News RSS Feed


Email us your story, call 01793 501806 or text 80360, starting your message with 'SWINDON NEWS'


Bishop speaks out on assisted suicides controversy


Take part in our anonymous survey on euthanasia

THE BISHOP of Swindon has warned that the controversial debate on assisted suicide is in danger of being hijacked by celebrities.

The Right Reverend Dr Lee Rayfield, who opposes calls to relax the ban on euthanasia, spoke out after a TV presenter made an on-air confession that he killed his lover, who was dying from Aids.

The claim, made by Ray Gosling on the BBC's Inside Out programme on Monday, is being investigated by Nottinghamshire Police.

It follows a separate call by author Sir Terry Pratchett, who lives in Wiltshire and is suffering from Alzheimer’s disease, for the setting up of euthanasia tribunals to give sufferers from incurable diseases the right to medical help to end their lives.

Dr Rayfield, asked about Mr Gosling’s claims, said: “When somebody who has a very high public profile comes and speaks about things, sometimes there's a different reaction than if your next door neighbour came on and said ‘this happened and I did it’. I wonder whether we need to be careful about the way so much of this debate is being led by celebrity figures.

“There are a lot of people who get in very difficult situations where they want to end their lives but as a society we don't just have regard to those people and their requests – we have a bigger picture.

“And we know there are many people saying at a point in my life, ‘I wanted to die and I would have asked somebody to help me end my life, and actually I pulled through’, from younger people to people who are elderly.”

The Anglican bishop, who is against the legalisation of assisted suicide, which remains an offence, said: “It isn’t just about one person saying ’this is my decision, it’s about the way I want my life to end’, because it involves all of us.”

Pointing out that some people were still prosecuted for helping others to take their lives, despite moves by the Director of Public Prosecutions to clarify the law surrounding the offence, he added: “I believe, my colleagues in the Church of England believe, and many people of no religious faith at all believe that the law as we have it is sufficient.”

But Sarah Wootton, of Dignity in Dying, said the Gosling case demonstrated that the issue could affect anyone. She said: “Crucially, Ray Gosling’s loved one was terminally ill and clearly asked for help to die when he was suffering unbearably at the end of his life. This illustrates a need for formal assisted dying legislation to help those who want choice at the end of life, as well as protect people who may be vulnerable to coercion.”

Comments(13)

Mr Blackwell says...
9:24am Wed 17 Feb 10

The church really has not right to comment on this matter, given that it was the church that criminalised suicide (the kind of laughably and ironically pointless action that the church often indulges in) in the first place.
.
There's far too much of a vested interest in previous religious dogma for them to contribute meaningfully to the debate.

Home Boy says...
10:19am Wed 17 Feb 10

"THE BISHOP of Swindon has warned that the controversial debate on assisted suicide is in danger of being hijacked by celebrities."
.
So now it's time for the CofE to have a go too? What an uterly pointless article!

politicrat says...
11:04am Wed 17 Feb 10

When an animal/pet is suffering and nothing else can be done we often say "humanely put to sleep/down"
Isn't it farcical we can't even apply this to humans in the same misery?
Our double standards and our hypocrisy could be funny if they werent so sickening!

The Woggler says...
11:18am Wed 17 Feb 10

Celebrity or not, bring 'em on. If it was up to people like the Bishop, there wouldn't even be a debate, it would just be "I say God says it's wrong, so it's wrong and don't bother arguing with me."

Bobfm says...
11:30am Wed 17 Feb 10

Whilst I fully support the view that 'we' should decide if we wish to die or be assisted if we can't do it ourselves, the Bishop's point is a valid one.

It is true to say that 'celebrity' involvement by it's nature can rather 'slant' any debate or discussion.

Home Boy says...
11:42am Wed 17 Feb 10

Bobfm wrote:
Whilst I fully support the view that 'we' should decide if we wish to die or be assisted if we can't do it ourselves, the Bishop's point is a valid one.

It is true to say that 'celebrity' involvement by it's nature can rather 'slant' any debate or discussion.
And religion doesn't?

politicrat says...
12:02pm Wed 17 Feb 10

Home Boy wrote:
Bobfm wrote: Whilst I fully support the view that 'we' should decide if we wish to die or be assisted if we can't do it ourselves, the Bishop's point is a valid one. It is true to say that 'celebrity' involvement by it's nature can rather 'slant' any debate or discussion.
And religion doesn't?
how about having a vote on the issue?

Bobfm says...
12:40pm Wed 17 Feb 10

HB, except in devote followers no where near the 'celebrity' effect, these days.

Veggie says...
1:59pm Wed 17 Feb 10

This should be down to choice - the choice of the person dying and the person who will assist them. Whe we put an animal to sleep we don't ask them we just do what we think is for the best - taking the pain and suffering away. Yet, when a person screams for help and is in utter agony we are not allowed to help them in the same way. Why? Who makes these crazy rules?

old cronish says...
2:06pm Wed 17 Feb 10

Bobfm wrote:
Whilst I fully support the view that 'we' should decide if we wish to die or be assisted if we can't do it ourselves, the Bishop's point is a valid one. It is true to say that 'celebrity' involvement by it's nature can rather 'slant' any debate or discussion.
The 'celebrity' involvement in this case is a human being who has had to watch a loved one suffer greatly whilst slowly dying of an incurable illness...Yes this can 'slant' a debate in the sense it is more high profile and therefore getting the publicity, well good, this is from someone who has a valid reason for wanting the law changed!

PaulD says...
6:40pm Wed 17 Feb 10

TRL - well said

Bobfm says...
6:44pm Wed 17 Feb 10

OC I support a change in the law, my first post says so, but I do worry that 'celebrity' tends to be the focus, not the cause.

The guy who killed his partner has now been arrested for murder. Now should he be tried as a 'Criminal' or as a 'Celebrity'. I suspect it will be the latter. I am not suggesting he should stand trial if it can be shown his actions were the actions of someone who cared.

Mr Blackwell says...
1:55pm Thu 18 Feb 10

Bobfm wrote:
HB, except in devote followers no where near the 'celebrity' effect, these days.
I disagree. Many religious people will toe the 'official line' with very little of their own thought involved, even fairly moderate believers.
.
However, the types of people who blindly follow the views of celebrities are not the same types of people who ever give topics such as assisted suicide any real thought.
.
Never underestimate the power and control that religion still holds, even in this country.


Most popular


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses