News RSS Feed


Email us your story, call 01793 501806 or text 80360, starting your message with 'SWINDON NEWS'


Villagers concerned about Honda's wind farm plans


MEMBERS of a parish council have voiced their displeasure over Honda’s plans to built a wind farm next to a sleepy village.

Councillor Colin McEwen, chairman of the South Marston Parish Council, said the authority and many villagers are opposed to the car giant’s plan because it will create noise for down-wind homes and will create a “stroke effect”, meaning the blades will block the sun for momentary intervals at certain times of the day.

“We are happy that Honda are seeking to minimise their carbon footprint,” said Coun McEwen. “But we feel the impact on the local environment will be detrimental to residents.”

Honda, which began planning the turbines three years ago, is looking to control the ambient temperature in its factory – which was built on the South Marston airfield in 1985 – with wind power.

Coun McEwen said about 40 homes in South Marston would be affected by the turbines – which he said should be a similar size to the generator next to the M4 at Reading.

He said: “When Honda first announced this we asked if the company could move the turbines to the north east boundary, which would minimise some of the problems we expected, and initially they said they could do that.

“However, three months ago they decided to go ahead with their original plans, of placing the turbines in various points of the airfield, after consulting with Ecotricity, a green energy company.

“We were expecting our plans to be adopted, but now we fear that noise and light pollution may be a problem.

“As neighbours Honda are quite reasonable, but we are concerned about the conflict between their strategy and the local impact.”

He also said his hesitation on the issue was strengthened by “recent efficiency figures”, which he claimed were low.

Honda said the project was in the early stages and that it was keeping the local councils fully informed.

A spokesman for Ecotricity said: “Ecotricity and Honda of the UK Manufacturing Ltd have carried out extensive assessments of the Swindon site to ensure that a wind turbine project proposal is truly feasible.

“The findings show that the four turbines proposed have the potential to generate up to 13 per cent of Honda’s total electrical requirement.

“This is equivalent to the annual usage of over 6,000 homes and could save over 9,000 tonnes of CO2 a year, every year, for the lifetime of the project.

“As with all its wind turbine projects, Ecotricity will be working closely with Swindon Council, carrying out extensive studies and ensuring the project meets its ‘good neighbour’ policy.

“This means that if Ecotricity can’t be sure that a project won’t adversely impact its neighbours (people and wildlife), for the entire lifetime of the project, it doesn’t get built.”

Comments(19)

Brizzley4PM says...
1:18am Thu 15 Apr 10

I might run my bulldozer through south marston one day, it would be no great loss. Lets face it south marston is a grotty industrial area, a dogging area and not a lot else. A windfarm won't detract from the area!

Bobfm says...
8:09am Thu 15 Apr 10

I have to say that I do not believe that wind turbines are the solution to the countries energy needs, when being only 30% efficient, however if a private company wishes to reduce their energy costs I do not see a problem with this.

As for the residents objecting, I don't recall ever hearing anyone talking about it, let alone objecting.

As for the impact (blocking sun) again I find this quite hard to believe, South Marston is in a valley way below the Honda site and with the turbines standing several hundred feet in height. This seems very much a NIMBY reaction from Mr McEwen I am afraid.

AGINGER says...
8:14am Thu 15 Apr 10

To Brizzley4PM, yes, the village has been sacrificed,you missed out RAT RUN and it STINKS like much of Stratton depending on which way the wind is blowing,and, I have to live here.

Bobfm says...
8:20am Thu 15 Apr 10

AGINGER, why do you 'have to live' here. If you live in a privately owned house, you could sell, if you live in a council house, I am told there is a waiting list of those who want to live in the village

AGINGER says...
8:43am Thu 15 Apr 10

Proof reader required? what ever is a STROKE EFFECT surely it should be STROBE ie flashing light. The village itself is in a position with a setting sun to be directly in line at certain elevation and azimuth positions of the sun, I wonder if the researchers have looked at ALL of the possible effects it may have on the villagers.

AGINGER says...
9:07am Thu 15 Apr 10

Bobfm,its a little deeper than you realize, I am not one of the floating population,but have a birthright which has allowed it ,thanks to my forebears who settled in South Marston in 1820, and, their offspring still thrive,many other residents share the responsibility of being the backbone of the village way of life, they also contribute to the stability of this great country.

Bobfm says...
9:49am Thu 15 Apr 10

AGINGER, but if you don't like the place, despite your 'heritage' why live here. If I didn't I would move. I don't understand.

All my family have lived for generations in Walton on Thames but it wouldn't force me to go back.

Cletus_The_Yocal says...
11:59am Thu 15 Apr 10

Stop whinging, you should be happy that a companys trying to reduce its co2 footprint. Its got to go somewhere, theyve located the perfect site. Move with the times !

Bobfm says...
12:27pm Thu 15 Apr 10

Cletus_The_Yocal, I take it you didn't read the posts then. Not one is condemning the proposal.

Or was the post directed at the Parish Council.

reality_check says...
12:57pm Thu 15 Apr 10

Sleepy village? Isn't South Marston the site of a major national freight distribution hub, along with other industrial activities?

gonefishin says...
1:50pm Thu 15 Apr 10

Using the CO2 con to justify lower electricity bills is a bit disingenuous. Why don't they just say it'll save them money in the long run instead of trying to perpetuate the CO2 AGW myth?
What concerns me most about wind turbines is that no-one has done any serious scientific study on their ecologoical impact. Anemophilous plants, including all our cereal crops, depend on wind energy. Reducing the energy of wind (by sticking great big 'wind farms' in it) reduces its ability to carry pollen in the same way as groynes at the beach reduce water's ability to carry sediment. As far as I can see, the effects on farms and food crops have not been considered in any of these 'green initiatives.'

Captain Sensible says...
2:36pm Thu 15 Apr 10

Its not that badder place to live you've got a nice pub there called the Carriers Arms, and another one, the Carpenters Arms that used to be a lovely little rural beer house until Arkells bolted a motel onto it.

Bobfm says...
6:05pm Thu 15 Apr 10

CS, what a stupid comment, the motel enabled the pub to survive, it was been going down the pan for 10 years prior to a change of direction. It may not be the pub so many remember when 20 people made it crowded, but 11 years on we are still here, the Carriers in the same time has had 6 different licensees, do the 'Math' as the Americans would say.

Captain Sensible says...
7:35pm Thu 15 Apr 10

No it was ruined, it was a lovely little pub, no it might as well be a holiday Inn.

I Too says...
9:05pm Thu 15 Apr 10

Or some more flats?
Ooops! I mean luxury apartments

I Too says...
9:13pm Thu 15 Apr 10

Regarding the "strobe effect", don't people realise the sun is a million miles away. The light is dispersed over thousands of miles, across the planet.
The only way you could get a strobe effect, from the sun and a wind turbine, would be to put your head in a box, with the only opening about two inches away from the blade surface.
Also conversation, at a normal level, would overpower the amount of noise a wind turbine produces.

Bobfm says...
8:02am Fri 16 Apr 10

The pub itself has not changed in anyway. The motel doesn't impact on the pub, it simply supplies the increased revenue necessary to allow the pub to continue. Something which would have been doubtful without it.

Look around at how many local and community pubs have closed in Swindon, there have been 30 with the Swindon Borough region alone.

Pubs have to adapt to survive, that is the reality. We now do far more weddings, christenings and other parties than ever before. That is the way it has to be. The smoking ban and the high cost of on sales alcohol has largely been responsible for that.

AGINGER says...
9:24am Fri 16 Apr 10

Yes,the comments have now turned away from construction of wind turbines to the merits of a bloggers pub,easy free advertising.
Co2 reduction my foot,after seeing a Railfreight Depot constructed with rusty lines waiting for a train A flooded village,3 times in 18 months,where did the water come from? my thoughts are, from the industrial estates on higher ground,and now a WIND FARM that will not benefit the PUBLIC,only a Private Company,so I would suggest that any "Farm" should be positioned in front of the office ,so that someone can watch the blades go round when the wind is blowing.
The HGV,s moving from the Warehouses in the Railfreight Depot to a certain factory, and their Co2 output will need a big wind farm indeed to balance it out let alone heat a factory.

Bobfm says...
10:44am Fri 16 Apr 10

AGINGER, I merely responded to the criticism of my pub. If people don't want me to mention it then criticise those who start it.

As for the turbines, as I have stated I do not believe they will impact on the village at all. The likely water displacement of the bases compared with what's already happened would be tiny.


The wind turbines at Watchfield Villagers concerned about Honda's wind farm plans

Most popular


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses