News RSS Feed


Email us your story, call 01793 501806 or text 80360, starting your message with 'SWINDON NEWS'


District auditor clears council over wi-fi


AFTER months of scrutiny and allegations, the district auditor has said that Swindon Council followed the letter of the law in securing its wi-fi contract with Digital City.

The Conservative-run council has been locked in a bitter feud with the town’s Labour party over the deal and every council meeting which mentioned the scheme ended with a fracas between the two parties.

The scheme, and more importantly, the process that was used, has been cleared by the council auditor and the district auditor has said there are no grounds for a public report.

Leader of the council Rod Bluh hopes this will now end the division within the council over the scheme and that both groups can move forward with the project.

He said: “I am deeply disappointed that the Labour group on Swindon Borough Council has reneged on the agreement made between its leader and myself to draw a line under the process behind the council's loan arrangement for this pioneering scheme.

“Instead of being focused on the future of the borough and the needs of its residents, it is clear that the opposition party is concerned only about internal procedures within the Civic Offices.

“As I have previously stated, the loan arrangement was decided in a lawful, proper way after receiving advice from all the relevant council officers, including the director of law and democratic services.

“The council’s scrutiny committee, which was chaired at the time by the leader of the opposition, reviewed all the decisions and resolved that due process had been followed.

“The facts are that the council has been exonerated by all internal and external scrutiny bodies and that our opponents in the Labour Party have not produced one shred of evidence to back up their allegations. To repeat accusations without substantiating them is a form of negative campaigning that has no place in responsible debate.”

He added that the council’s audit committee reviewed the process and found that the correct process has been followed.

The District Auditor has also reviewed the case and stated “... I am aware of no evidence of an unlawful item of account and there are no circumstances which would cause me to consider the issue of a report in the public interest.”

Labour leader Derique Montaut said: “The main issue the Labour group has had with wi-fi is the decision-making process that was used to agree to it, as the Conservative leader of the council used a decision-making route that neither consulted nor informed your elected representatives of its policy until it was agreed and then published in this paper.

“The Labour group does not agree with this. We accept that being the majority group does give you the right to set the local agenda but it shouldn’t give you the right to solely make decisions that affect all the residents of this borough.

“Our second issue with wi-fi is the precedent it has set for future council deals.

“Indeed, the leader of the council has repeatedly been on record stating his belief that he did nothing wrong and would do things in exactly the same way for future deals.

“So to those who have said that the Labour group’s criticisms of wi-fi were all party-political orientated and wholeheartedly negative, I would like to point out that it is we who are making sensible suggestions about how this council can move forward and become more democratic.

“Finally, I think it needs to be stated that the Labour group do firmly agree with the merits of wi-fi and will be making sure that this scheme can be a very positive thing for this town and especially for those who would otherwise not have internet access.”

Comments(13)

Bobfm says...
8:05am Tue 1 Jun 10

'AFTER months of scrutiny and allegations, the district auditor has said that Swindon Council followed the letter of the law in securing its wi-fi contract with Digital City.'

Isn't that what MP's did, and that was a morally corrupt justification.

Billy Jo says...
9:22am Tue 1 Jun 10

“The Labour group does not agree with this. We accept that being the majority group does give you the right to set the local agenda but it shouldn’t give you the right to solely make decisions that affect all the residents of this borough."
ONE person did not make these decisions. A group of people did. A group that were elected. Clearly if we wanted the Labour group to make decisions on our behalf we would have voted them in.
We didn't so Cllr. Montaut and his merry band of losers should just slink away,stop being intentionaly negative about every little thing and try to form an opposition that might show at least a modicum of effectiveness.

Jock Strop says...
9:33am Tue 1 Jun 10

Well said BJ - in other words "Pipe down Montaut"

bampi says...
10:10am Tue 1 Jun 10

How is this WiFi thing performing?

What is the take up?

How much money has it generated for us Council Tax payers?

