafyor Socksoff says...
3:01pm Thu 25 Sep 08

So if I work away from home for seven months in a year, these clowns want to give my house to a freeloader. This Nu Labour cancer really has spread and has deep roots doesnt it? Roll on 2010

RFM says...
3:17pm Thu 25 Sep 08

No, not ignorant but realistic!

Of course the majority of council tenants are good people. But I bet your bottom dollar/pound/euro that the houses that are commandeered will be filled by the typical problem families that give council estates their bad names!

The photo caption says "Sammi McHugh and son Kai are on the waiting list and live next door to an empty home". So she already has a home but is still on the waiting list? Can someone explain please? Ta.

scottyincs says...
3:20pm Thu 25 Sep 08

RFM wrote:
No, not ignorant but realistic!Of course the majority of council tenants are good people. But I bet your bottom dollar/pound/euro that the houses that are commandeered will be filled by the typical problem families that give council estates their bad names!The photo caption says "Sammi McHugh and son Kai are on the waiting list and live next door to an empty home". So she already has a home but is still on the waiting list? Can someone explain please? Ta.
Don't be silly, it's obvious why she's on the waiting list.

She's going to have 25 more kids and will need a bigger place!

The Artist formally known as Grumpy Old Man says...
4:29pm Thu 25 Sep 08

Actually, here's an idea - does that number include the large number of new-build, some of which have been empty for well over a year (never having been sold from new!). Should the council compulsory purchase those at a knock down price from the developers? I'd like to see them try it!

From Swindon And Proud says...
5:09pm Thu 25 Sep 08

I wish i could get everything for free :-(
Honestly i have to stop worrying about what my money is being spent on. All the tax that the govenment get off me from my hard labour while they sit and swig champagne at yet another office party on us, then get it again off me when i buy my shopping! If i worry about these things anymore i may burst.
Lets face it, there are always going to be people that want more from the council because the council just hands it to them on a plate and then charge us for the privalige. Life sucks...end of!

Bobfm says...
6:19pm Thu 25 Sep 08

Didn't someone once say 'all property is theft', would that mean SBC would be handling stolen goods, by taking these houses.

john c says...
6:33pm Thu 25 Sep 08

If homes are unoccupied for long periods (not just 6 months) their fabric does start to deteriorate. With this and the preserved housing shortage in mind would it not just be better if the owners were contacted and offered the opportunity to rent their property out rather than threatening them with EDMOs and CPOs (don’t you just love all these acronyms).

P3 NAS Mark II says...
6:57pm Thu 25 Sep 08

And what about people with savings? I mean, if all they're going to do is leave all that money in a bank, why not have the council force them to hand it over and dish it out to poorer people?

A lot of people buy property as an investment - I see no difference.

fineirish says...
7:14pm Thu 25 Sep 08

CPO's are largely used when local councils require to purchase land in order to put it to 'better use', i.e. large scale developments. An example of this is the Modus redevelopment, aka Regents Place. They are in the process of issuing CPO's to local tenants and landowners to purchase the land they wish to build on. In other words, CPO's are not issued to force people to hand over their property which remains empty for 7 months plus.

Bobfm says...
7:32pm Thu 25 Sep 08

As I have said before people are reluctant to rent out there properties to the type of tenant who is likely to be on the Council House list, because by definition if they had the finances in the first place, they would be renting privately.

If the law was changed which made it compulsory for the rent and rates to go directly to the landlord then I'm sure many would do it. The council would also have to underwrite any damaged cause, as a tenant in a private let would have to do.

writer says...
9:10am Fri 26 Sep 08

I think we should all remember that CPO's are the very last resort, and that there has only been one EDMO in the whole country (and even that hasn't been completed yet).

fineirish says...
9:10pm Sat 27 Sep 08

Writer - CPO's may be the very last resort, but I am currently waiting to be issued with one along with many others for the Regents Place redevelopment so they do happen unfortunately.

click2find

Most popular


About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree