Get involved! Send photos, video, news & views. Text SWINDON NEWS to 80360 or email us
11:28am Friday 16th January 2009 in News
By James Wallin
MOVES to close the Groundwell park and ride site have sparked the ire of commuters.
Plans set out in Swindon Council’s 2009/10 budget proposals suggest that the council could save £331,000 by mothballing the site.
But passengers say the effect on congestion and town centre parking would be unbearable.
Now a petition is circulating on the buses calling for the plans to be abandoned and for the park and ride to be saved.
Jo Marlowe relies on the service to travel from her home in Redhouse to her town centre office.
She said: “The road down to the Moonraker’s pub is already congested and this is going to make it even worse.
“The difference in price is going to affect me as well – at the moment it costs me £10.50 for a ticket that covers five trips, but if I have to park in the town centre it’s going to cost me an extra £40. And that’s only because my company offers a parking scheme for employees.
“I use the bus at peak times but it’s always very busy, so this decision would affect a lot of people.”
But Coun Peter Greenhalgh, cabinet member for sustainability, transport and strategic planning, said the choice is simple.
“We either make savings where we can or we put up council tax,” he said. “While the park and ride is an excellent service we are losing a lot of money because it is simply not covering its costs.
“The number using the service is not that great so I don’t think the effect on traffic will be huge.
“We have good parking facilities in the town centre and while this is not an ideal situation it is something we have to look at.
“This would not be a permanent move and hopefully there will be a change in government and Swindon will be given the kind of funding it needs.” But according to regular passenger, Rosemary Potter, the council should consider alternatives.
She said: “It is a disservice to Swindon and I don’t see why they can’t have the service running at normal times in the morning and evening and for the rest of the day have one every hour.
“People would get used to that.
“My daughter has got a two-year-old and when she goes to work three times a week she has to get a nanny.
“If she is now going to have to pay for town centre parking I don’t know how she is going to cope.”
Joanne Ord, who lives in South Marston, said the service was a “lifeline” to her.
She said: “I’m not sure I would have accepted a job in the town centre if I had known this would happen. I worked out that it would cost me an extra £108 to pay for parking in the town centre.
“I think the council should be looking at alternatives to this or they will have a lot of unhappy people on their hands.”
'Plan sends the wrong message'
THAMESDOWN chief, Paul Jenkins, has also criticised the plans.
He believes that closing the park and ride would have a negative effect on his company and Swindon.
He said: “We believe it sends the wrong message in terms of road congestion and tackling climate change.
“If the people currently using the service are forced to take their cars instead it will have a major impact on traffic congestion, which will cause problems for other drivers and bus passengers.
“Passengers have a right to make their views known on these plans.”
Mr Jenkins refused to comment on whether the plans would affect current negotiations over staff cuts at the bus company.
Comments(21)
PeeveD
says...
11:46am Fri 16 Jan 09
ourtone
says...
11:48am Fri 16 Jan 09
Moth
says...
11:51am Fri 16 Jan 09
The Artist formally known as Grumpy Old Man
says...
12:07pm Fri 16 Jan 09
The Artist formally known as Grumpy Old Man
says...
12:09pm Fri 16 Jan 09
Always Grumpy
says...
1:51pm Fri 16 Jan 09
Donkey
says...
2:47pm Fri 16 Jan 09
Chowmai
says...
3:00pm Fri 16 Jan 09
Donkey
says...
3:30pm Fri 16 Jan 09
john c
says...
4:55pm Fri 16 Jan 09
Always Grumpy
says...
7:04pm Fri 16 Jan 09
Donkey wrote:Blah, blah, blah.
I'm afraid it's the total destruction of anything promoted by the Labour Government and the previous administration which this, stop at nothing Conservative lot are out to achieve. Examples of this behaviour are throughout the borough.
Political hatred of anyone who does not pray to their God is far worse than anything I've ever experienced in many decades in what used to be a decent town!
They will not accept that certain schemes benefit the people they are supposed to represent.
Captain Sensible
says...
7:09pm Fri 16 Jan 09
John Smith II
says...
8:07pm Fri 16 Jan 09
PeeveD
says...
11:29pm Fri 16 Jan 09
John Smith II wrote:Yawn
Peter Greenhalgh said "The number using the service is not that great so I don’t think the effect on traffic will be huge". My opinion, as a degree qualified transport professional with over a decade of experience, is that this a hugely naive statement from a man who is the elected representative with responsibility for transport within the borough. I don't want to know what Mr Greenhalgh 'thinks', I want to know what the professional technical analysis of his officers tells him (assuming any has been done, to me his words suggest otherwise). As a regular user of this service my observations are that at least six morning peak time journeys are well filled with 30-50 passengers, most arriving in cars on their own. A conservative (if you'll excuse the unintended pun) estimate of only 25 additional private cars using the stretch of Cricklade Road from Thamesdown Drive to the Moonrakers Roundabout every 15 minutes (the current bus frequency) will add considerably to peak time traffic congestion on this corridor. If you currently drive along this stretch of road in the AM peak, consider how much further you will be back in the traffic queue if another 25 cars are ahead of you, how much longer it will take you to get to the Moonrakers Roundabout and then across it. The is bad news for all users of this stretch of the Cricklade Road in the morning peak. Users of the Park & Ride will have to find a possibly more expensive alternative, motorists will be delayed by additional congestion and local residents will suffer from additional noise and pollution from more private cars slowly passing their homes. Where the service 'loses' money for the council is in the off-peak periods when many fewer customers appear to use it (it is also run on a commercial basis by Thamesdown in the peak, so the peak bus operation element of the service is no concern for Swindon BC). Savings could be made by reducing the frequency, or combining the route with another. Some new market opportunities would appear to be: Operate the PM peak service later to allow rail commuters to benefit from it. The current last departure from the town centre at 18:45 means very tight connections off last trains from Bristol TM at 18:00, Paddington at 17:45 and Reading at 18:11. Any disruption to rail services could result in a Park & Ride customer stranded 2 1/2 miles from their car. The PM peak Park & Ride service could be diverted via the station forecourt for ease of connection. And there is a big market to go for, Swindon station car park has, according to First GW's website, 607 spaces and if I drive to it I am often struggling to get a space by 08:30. Combine the Park and Ride (901) service and the Hospital Express (16) to form one through route every 15 minutes, providing a more convenient alternative to Hospital parking for motorists and bus users from Northern and North of Swindon. Introduce stops on Park & Ride services at all intermediate Cricklade Road bus stops from the Park & Ride site to the Moonrakers Roundabout. These are currently only served hourly by the Stagecoach 51 to/from Cirencester. This may only be achievable in the off-peak, due to longer running times and heavy existing loadings in the peak, however has the potential to generate new custom. However if Park & Ride tickets were available from the waiting building (either from the member of staff or a machine) then loading of peak services at Groundwell would be faster (as many customers would not be paying the driver) and these stops might be achievable. Reduce the service frequency off-peak and extend the route to Haydon Wick (ASDA) giving residents of Pinehurst, Penhill and Queensfield a direct regular route to the Orbital Centre and those from Ash Brake, St Andrew's Ridge and Groundwell West a faster alternative to the town centre. Reduce the service frequency off-peak and use the existing two vehicles to extend the route to Blunsdon village, which lost direct services to/from Swindon town centre when the bypass opened and Service 51 was diverted away from the old A419. The alternative route from Blunsdon to Swindon town centre takes a tedious 33 minutes via St Andrews Ridge, ASDA Walmart and Pinehurst. As a cost saving alternative the off-peak service could be withdrawn entirely and the potential users directed to the hourly Stagecoach service 51 from outside the Park & Ride or the 10-minute frequency Thamesdown service 17 around the corner on Penhill Drive. This would be a negative approach however and when viewed as part of a bigger picture could see assets (the buses) parked up for longer periods of the day earning nothing and redundant bus drivers adding to the country's social security bill. Perhaps Coun Greenhalgh and his fellow members are not interested in trying to develop Swindon's public transport services to attract more custom, but would rather just hack out the costs? Successful businesses thrive when they provide a quality product that consumers want, not when they cut out cost and degrade their products (e.g Rover Group) - I suggest that our councillors seek savings elsewhere.
Chowmai
says...
9:25am Sat 17 Jan 09
madred
says...
10:39am Sat 17 Jan 09
Donkey
says...
10:41am Sat 17 Jan 09
Captain T
says...
11:43am Sat 17 Jan 09
daddikins
says...
12:32pm Sat 17 Jan 09
Worz
says...
2:20pm Sat 17 Jan 09
Andy Parsons
says...
7:58pm Sun 25 Jan 09
Find your next job now in Swindon and beyond
Search Now »
Make a date in Swindon now!
Search Now »
Swindon homes for sale and to let
Search Now »
Cars for sale in Swindon and Wiltshire
Search Now »
Comment now! Register or sign in below.
Log in with us
Fields marked with * are mandatory.
Or
Log in with