The Real Librarian says...
12:06pm Tue 1 Jun 10

Was there no room to include the apologies from all the people who have been slinging mud at the Council for the last few months?

Donkey of Langton says...
12:18pm Tue 1 Jun 10

Let's wait and see if Council Tax Payers do see a return for this in the financial statements. My guess is that money invested will be lost, as was the Big Weekend jolly for the Cabinet members prestige. It will be in the debit column and swept under the carpet as usual.

Well done Derique and the Labour group for seeing this through regardless of the outcome.

Opaque politics yet again from the Tories.

Grimwald says...
3:17pm Tue 1 Jun 10

This was never about illegality but what is in the best interests of the people of Swindon. With 13 Paying Customers allegedly does this represent value for money and please show me a bank who loan £450,000 to a five month old limited liability company without Directors Guarantees?
Judgment day will come and for Rod Bluh's sake I hope it works because if this money is lost he will never be allowed to forget it.

cash strapped ratepayer says...
6:17pm Tue 1 Jun 10

The objection was the suspicion that certain elements of the business community were exploiting their contacts with gullible councillors.
We will see what the take-up is and if the council and its ratepayers suffer losses.

gerrymander2010 says...
7:30pm Tue 1 Jun 10

Politicians, God luv'em. Let's just put a few things right:

The District Auditor has not exonerated WiFi:
He has not found it to be illegal, but that is where his investigation stops. He has made no comment on his opinion of the process, except to say that this will be taken into account in his next full audit.

Bluh did not take the advice of the Borough Solicitor: Quote from Scrutiny minutes:

"The Director (Borough Solicitor) had gone through the options in detail with Councillor Bluh and Councillor Mark Edwards, Cabinet Member for Finance and Benefits, and had advised that, in his view, the preferred option would be to refer the matter to Cabinet for resolution. Councillor Bluh agreed that this would have been the preferred option “in an ideal world” but he was not convinced that it would have satisfactorily dealt with his concerns regarding the “confidentiality or the speed issues” satisfactorily, given the situation at the time. "

It seems that Bluh knows better than the Borough Solicitor. Well there is a waste of £120K in wages.

Facts: Decision making process flawed.

Fact: Business Plan Flawed. 3500 residents and 1000 businesses to be signed up in year 1.
Result to date after 8 months, 13 residents and no businesses.

Fact: Conflict of interest with the MD of DC being chairman of (council funded) SSEP, on the board of SSP (chaired by Bluh) and was at the time on the board of SCS.

itsamess says...
8:34pm Tue 1 Jun 10

Regardless--there are still many queries as to how decisions were made and a company set up with taxpayers money and directors with conflict of interests. From the current take up and lack of progress it certainly looks as this business is doomed to failure.

reality_check says...
10:52pm Tue 1 Jun 10

itsamess wrote:
Regardless--there are still many queries as to how decisions were made and a company set up with taxpayers money and directors with conflict of interests. From the current take up and lack of progress it certainly looks as this business is doomed to failure.
As there appears to be no prospect of making any money from this scheme can it really be called a business?

gerrymander2010 says...
1:15am Wed 2 Jun 10

Just a little reminder:

"The first phase of Swindon’s Wi-Fi network will be switched on in Highworth in early December 2009 with the remainder of the project being completed by the end of April 2010.

Oops, Highworth can be seen as Rod and Rikki's Arnhem. A small town too far.

Rod Bluh, Swindon Borough Council Leader, said: “This is a truly groundbreaking partnership which will have real benefits for everyone living in Swindon."

Can't argue with that. There is 13 people in Highworth that are very happy with their highly un-contended
Broadband at over £34K a pop.

I Too says...
12:04am Thu 3 Jun 10

Scam-Fi.
Whilst on the subject, of wasting money..........
As the new water feature cost £240k, why didn't they spend a few quid of the money on buying a spirit level, to instal it properly?
What a bunch of silly monkeys


Most popular


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses