News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


Healthy eating versus fast foods

Christopher Mahon, left, and Harry Gibbons, outside McDonald’s in the town centre Christopher Mahon, left, and Harry Gibbons, outside McDonald’s in the town centre

RESEARCH is to be done into the idea of barring takeaways from opening near schools.

Swindon Council’s planning committee ordered its officers to research the idea and to report back in the new year.

The motion, put forward at Tuesday night’s planning meeting, is the brainwave of the committee’s chairman Dale Heenan (Con, Covingham and Nythe).

But support for the idea appeared to be lukewarm.

The issue, Coun Heenan said, was “within 400 metres (roughly a quarter of a mile) of school gates there shouldn’t be a takeaway as a point of principle”.

He said: “Officers will go away and consider what other local authorities like Liverpool have done on this issue, and will report back to the planning committee and the obesity task group from the health committee.

“The debate is still to come on what happens. I think there’ll be strong emotions on both sides.

“Half a dozen other councils are looking at it at least.

“It’s only a contribution, no more than that.

“The priority has to be parental responsibility, cooking good food, exercise and a healthy lifestyle, but the council and planners should look at alternatives.”

He said between 1995 and 2008, child obesity had increased from 11 per cent to 17 per cent.

Coun Steve Allsopp (Lab, Parks), also on the planning committee, said: “I’m not against the proposal at all. It does seem kind of a non-sense putting on healthy lunches in school, and then next door we allow a takeaway to open that gets all its trade from the local secondary school.

“It’s something to look at, but not necessarily as a number one priority. I don’t think it’s barmy. I think it’s something we should review.”

But cabinet colleague David Renard (Con, Haydon Wick), in charge of schools, said he had some ideological misgivings.

“I’m sure most schools would take the view it’d be helpful in terms of efforts to reduce childhood obesity if those kind of temptations were not on the doorstep of schools.

“I don’t like the state making decisions on behalf of people. I would much rather people make their own decisions, provided they’re based on the best information there is available on that particular subject.

“From an ideological point of view I wouldn’t be overly keen on it.

“But I can see there some potential merits. I certainly welcome the debate. For now I’ll keep an open mind on the subject.”

The concept has split opinion amongst shoppers in the town centre.

Claire Sparrowhark, 30, said she agreed with the idea.

“They should be moved away from schools, but my children go to school in a village where they are not allowed off premises and there are no fast food outlets nearby anyway, so there is not an issue,” she said.

But Lynne Winwood, 42, disagreed with the plans.

“I don’t think that it is necessary. School children are usually not allowed off premises and the school should be able to manage the issue themselves,” she said.

Glenise Hobb, 65, said: “Otherwise children would be encouraged to eat more junk food. But, if fast food is taken away, they will just go to the sweet shop instead.”

“Also, the kids are aware of the health issues involved with fast food, and so are capable of making informed decisions for themselves.”

Comments(7)

The Real Librarian says...
10:50am Thu 11 Aug 11

There should only be one group of people who take responsibility for what a child eats and those are the parents. A parent should be entirely responsible for their child and no-one else.
.
I am sick of reading about parents who take no responsibility for their children and an entire society who are expected to do it instead. We’ve seen the consequences of that this week in Tottenham, Gloucester, Liverpool and Birmingham.
.
Not long ago there were stories about dinner ladies policing youngster’s lunch-boxes and throwing away anything they objected to. If anyone did that to my child I would be livid.
.
Back on topic, I don’t want my taxes wasted on this rubbish. Councils already spend too much money on consultants anyway, and we don’t need to waste another £150,000 to get a statement of the bleedin obvious.
.
If the council do commission this report it will come back in a year saying that if a takeaway is sited near a school it is more likely that children will go to it.
.
If parents took responsibility for their children then that wouldn’t be an issue.

The Real Librarian says...
10:50am Thu 11 Aug 11

There should only be one group of people who take responsibility for what a child eats and those are the parents. A parent should be entirely responsible for their child and no-one else.
.
I am sick of reading about parents who take no responsibility for their children and an entire society who are expected to do it instead. We’ve seen the consequences of that this week in Tottenham, Gloucester, Liverpool and Birmingham.
.
Not long ago there were stories about dinner ladies policing youngster’s lunch-boxes and throwing away anything they objected to. If anyone did that to my child I would be livid.
.
Back on topic, I don’t want my taxes wasted on this rubbish. Councils already spend too much money on consultants anyway, and we don’t need to waste another £150,000 to get a statement of the bleedin obvious.
.
If the council do commission this report it will come back in a year saying that if a takeaway is sited near a school it is more likely that children will go to it.
.
If parents took responsibility for their children then that wouldn’t be an issue.

Hmmmf says...
11:12am Thu 11 Aug 11

"The issue, Coun Heenan said, was “within 400 metres (roughly a quarter of a mile) of school gates there shouldn’t be a takeaway as a point of principle”.
.
And exactly what 'principle' would that be, Mr Heenan? Or are you hoping this completely arbitrary nonsense will become known as "Heenan's Principle"?

The Real Librarian says...
11:50am Thu 11 Aug 11

QUOTE
Hmmmf , Swindon says...
11:12am Thu 11 Aug 11
"The issue, Coun Heenan said, was “within 400 metres (roughly a quarter of a mile) of school gates there shouldn’t be a takeaway as a point of principle”.
.
And exactly what 'principle' would that be, Mr Heenan? Or are you hoping this completely arbitrary nonsense will become known as "Heenan's Principle"?
UNQUOTE



Its probably something like the salt guidelines, that turned out to be made up, or the five a day guidelines, which are made up, or the alcohol consumption guidelines, which . . .you get the idea.

Of course too much junk food is bad, but this is something for the parents to decide.
.

Nothing is cut and dried. I had a chuckle last night watching June Brown chain smoke her way through dozens of kingsize on an episode of “Who Do You Think That you Are.” I’m sure her doctor advises her to cut down, but at 84, there isn’t much point.

swindonmum says...
6:10pm Thu 11 Aug 11

Simple, don't send your child to school with money! Most schools now operate cashless lunch payments. Again, it's up to parents to control what their chilcren do and don't do.

Robfm says...
6:22pm Thu 11 Aug 11

swindonmum, good idea, that would probably cut down on extortion also.

MrAngry says...
7:56pm Thu 11 Aug 11

@ The Real Librarian & swindonmum -I completely agree.

Also, they are only proposing to prevent new takeaways from opening near schools. Existing ones will stay.

IF takeways are responsible for child obesity this will change nothing. A better solution would be to install narrow doors so that the fat kids can't get in. The new doors could also be retro-fitted to existing takeways resulting in instant results.

Now, where do I go to claim my consultancy fee?

click2find

Most popular


About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree