Pregnant women are still lighting up more in town (From Swindon Advertiser)
Get involved! Send photos, video, news & views. Text SWINDON NEWS to 80360 or email us
Pregnant women are still lighting up more in town
9:20am Saturday 1st September 2012 in News By Katie Bond
SWINDON has a higher than average percentage of pregnant women who are smokers at the time of giving birth.
New figures published this week show that 14.5 per cent of women in the town are still lighting up during their pregnancy, despite the serious health problems it can cause to babies.
Nationally, 12.7 per cent of mothers giving birth were smokers for the first quarter of 2012/13, which was lower than the 2011/12 outturn of 13.2 per cent.
The figures vary dramatically amongst all Strategic Health Authorities from 19.6 per cent in the North East SHA to 5.6 per cent in London SHA.
Among 147 primary care trusts smoking prevalence at delivery ranged from 27.6 per cent in Blackpool PCT to 1.2 per cent in Kensington and Chelsea PCT.
A spokesman for the NHS Information Centre said: “Babies from deprived backgrounds are more likely to be born to mothers who smoke, and to have much greater exposure to secondhand smoke in childhood.
“Smoking remains one of the few modifiable risk factors in pregnancy.
“It can cause a range of serious health problems, including lower birth weight, pre-term birth, placental complications and perinatal mortality.”
In Swindon, where nearly three out of 20 pregnant women continue to smoke, a new Stop Before you Drop service has been launched that helps pregnant women in the town who want to stop smoking.
Lisa Fendall, who was featured recently in the BBC series Mums Behaving Badly, launched the new service in Swindon, and highlighted the risks of low weight, weak babies, as a result of smoking in pregnancy, and the importance of supporting pregnant women to quit smoking.
Cherry Jones,the deputy director of public health for NHS Swindon said: “This new service provides a great opportunity for pregnant women to meet others in a similar situation.
“Stopping smoking is the single most important thing anyone can do to improve their health, and for a pregnant women there is also the health of her baby.’’ Each Thursday, there is a dedicated Stop Before You Drop group at the John Moulton Hall, in Penhill , from 10.30am to 11.30am.
It is just for pregnant women who want to quit smoking, and provides an opportunity for them to talk to other pregnant women who are also trying to stop, as well as having a trained stop smoking advisor available to offer support and advice.
Women can either turn up on the day or call 0800 389 2229 for more information.
Comments(13)
Davey Gravey
says...
10:33am Sat 1 Sep 12
Robh
says...
10:52am Sat 1 Sep 12
If they are telling us that the number of babies with serious illnesses born to mothers who smoke was higher than the average that would make the point. Otherwise it is just a statistic for the sake of it.
house on the hill
says...
1:01pm Sat 1 Sep 12
Jibberjab
says...
1:11pm Sat 1 Sep 12
Hmmmf
says...
4:50pm Sat 1 Sep 12
A spokesman for the NHS Information Centre said:
“Babies from deprived backgrounds are more likely to be born to mothers who smoke,
Babies don't have backgrounds. Especially when they haven't been born yet. And of what would any backgrounds they might later possess be deprived, exactly?
The numbers are clearly falling each time these reports are released, but the Adver still manages to spin that fact into bad news.
Jibberjab wrote:
I believe that smoking while pregnant should be against the law, and those found guilty should have there child benefit taken away.
Why? Almost one in two women smoked in the 1950s and 1960s, and there's an awful lot of 50- and 60-somethings around today to prove it wasn't fatal to their offspring.
JeanieG
says...
6:53pm Sat 1 Sep 12
JeanieG
says...
6:54pm Sat 1 Sep 12
JeanieG wrote:oops mean't saw not sw :(
I was in Town this morning and saw a young girl quite heavily pregnant smoking away. It still shocks me to see it, but then when I sw her purple hair I thought ah well poor baby don't stand a chance.
Davey Gravey
says...
7:22pm Sat 1 Sep 12
Hmmmf wrote:Guess you smoke? In the years you quote we didn't know the dangers of smoking
A spokesman for the NHS Information Centre said:
“Babies from deprived backgrounds are more likely to be born to mothers who smoke,
Babies don't have backgrounds. Especially when they haven't been born yet. And of what would any backgrounds they might later possess be deprived, exactly?
The numbers are clearly falling each time these reports are released, but the Adver still manages to spin that fact into bad news.
Jibberjab wrote:
I believe that smoking while pregnant should be against the law, and those found guilty should have there child benefit taken away.
Why? Almost one in two women smoked in the 1950s and 1960s, and there's an awful lot of 50- and 60-somethings around today to prove it wasn't fatal to their offspring.
Ringer
says...
10:38am Sun 2 Sep 12
A spokesman for the NHS Information Centre said:
“Babies from deprived backgrounds are more likely to be born to mothers who smoke"
As already picked up on, would this unnamed NHS spokesman care to tell us what and where these 'deprived backrounds' actually are?
The UK welfare state provides every pregant woman who needs it with their own home, money to spend plus additional money in the form of child benefit and further additional money in the form of healthy food vouchers. All of this money arrives in their bank accounts, like clockwork, every week or fortnightly. All healthcare, regardless of need and frequency, is provided to them.
It is impossible for a pregnant woman in this country in 2012 to be considered anything like 'deprived'.
PaulD
says...
1:31pm Sun 2 Sep 12
Why? Almost one in two women smoked in the 1950s and 1960s, and there's an awful lot of 50- and 60-somethings around today to prove it wasn't fatal to their offspring.
what a ridiculous argument. How many babies born to smokers in that period died young or suffered illnesses, deformities or other syndromes or conditions as a result of their mother's smoking?
This is like saying that wars aren't bad as there are usually some survivors afterwards
Hmmmf
says...
6:18pm Sun 2 Sep 12
Davey Gravey wrote:
Guess you smoke?
Nope. Guess again.
PaulD wrote:
what a ridiculous argument.
Not as ridiculous as "Jibberjab's Law. The point I was making is that smoking while pregnant is clearly not sufficiently nor demonstrably harmful to justify knee-jerk draconian laws which can neither be policed nor enforced, and which wouldn't survive five seconds in the European Courts. Perhaps, PaulD, you would care to answer your own rhetorical question and tell us all "How many babies born to smokers in that period died young or suffered illnesses, deformities or other syndromes or conditions as a result of their mother's smoking?" No? Thought not.
PaulD
says...
9:53am Mon 3 Sep 12
I wasn't the one bringing up facile arguments that fly in the face of accepted science and medicine
Here, let me help you out: http://www.lmgtfy.co
m/?q=smoking+pregnan
cy
dc the 2nd says...
9:34am Sat 1 Sep 12