News RSS Feed


Email us your story, call 01793 501806 or text 80360, starting your message with 'SWINDON NEWS'


GWH takes action to reduce death rates


THE number of patients dying at the Great Western Hospital was one of the highest in the country because of a superbug.

The hospital had the joint fourth worst unexpected death rate, according to figures published in the Sunday Telegraph yesterday.

The figures from Dr Foster, the independent health information firm, showed that The Great Western Hospital’s NHS Foundation Trust, which runs the GWH, had a Hospital Standardised Mortality Ratio (HSMR) of 120 – a figure of 100 means results are directly in line with expectations.

But that figure has now been cut to 95 thanks to new practices of cutting down the number of patients infected by superbug Clostridium Difficile.

“The mortality rates quoted for the period 2006 to 2008 do appear higher than average,” said medical director Alf Troughton.

“At the time these were first published the Trust investigated the reasons why they appeared high and identified several reasons why ours were above average, which included incorrect coding and Clostridium Difficile.”

The hospital has been prescribing fewer antibiotics so less patients contract the bug, Mr Troughton said. It has also upped its cleaning standards to bring down infection levels and introduced tests for patients before they undergo surgery.

North Wiltshire MP James Gray said he was shocked to discover the Trust’s mortality rates were worse than those of The Staffordshire Hospital, which hit the headlines last week after it was revealed that hundreds of patients died due to “appalling” standards of care.

Mr Gray said: “I am very concerned about the statistics showing that the GWH had such a high mortality rate compared to other hospitals.

“I would certainly like to look into what caused this.”

Coun Peter Mallinson, chairman of Swindon Council’s health scrutiny committee, said he also wanted to find out more.

“It is disappointing to hear about this, but I would like to know the cause of the deaths,” he said.

“I will be asking for more information from the hospital. It is difficult to assess the situation until we know the exact causes of the deaths.”

Coun Kevin Small, a non-executive director at the hospital, said: “We have a monthly board meeting and the death rates are always reported,” he said.

“The numbers are going in the right direction.”

And a GWH nurse, who does not want to be named, said the statistics were unfair. She said: “I think the hospital does a great job. These figures can be misleading.

“Visitors bring infections into the hospital, which nurses would never do. Also sometimes patients put themselves in danger by not taking precautions before surgery.”

From April last year until this month, there were 72 cases of Clostridium Difficile and five cases of MRSA in the hospital.

Mr Troughton said that from April to December 2008, the HSMR at the hospital was 95.

Comments(8)

Jock Strap says...
7:56am Mon 30 Mar 09

Mmm! Worrying but at least it seems GWH have got a grip on the infection rates. Anyone else notice that our two elected MP's are strangely silent on this one - probably because there's no vote mileage in it!

Big Mac says...
9:55am Mon 30 Mar 09

The reason they're not talking about it is because they know full well the explosion of deaths due to Hospital Acquired Infections has happened largely over the last 10 years.

Over 5000 people now die each year simply because of infections and diseases they catch whilst in NHS hospitals for otherwise non-life threatening illnesses.

That's getting on for twice as many people as are killed on our roads each year.

Now, what do you think the government is happier to tell us:

"Speed Kills - around 225 people per year in fact" or "Our hospitals are so dirty and poorly run that they kill 5000 people a year"?

elfie says...
10:17am Mon 30 Mar 09

I have to agree with the nurse who did not want to be named. I have been in that hospital sitting for an appointment and watched at least 9 out of ten people walk in sit down and not use the hand gel. In addition, I witnessed nearly all of those people use the toilets and come out so quickly that they could not have washed their hands. People make me sick - how inconsiderate when they know how dangerous it is.

Robh says...
11:45am Mon 30 Mar 09

When my daughter was in hospital the hand rubs were empty. I queried this with a nurse and was told they due for filling in twenty minutes. I said surely they are due for filling before they are empty.

I filled in a form at the main desk.

A few months later I was there again and guess what they were empty again so I went through the same procedure.

I wonder if the same is happening now!!! It seems that they work on a time procedure instead of an as required system.

A similar problem to when I had a short stay there recently. A patient had an accident on the floor and the nurse was told but it had dried up before the cleaner got there nearly 3 hours later on her normal cleaning rota.

alkpurple says...
1:03pm Mon 30 Mar 09

what they dont tell you is that the numbers quoted are those who have died and had that put on the death certificate not the ones that contract the infection but unfortunately die from something else.

Big Mac says...
1:20pm Mon 30 Mar 09

alkpurple, very true. Even the government's own statistics state that over 100,000 people contract an HAI every year in NHS hospitals.

Of those, over 5000 are officially listed as dying due to the HAI, but the reality is likely to be much higher than that in terms of people who die primarily because they entered an NHS hospital.

Mick12 says...
1:22pm Mon 30 Mar 09

I was at this Hospital recently and witnessed that it was the staff more than the visitors that did not use the hand gel.

saul1664 says...
12:14am Tue 31 Mar 09

Robh wrote:
When my daughter was in hospital the hand rubs were empty. I queried this with a nurse and was told they due for filling in twenty minutes. I said surely they are due for filling before they are empty.

I filled in a form at the main desk.

A few months later I was there again and guess what they were empty again so I went through the same procedure.

I wonder if the same is happening now!!! It seems that they work on a time procedure instead of an as required system.

A similar problem to when I had a short stay there recently. A patient had an accident on the floor and the nurse was told but it had dried up before the cleaner got there nearly 3 hours later on her normal cleaning rota.
All services apart from medical runs are run by Carillon, who own the hospital and lease it out to the NHS. They supply the cleaners and their policy is not to clean up any bodily fluids, i.e. vomit, urine, faeces, blood. That responsibility goes to either the nurse or health care assistance. Once that has been done, then the cleaners will clean up the residue that is left.


Most popular


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses