Swindon Advertiser'No more homes to west of Swindon' (From Swindon Advertiser)

Get involved! Send photos, video, news & views. Text SWINDON NEWS to 80360 or email us

'No more homes to west of Swindon'

A REVISED plan for housing in Wiltshire has recommended no further development to the west of Swindon.

The Wiltshire Core Strategy, which sets out the number of homes that need to be built across the county by 2026, reduced its proposed housing allowance to the west of the town from 3,000 to just 200.

The announcement will come as a relief to residents in West Swindon, including those in Grange Park, Peatmoor and Sparcells, as planning applications for major developments have loomed large for months.

An application for 800 homes at Ridgeway Farm, north of Peatmoor, is currently before Wiltshire Council while last week a Government-appointed planning inspector shot down a plan for 175 houses at Hook Street, near Lydiard park.

Meanwhile, the 200 outlined in the Wiltshire Strategy are already under construction at Moredon Bridge.

The lengthy document outlines the reasons for curbing development around Swindon – including the town’s own Core Strategy, which is also out for consultation presently.

But it does not appear to rule out Ridgeway Farm as a site for possible housebuilding.

It reads: “Currently there are 200 outstanding commitments at Moredon Bridge which have been taken into account in the identification of Wiltshire’s future housing requirement; no further allowance is made of west of Swindon development.

“The decision made in relation to the current application at Ridgeway Farm, West Swindon, could mean that this increases further.”

Swindon councillor Peter Greenhalgh (Freshbrook and Grange Park, Con) said he welcomed the plans but hoped for a greater commitment to prevent development on Ridgeway Farm.

The cabinet member for planning said: “I’m cautiously optimistic. Obviously I hope that the councillors in Wiltshire who sit on the committee take heed not just of the opposition in West Swindon but of the opposition in their own area and reject Ridgeway Farm out of hand.

“They look like they have taken notice of our Core Strategy but it has not ruled out building at Ridgeway Farm. I would have hoped they’d identified specific sites, as we have done, that were not designated for development.”

The strategy, which is set to go for public consultation, also detail 1,250 new houses in the Wootton Bassett and Cricklade area. Of these only 342 remain to be built or granted, while 283 have already been completed and 625 are planned for sites signed off by the council.

The draft document outlines a total of 37,000 new homes for the county in the next 15 years, which will be needed to match the demand created by an expected 27,000 new jobs during the same period.

Comments (9)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

4:08pm Thu 26 May 11

itsamess says...

Then it is time houses were built in other towns in Wilts--full stop.
Then it is time houses were built in other towns in Wilts--full stop. itsamess
  • Score: 0

5:41pm Thu 26 May 11

I Too says...

That Peter Greenhole sounds like a nice chap?
As he's so concerned, about Ridgeway Farm, I wonder if he'll take Coate (codenamed Commonhead) out of the Swindon Core Strategy .........?
Yes the one that he draughted!
That Peter Greenhole sounds like a nice chap? As he's so concerned, about Ridgeway Farm, I wonder if he'll take Coate (codenamed Commonhead) out of the Swindon Core Strategy .........? Yes the one that he draughted! I Too
  • Score: 0

8:17pm Thu 26 May 11

itsamess says...

I Too
Read the article again--its about the Wilts Core Strategy--not Swindons.
I Too Read the article again--its about the Wilts Core Strategy--not Swindons. itsamess
  • Score: 0

11:03pm Thu 26 May 11

I Too says...

Oooh.
I did read it

"Swindon councillor Peter Greenhalgh (Freshbrook and Grange Park, Con) said he welcomed the plans but hoped for a greater commitment to prevent development on Ridgeway Farm......."
Oooh. I did read it "Swindon councillor Peter Greenhalgh (Freshbrook and Grange Park, Con) said he welcomed the plans but hoped for a greater commitment to prevent development on Ridgeway Farm......." I Too
  • Score: 0

11:06pm Thu 26 May 11

I Too says...

And this bit

"The lengthy document outlines the reasons for curbing development around Swindon – including the town’s own Core Strategy, which is also out for consultation presently."
And this bit "The lengthy document outlines the reasons for curbing development around Swindon – including the town’s own Core Strategy, which is also out for consultation presently." I Too
  • Score: 0

12:39pm Fri 27 May 11

mr_fix_it says...

Nice to see some sense of reality coming back after the madness of the housing boom days. It's further evidence, if you needed it, that housing demand is simply a function of credit availability and developer greed. It has very little to do with actual local housing needs.
Nice to see some sense of reality coming back after the madness of the housing boom days. It's further evidence, if you needed it, that housing demand is simply a function of credit availability and developer greed. It has very little to do with actual local housing needs. mr_fix_it
  • Score: 0

2:36pm Fri 27 May 11

itsamess says...

I Too
The area in dispute comes under the
Wilts Core Strategy and under WCC
remit.
That is what the dispute is about as our Council will have to provide the infrastruture and get no council tax.
Besides several other projects to bring leisure to that area would fall by the wayside if the housing is built.
That is why our council objects to the building as well as the residents.
I Too The area in dispute comes under the Wilts Core Strategy and under WCC remit. That is what the dispute is about as our Council will have to provide the infrastruture and get no council tax. Besides several other projects to bring leisure to that area would fall by the wayside if the housing is built. That is why our council objects to the building as well as the residents. itsamess
  • Score: 0

4:27pm Fri 27 May 11

I Too says...

I realise the only reason SBC are objecting is that they won't get the 106 monies (a victim of their own tired development policies).
My initial post was to highlight the hypocricy of Peter Greenhole.
He "shows concern" for Lydiard and Ridgeway Farm, but promotes development for Coate by calling it Commonhead and putting it into the core strategy.
I realise the only reason SBC are objecting is that they won't get the 106 monies (a victim of their own tired development policies). My initial post was to highlight the hypocricy of Peter Greenhole. He "shows concern" for Lydiard and Ridgeway Farm, but promotes development for Coate by calling it Commonhead and putting it into the core strategy. I Too
  • Score: 0

4:35pm Fri 27 May 11

The Artist formally known as Grumpy Old Man says...

mr_fix_it wrote:
Nice to see some sense of reality coming back after the madness of the housing boom days. It's further evidence, if you needed it, that housing demand is simply a function of credit availability and developer greed. It has very little to do with actual local housing needs.
Precisely. At present there are no local housing needs other than social housing because no-one can afford to move!
[quote][p][bold]mr_fix_it[/bold] wrote: Nice to see some sense of reality coming back after the madness of the housing boom days. It's further evidence, if you needed it, that housing demand is simply a function of credit availability and developer greed. It has very little to do with actual local housing needs.[/p][/quote]Precisely. At present there are no local housing needs other than social housing because no-one can afford to move! The Artist formally known as Grumpy Old Man
  • Score: 0

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree