Smokers take toll on health service

A TOTAL of 1,260 adults aged over the age of 35 are admitted to hospital due to smoking every day in the country, according to the Health and Social Care Information Centre.

In 2010/11, an estimated 460,000 hospital admissions were due to smoking according to new figures.

Of these admissions, 126,200 had a respiratory disease, representing one in four of all patients with such a condition.

Some 160,300 hospital patients had a smoking-related cancer such as lung cancer – more than one in 10 of all cancer admissions.

The new figures also show that from April 2011 to March 2012, a total of 36,226 people successfully kicked the habit with the cost per quitter to Strategic Health Authorities and Primary Care Trusts coming in at £172.

In Swindon, where 1,608 people successfully quit, the cost per quitter for NHS Swindon was slightly lower at £161 and in NHS Wiltshire, costs fell even lower to £138.

Nationally, statistics show that during 2011/12, 816,000 quit dates were set through NHS Stop Smoking Services; four per cent (29,000) higher than in 2010/11 (788,000).

At four week follow-up meetings, there were 401,000 instances where people had successfully quit, up five per cent (17,000) on 2010/11 (384,000).

HSCIC chief executive Tim Straughan said: “These figures present in stark terms the impact smoking has on people’s individual health and NHS services.

“The reports give an insight into the effects of this habit in England; from those seeking help to give up and successfully quitting through NHS Stop Smoking Services; to those needing a hospital stay for a condition associated with smoking.”

Earlier this year it was revealed that 17 per cent of pregnant women in Swindon remained smokers when they gave birth – higher than the national average.

NHS Swindon said Stop Smoking support is available in more than 60 locations in the town.

For more information and advice or to book an appointment call the NHS Swindon Stop Smoking Service on 0800 389 2229 or 01793 708751. Alternatively, text on 07827 954094, email besmokefree @swindon-pct.nhs.uk or write to NHS Swindon Stop Smoking Service, North Swindon District Centre, Thamesdown Drive, Swindon, Wiltshire, SN25 4AN.

Comments(28)

Oik1 says...
10:17am Tue 21 Aug 12

There's an awfull lot of quoted figures in that report, shame there's no figure that states how much money goes into those same coffers paid in tax by smokers, and no, I'm not a smoker.

And another thing, an estimated 460,000 hospital admissions were due to smoking, if those figures are estimated then it means very little and they are in all probability miles out, is that estimation based on the question we all get asked if you ever end up in hospital "have you ever smoked?" You answer yes, but I packed up in1948, it's still a tick in the smokers box on the stats.

Even Angrier Monkey says...
10:26am Tue 21 Aug 12

I'm not really sure what this is supposed to illustrate?
.
How many people were admitted to hopsital with sports injuries? - dont think for a second I'm anti sport in any way - but it illustrates how people damage their own bodies and the job of the NHS is to fix people not offer moral judgement on how they have done it.

RichardR1 says...
10:43am Tue 21 Aug 12

Two very astute posts. I have read that quitting is deemed to be two weeks out of four smoking free. How many of the quitters are repeats.

If a smoker does quit then in real terms it's cost considerably more than the figures quoted given the loss of tax on the cigarettes.

dc the 2nd says...
11:07am Tue 21 Aug 12

Gets into arguments with itsamess, interested in south Marston affairs and smoking! This is uncanny!

chas says...
11:14am Tue 21 Aug 12

How many of those smokers who 'quit' stopped smoking for a year or more? A very low percentage I suspect.

Robh says...
11:18am Tue 21 Aug 12

Of these admissions, 126,200 had a respiratory disease, representing one in four of all patients with such a condition.

Some 160,300 hospital patients had a smoking-related cancer such as lung cancer – more than one in 10 of all cancer admissions.

We know that smokers pay a considerable amount in tax but how are the others paid for?

Perhaps the NHS should get more if not all the tax revenue from smokers. If they did we would probably have the best health service in the world.

RichardR1 says...
11:27am Tue 21 Aug 12

DC seeking to have a rational debate is hardly an argument unless one of the parties seeks it.

As for my interests they are wide and diverse. Like 75% of the population I don't smoke but can see that this constant battering smokers take is totally irrational given the taxes they pay.

Hmmmf says...
11:39am Tue 21 Aug 12

According to this piece (regurgitated from the national news) smokers represent:

"...more than one in 10 of all cancer admissions"

"...one in four of all patients with such a condition."

So you're much more likely to get cancer (more than 8 in 10) or respiratory conditions (three in four) if you're a non-smoker. This is alarming, I gave up smoking nearly 5 years ago and now my chances of getting cancer or respiratory conditions have increased dramatically. They didn't tell me *that* when I quit.

I 2 Could B says...
11:48am Tue 21 Aug 12


Perhaps the NHS should get more if not all the tax revenue from smokers. If they did we would probably have the best health service in the world.

No, we most definitely would not. The NHS will never have a hope of being amongst the best in the world whilst we continue to adopt the current model.

Attempting to treat the entire world with money raised soley in this country is also a major factor as to why the NHS trails behind the health services of so many other nations.

Sadly, the utopian nonsense of a 'free' (it isn't, of course, it's actually very expensive) health service for anyone who wants it, and for any reason, is proving to be wholly counter-productive. Then there's the rather glaring problem that, along witht the rest of our demented welfare state, we simply cannot afford the NHS as it stands.

The Real Librarian says...
11:55am Tue 21 Aug 12

Oik 1

The last figures I could find are several years old, but they are from the ASH website, who admit that £10.5 BN was being raised from smoking and all the costs only added up to £4.5 BN, leaving £6 BN for the government to waste on illegal wars and fake asylum seekers and workshy chavs.

Bobfm , says...
12:09pm Tue 21 Aug 12

RichardR1 wrote:
Two very astute posts. I have read that quitting is deemed to be two weeks out of four smoking free. How many of the quitters are repeats.

If a smoker does quit then in real terms it's cost considerably more than the figures quoted given the loss of tax on the cigarettes.
Robert, why are you posting under RichardR1 pseudonym?

Davey Gravey says...
12:13pm Tue 21 Aug 12

Robfm the master of disguises.

Still About says...
1:00pm Tue 21 Aug 12

Now it is blatantly obvious that DickR1 is Robfm.

So why the change of log-in?

I presume The Adver moderators finally had the sense to ban him.

Surely they are intelligent enough to realise he has merely changed his log-in?

With luck he will soon be banned again as with most other forums that he blights

Robh says...
1:21pm Tue 21 Aug 12

Here we go again. The old who is posting as who.

WHO CARES? Try commenting on the topic or are you all brain dead and totally devoid of any opinions.

house on the hill says...
1:52pm Tue 21 Aug 12

Can someone please explain the attraction of smoking? It costs a fortune, increases your chances of ill health and premature death, make you look older and smell like an old ashtray, just what is the point????? Sorry I really just dont get it.

Even Angrier Monkey says...
2:05pm Tue 21 Aug 12

house on the hill wrote:
Can someone please explain the attraction of smoking? It costs a fortune, increases your chances of ill health and premature death, make you look older and smell like an old ashtray, just what is the point????? Sorry I really just dont get it.
All fair points.
.
But thats freedom of choice for you. Theres plenty of (legal) things I dislike but I dont try telling anyone else they cant do them

house on the hill says...
2:10pm Tue 21 Aug 12

I wasnt telling anyone else they couldnt do them i was just asking why they did it and what the attractions were. Of course they are free to choose, just strange you would choose to make yourself ill and shorten your life thats all.

Still About says...
3:10pm Tue 21 Aug 12

I've never understood the attraction.
Even more bizzare is that people do it whilst they're driving.

Davey Gravey says...
3:32pm Tue 21 Aug 12

Still About wrote:
I've never understood the attraction.
Even more bizzare is that people do it whilst they're driving.
Which should be made illegal

chas says...
4:05pm Tue 21 Aug 12

Two thirds of all ambulance call outs are drinking related. Should we ban all pleasures?

Still About says...
4:26pm Tue 21 Aug 12

Being drunk and disorderly is already a crime so technically it is already banned.

Mustn't start talking about alcohol though otherwise RichardR1 will demonstrate that he IS RobFm by pointing out that you're off topic.

house on the hill says...
4:42pm Tue 21 Aug 12

how is being so drunk you need an ambulance a pleasure anyway? Drinking can be enjoyable, drinking to excess is both anti social, unneccessary and life threatening. no one is saying pleasures should be banned, but excesses that cause harm to self or others should be.

Robh says...
7:15pm Tue 21 Aug 12

The total number of hospital admissions is over 12 million so the by my reckoning smoking related diseases account for less than 4%.

This seems a bit disproportionate to the percentage of people who smoke.

RichardR1 says...
7:22pm Tue 21 Aug 12

Robh well observed, as with most health scaring a closer analysis reveals the reality, with about 13 million smokers it is indeed a small proportion.

If one then analyses what smoking related actually means in terms of the statistics we find the truth even less convincing.

Still About says...
7:18am Wed 22 Aug 12

Smoking is bad for your health.

Anybody who thinks it isn't is an idiot.

RichardR1 says...
7:32am Wed 22 Aug 12

Smoking is indeed bad for the health of some but not the majority.

The gene likely to mutate caused by smoking has been identified, and thus with a relatively simple test those who would likely catch a serious health condition such as cancer could be identified at a very early stage.

They then could be told the real truth, not the concocted version used to scare through smoking bans.

Davey Gravey says...
12:38pm Wed 22 Aug 12

RichardR1 wrote:
Smoking is indeed bad for the health of some but not the majority.

The gene likely to mutate caused by smoking has been identified, and thus with a relatively simple test those who would likely catch a serious health condition such as cancer could be identified at a very early stage.

They then could be told the real truth, not the concocted version used to scare through smoking bans.
Everyonee who smokes over time will have their health affected. Every single one of them. absolute rubbish from you robfm

Even Angrier Monkey says...
1:57pm Wed 22 Aug 12

Its clear to me that smoking is not good for your health. This may not neccesarily mean life threatening diseases , just simply affecting your ability to breath , run etc. Its obviously not a good idea.
.
We all know that there are old people out there who have smoked 20 a day for 60 years and been fine, likewise its possible for fit, non smoking 40 year olds to get lung cancer. But clearly smoking increases the chances of a person developing certain diseases.
.
But there is also a lot of Bull sheet anti smoking propaganda (as above) concerning hospital admissions and the liklihood of a smoker getting seriously ill.
.
I want to see facts, not figures massaged to suit the moral lecturing of the NHS.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree