Get involved! Send photos, video, news & views. Text SWINDON NEWS to 80360 or email us
9:50pm Tuesday 19th January 2010 in News
By James Wallin
AN “incinerator” planned for Cheney Manor would produce enough energy to power 6,000 homes.
An £8.3m waste treatment solution could be up and running within two years if a proposal is approved by councillors at tonight’s cabinet meeting.
Three small-scale units would be built near the Waterside Park recycling centre, in Cheney Manor Industrial Estate, to tackle the town’s non-recyclable waste.
If successful Swindon would be the first local authority to use the technology.
Richard Fisher, the head of waste management at Swindon Council, said: “The difference between this and an incinerator is the same as the difference between a microwave and a log burner.
“This is a thermal treatment system that produces gas rather than heat and flames. That gas can then be used to make electricity.
“The energy produced by each module will be about a megawatt, which is enough to power 2,000 homes. As we would have three modules that would mean we could power 6,000 homes.”
The system would initially cost the council slightly more than it pays to send rubbish to landfill but should eventually save money.
Over the next 10 years the new system would cost the council £54m as opposed to the £80m cost of doing nothing, said Mr Fisher. This is a combination of fines for not hitting Government targets on reducing the amount of rubbish sent to landfilll, increased landfill taxes and haulage costs, among other costs.
Mr Fisher said: “We have also estimated that there is a potential income of £10m over that period so this is a sensible investment for the council.
“We are obliged to reduce the amount of waste we are sending to landfill and, after looking into all the options, we have concluded this is the best long-term solution for the council and for the town.”
But Green Party parliamentary candidate Chris Goodall cast doubt on the scheme saying that “gasification” was a “lazy” way of tackling the landfill problem.
He said: “There is still huge scope for encouraging people to reduce the amount of waste they are putting in the bin. The problem with facilities such as these is that councils generally get tied into long contracts where they are obliged to provide a certain amount of waste.
“There is now very little waste that cannot be recycled so firstly the council could be opening itself up to fines if it cannot meet those targets and I’m also dubious they will get enough waste to power 6,000 homes.
“From an environmental point gasifiers are far better than incinerators but it is still a lazy way of tackling the problem.”
Comments(32)
itsamess
says...
6:53am Wed 20 Jan 10
Meldrews Dad
says...
8:54am Wed 20 Jan 10
Bobfm
says...
9:01am Wed 20 Jan 10
vladdy
says...
9:41am Wed 20 Jan 10
Des Moffatt
says...
9:43am Wed 20 Jan 10
Bobfm
says...
9:54am Wed 20 Jan 10
Support_British_Manufacturing
says...
10:46am Wed 20 Jan 10
Grimwald
says...
10:50am Wed 20 Jan 10
Bobfm
says...
11:01am Wed 20 Jan 10
Casual Observer
says...
11:11am Wed 20 Jan 10
itsamess
says...
11:15am Wed 20 Jan 10
itsamess
says...
11:25am Wed 20 Jan 10
Bobfm
says...
12:05pm Wed 20 Jan 10
vladdy
says...
12:39pm Wed 20 Jan 10
itsamess
says...
1:07pm Wed 20 Jan 10
Casual Observer
says...
1:16pm Wed 20 Jan 10
Bobfm
says...
1:24pm Wed 20 Jan 10
Bobfm
says...
1:29pm Wed 20 Jan 10
vladdy
says...
1:51pm Wed 20 Jan 10
IzzyP
says...
2:49pm Wed 20 Jan 10
Mr_Big
says...
3:01pm Wed 20 Jan 10
Grimwald
says...
3:36pm Wed 20 Jan 10
Grimwald
says...
3:40pm Wed 20 Jan 10
Bobfm wrote:ok Bob, I am not suprised you support this Conservative idea as you are so friendly with Justin Tomlinson you seem to have lost your objectivety as a politician. Do you recycle your bottles in your pub so why deny other people that opportunity?
Grimwald, you are right if recycling was the real objective then are are other ways of achieving it. Return to re-usable bottles, for beer, milk, soft drinks etc. That would recycle millions of tons without the excessive cost or 'melting' etc. As for this method of 'incineration' as it says there is little or no emissions so does not add to CO2 emissions, even if they were a problem, which of course post East Anglia we know for certain they are not.
itsamess
says...
5:22pm Wed 20 Jan 10
Bobfm
says...
5:55pm Wed 20 Jan 10
I Too
says...
7:24pm Wed 20 Jan 10
Captain Sensible
says...
9:51am Thu 21 Jan 10
Mr_Big
says...
2:05pm Thu 21 Jan 10
I Too wrote:Your breath produces more acrid fumes than an incinerator ever would!
Wow! We've got a spare £8 million. That is a nice surprise. Not as nice as learning that, it's possible to burn plastics, without producing acrid fumes though. Today is a great day. I'm off for a swim now, in Swindon centre canal basin.
Bobfm
says...
5:47pm Thu 21 Jan 10
I Too
says...
9:07pm Thu 21 Jan 10
prole
says...
10:28pm Thu 21 Jan 10
Find your next job now in Swindon and beyond
Search Now »
Make a date in Swindon now!
Search Now »
Swindon homes for sale and to let
Search Now »
Cars for sale in Swindon and Wiltshire
Search Now »
Janais is back says...
12:20am Wed 20 Jan 10
How much extra will the Council Tax Payers have to cough up for getting rid of the rubbish generated by the non Tax payers?