News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


Email us your story, call 01793 501806 or text 80360, starting your message with 'SWINDON NEWS'


Tories defend ashcroft cash


CONSERVATIVES in Swindon have rebuffed calls to return political funding linked to controversial donor Lord Ashcroft.

Tory Robert Buckland, who is to challenge Labour MP Anne Snelgrove in South Swindon at the general election, confirmed his local party had received “thousands of pounds” from a central election fighting fund, to which the Conservative deputy chairman has been a major contributor.

Lord Ashcroft announced last week that he enjoyed non-dom status – enabling him to legally avoid paying UK tax on his extensive overseas earnings – apparently at odds with Tory assurances when he was given a seat in the House of Lords a decade ago.

The peer, pictured, who has donated £4.5m to the Tory Party and plays a key role in its election strategy, has been accused by opposition politicians of avoiding £100m of tax in the UK.

Accounts filed by the Swindon Conservatives to the Electoral Commission suggest they received a total of £31,592 from Tory central office between 2007 and 2008.

Mr Buckland accepted that the party’s campaigns in both south and north Swindon had received “thousands of pounds” for leaflets and newspapers from a central fund to which Lord Ashcroft had contributed a “tiny fraction”.

The disclosure prompted Ms Snelgrove to demand Swindon Tories “pay back” any campaign money linked to Lord Ashcroft.

She said: “I am glad that Mr Buckland has come clean about how he is paying for his glossy leaflets with donations from Lord Ashcroft. He needs to know that the people of Swindon will not let this election be bought by someone who avoids paying tax.”

North Swindon MP Michael Wills called on the Tories to say exactly how much they had received from Lord Ashcroft's fund for marginal seats.

He said: “I have always been led to believe that all the [Tories’] money was raised locally and this now appears not to be true. We now know that instead of Lord Ashcroft paying a full amount of tax in this country, which could have funded schools and hospitals in Swindon, he has been funding Conservative Party propaganda in the town.”

But Mr Buckland said the donations simply went some way to “off-setting the huge financial advantage enjoyed by incumbent MPs” through the £10,400 publicly-funded annual communications allowance.

And he insisted everything the party had done locally in the past couple of months had been funded locally and accused Labour of “hypocrisy” because some of its own donors – including Lord Paul – were also non-doms.

Comments(18)

peatmoor pirate says...
3:49pm Wed 10 Mar 10

Perhaps Labour can tell us how much money is contributed by trade unions? As far as i'm aware Ashcroft has done nothing illegal so Labour should shut up. I used to be a Labour party member but I see nothing worth voting for in the party any longer. i look for reasons, I really do and i just find nothing.

northern_soul says...
4:54pm Wed 10 Mar 10

How about the trade unions represent over 6 million working people and Ashcroft represents who?

Billy Jo says...
5:43pm Wed 10 Mar 10

northern_soul wrote:
How about the trade unions represent over 6 million working people and Ashcroft represents who?
Trade unions represent the trade unions and the egos of those that run them.
They are parasites feeding off the low waged and hard worker. They take money from the workers to line their own pockets. They then give little or nothing in return. They have always been a blight on the general workforce and until the same wake up and stop feeding these groups of thieves and liars they always will be.
Union action has cost this country what was once a thriving and vibrant manufacturing market force.
For Shame.

Bobfm says...
5:48pm Wed 10 Mar 10

peatmoor pirate, is of course right there is a lot of mis-understanding, and mis-information about Non-Doms. It doesn't as has been said in the letters page mean, they are non resident, it means that they have oversees interests, and can opt to pay tax in the country of their company registration, if outside the UK.

They pay UK tax on UK earnings. As is rightly said, however all parties except UKIP of course, have such donors.

Jiver says...
5:59pm Wed 10 Mar 10

Are you saying "don't vote UKIP 'cos they haven't got enough finances"?

peatmoor pirate says...
6:09pm Wed 10 Mar 10

northern_soul wrote:
How about the trade unions represent over 6 million working people and Ashcroft represents who?
Sorry, unions represent their leadership in political contributions. if anyone believes all 6 million (if that is right figure) members of unions are happy for the union to support the labour party then they are delusional. Anyway, Labour haven't exactly covered themselves with glory when it comes to political donations in recent years have they?

Bobfm says...
8:01pm Wed 10 Mar 10

Jiver we have some quite wealthy donors and they are all UK based and pay UK taxes.

That's not to say of course that we wouldn't welcome other donations. Both the Tories and Labour are millions in debt, but will some how be able to bank donor money and not pay off that debt.

UKIP on the other hand is solvent, despite the best efforts of the Electoral Commission to ignore the LibLabCon funding abuses but take action against us.

Meldrews Dad says...
8:10pm Wed 10 Mar 10

Can we stop this rubbish about unimportant pr drivel from Mrs Snelgrove and get on the the real problems that need solving in the country?
How do we get back in to the black?
How do we stop the immigration that is overwhelming our country?
How do we obtain our freedom from Europe?
Only answer I can see is vote UKIP

Bobfm says...
8:26pm Wed 10 Mar 10

MD far from me to disagree. It seems only yesterday the LibLabCon at a Chatham House summit all agreed to push for Turkey to join the EU, potentially another 74 million people who could come to the UK.

The fact that only 5% of Turkey is in Europe. They were of course promising the same safe guards as with Poland, Hungary Czech Republic of qualifying periods for benefits.

Sadly they didn't work well did it.

doug on the farm says...
8:29pm Wed 10 Mar 10

Peatmoor, TU donations can only come from a Union that has created a political fund (by one member, one vote), or has voted to retain it. any trade union member has a right to 'opt out' from contributing to the political levy, and when I was a full time TU Official , I would explain the point of the political levy to every new member and if they wished to opt out they were given the appropriate form at once with no argument.

Billy Jo, Trades Unions are class organisations set up by workers to protect themselves from the employing class. Sorry, their officials, paid and lay, are not thieves or self serving, their job is to protect and promote the interests of their members. There will, of course be some bad apples in the TU barrel, I've met some, but they are few and far between.

doug on the farm says...
8:40pm Wed 10 Mar 10

However back to the article, It would appear the worthy in question has broken no laws and I would have thought that the Labour movement would have been better ignoring the issue and concentrating on valid social issues.

Billy Jo says...
11:14pm Wed 10 Mar 10

Bobfm wrote:
Jiver we have some quite wealthy donors and they are all UK based and pay UK taxes. That's not to say of course that we wouldn't welcome other donations. Both the Tories and Labour are millions in debt, but will some how be able to bank donor money and not pay off that debt. UKIP on the other hand is solvent, despite the best efforts of the Electoral Commission to ignore the LibLabCon funding abuses but take action against us.
Ashley Mote found a rather intriguing way of raising funds though.

Bobfm says...
7:55am Thu 11 Mar 10

Cheap shot Billy Jo, if you know the truth then your comment is clearly ridiculous. He had committed Benefit fraud, prior to being elected as an MEP which only came to light after his election.

He was immediately expelled from the party, never took his seat as a UKIP MEP, and just to show how corrupt the EU is, he was allowed to sit as an independent MEP when he came out of prison, pocketing an estimated £200k.

Casual Observer says...
8:16am Thu 11 Mar 10

I believe Nigel Farage has managed to cream off over two million pounds from the EU over the last ten years, on top of his £64,000 a year salary.

real -life says...
8:27am Thu 11 Mar 10

Politics = Noses + Trough!

Billy Jo says...
8:29am Thu 11 Mar 10

Bobfm wrote:
Cheap shot Billy Jo, if you know the truth then your comment is clearly ridiculous. He had committed Benefit fraud, prior to being elected as an MEP which only came to light after his election. He was immediately expelled from the party, never took his seat as a UKIP MEP, and just to show how corrupt the EU is, he was allowed to sit as an independent MEP when he came out of prison, pocketing an estimated £200k.
Not cheap in the least. He commited fraud BEFORE he was elected as an MEP?
Maybe YOUKIP could profit a little by doing some research into the type of fellow they put up. Or maybe my point is that regardless of political affiliation there will always be a few "grey" areas in the finances of some party members or the parties they represent.
Please do not try and convince us that YOUKIP is any better or indeed any worse than any other political organisation. The end fact is that virtually all politicians will eventually succumb to the temptation to gorge in the trough that we provide them with. The only hope is that some at least do something useful for us in between feasts.

politicrat says...
8:58am Thu 11 Mar 10

Billy Jo wrote:
Bobfm wrote: Cheap shot Billy Jo, if you know the truth then your comment is clearly ridiculous. He had committed Benefit fraud, prior to being elected as an MEP which only came to light after his election. He was immediately expelled from the party, never took his seat as a UKIP MEP, and just to show how corrupt the EU is, he was allowed to sit as an independent MEP when he came out of prison, pocketing an estimated £200k.
Not cheap in the least. He commited fraud BEFORE he was elected as an MEP? Maybe YOUKIP could profit a little by doing some research into the type of fellow they put up. Or maybe my point is that regardless of political affiliation there will always be a few "grey" areas in the finances of some party members or the parties they represent. Please do not try and convince us that YOUKIP is any better or indeed any worse than any other political organisation. The end fact is that virtually all politicians will eventually succumb to the temptation to gorge in the trough that we provide them with. The only hope is that some at least do something useful for us in between feasts.
British politics have been left untouched, unchanged for 100 years!
We have had a scandal about expenses, we debated about, and decided to change the syste, why can't we do the same with Political parties funding?
Look in France for example again! the french political parties are financed by the State (Ministry of Justice) and the amount they get depends on the results they obtain at elections.
Now this is a fair system, unfortunately this can not be implemented in the UK because of the current first past the vote system, unlike full representation in France, which also has 2 elected Chambers (unlike UK only 1), 1 Prime Minister (chosen by the president), and 1 president (elected in person) and guarrantor of the Consitution unlike our lame duck Queen, that serves no purpose.
We Brits have a lot to learn from the French.....

Bobfm says...
7:41pm Thu 11 Mar 10

Billy Jo, UKIP operated due diligence and a CRB check revealed nothing, given he hadn't been convicted of ant crime.

CO note for the first time you have got things wrong. The £2 million included 10 years of salary, £640 K. He was permitted £130k in allowances + additional attendance monies. The average LibLabCon MEP collected £357k a year, as against Nigel's £200 k.


Most popular


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses