Professor looks at relationship between Britain and USA

Professor Kathleen Burk at the Swindon Festival of Literature

Professor Kathleen Burk at the Swindon Festival of Literature

First published in News Swindon Advertiser: Photograph of the Author by

THE special relationship between the United States of America and Great Britain was brought out through history.

Professor Kathleen Burk, who was brought up in California but then educated in Oxford, gave an overview of how the two countries, though different, shared many traits.

The talk at the Swindon Festival of Literature’s lunchtime session yesterday coincided with the historian and author’s latest book Old World, New World which encompasses Anglo-American history from 1497 to 2003.

Having just flown in from Norway that morning, Professor Burk gave a chronological overview of that period from discovery and subsequent colonisation for ‘God or gold’ of America through to the Cold War and beyond. She also explained how the First World War had been responsible for the reversal in the balance of power between the two nations from Britain and its empire to how it is today.

It was, she said, the United States of America’s reluctance to get involved in the conflict that had given it a unique and beneficial position as an armament supplier.

She made the point that no matter who sits in the White House or in Downing Street intelligence and bureaucracy will continue and that the countries were linked principally by shared aspirations that might prove impossible to live up to, but that at least one could be proud of.

Due to the sheer length of the period of time she was covering, Professor Burk was unable to go into any real depth on issues she raised, which could be slightly frustrating though she spoke with complete authority.

However, what she did say was tantalising and the insights she offered drew on all aspects of history from economic to social, which made complicated moments in history understandable.

Unfortunately the numerous questions that such a talk provokes were largely left unanswered because time ran short.

Comments (2)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

3:54pm Wed 6 May 09

daddikins says...

I can't help wondering if the questions were left unanswered because "time ran out" or it would have been too awkward to answer them
I can't help wondering if the questions were left unanswered because "time ran out" or it would have been too awkward to answer them daddikins
  • Score: 0

4:45pm Wed 6 May 09

The Librarian says Oook says...

“It was, she said, the United States of America’s reluctance to get involved in the conflict that had given it a unique and beneficial position as an armament supplier”



You aren’t joking. The US had 26 wonderfully profitable months packaging up any redundant rust-buckets that could limp across the Atlantic and charging us full wack for them because they knew we were desperate.

If it wasn’t for the Japanese Empire giving them a solid kicking at Pearl Harbour they would probably be doing it still.
“It was, she said, the United States of America’s reluctance to get involved in the conflict that had given it a unique and beneficial position as an armament supplier” You aren’t joking. The US had 26 wonderfully profitable months packaging up any redundant rust-buckets that could limp across the Atlantic and charging us full wack for them because they knew we were desperate. If it wasn’t for the Japanese Empire giving them a solid kicking at Pearl Harbour they would probably be doing it still. The Librarian says Oook
  • Score: 0

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree