West Swindon escapes plans for expansion

Richard Symonds is pleased at the protection afforded to West Swindon Richard Symonds is pleased at the protection afforded to West Swindon

West Swindon is not earmarked for any further expansion in the final draft of the local plan because Swindon Council says there is no more suitable space – and the infrastructure is inadequate even if there were.

The local plan 2026 will be the new overarching planning document, which will guide the decisions of the planning committee and officers, and sets out a number of general policies, as well as specific locations for residential and employment uses.

Across the borough, the document allocates space for 22,000 new homes and 77.5 hectares of new employment land, which the council says is necessary to maintain housing growth in line with economic and demographic forecasts, prevent unwanted development on greenfield land, and provide for business growth.

However, West Swindon, which has seen massive expansion since the 1980s, is hardly mentioned once in the document.

Coun Dale Heenan, cabinet member for strategic planning and sustainability, said: “The plan sets out how Swindon will grow over the next 15 years and there are no plans for the west of Swindon. By being robust and forward in our plans, we can support the local residents who do not wish to see development like Hook Street take place. “Development needs to take place somewhere in Swindon, but we don’t see how further development to the west is viable.

“No land is being allocated for the west of Swindon. And that’s something I hope that residents are pleased to hear and I know local councillors will be.”

This does not block developers from making a planning application on land not allocated for housing on either side of the Swindon-Wiltshire border. But the updated local plan will provide a stronger defence at a possible future planning inquiry.

It also cannot prevent the planned 700-home estate at Ridgeway Farm, close to Purton, on which the Government intends to announce a final decision on or before November 1.

In terms of improved infrastructure, the draft document protects the route of the Purton-Iffley relief road. Coun Heenan said: “We well know the importance of tackling traffic on Mead Way so we will continue supporting the Purton-Iffley road and protect its route. We just need to find the £100m for it.”

Resident Richard Symonds, of The Bramptons, Shaw, said he was pleased with the protection for West Swindon but was disappointed that Ridgeway Farm could not be protected.

“I’m relieved,” he said. “But I’m against any form of development anywhere that’s not supported by infrastructure to cope with the requirements of that community and the community it impacts upon.

“I don’t know where else they could build houses now. They have used every nook and corner now. The only one left is Hook Street up at Lydiard and I’m not convinced that’s gone away.”

Comments(13)

LordAshOfTheBrake says...
9:35pm Thu 18 Oct 12

That doesn't mean it won't happen though.

I seem to recall a few developments have been passed recently that were not part of the previous strategy!

Al Smith says...
9:50pm Thu 18 Oct 12

Considering West Swindon already touches the boundary with Wiltshire council what SBC wants means very little if Wiltshire council wants to build. Why would Wiltshire council spoil rural Wiltshire when they can spoil Swindon instead?

Which is lose-lose, we get more traffic, we don't get s.106 money and Wiltshire gets the additional council tax money.

The Artist formally known as Grumpy Old Man says...
9:30am Fri 19 Oct 12

So they won't build more in West Swindon because it doesn't have the infrastructure? Could someone please tell me where the infrastructure in east and north Swindon is to support another 45-50 thousand cars?!

Brunoh says...
10:31am Fri 19 Oct 12

Unfortunately the Borough Council has failed in its task as advocate for the people of Swindon.

In the grip of "forward planners", it remains a victim of the former SWRDA targets to place all development in an already overdeveloped Swindon.

We remain the ONLY PUA (Principal Urban Development area) in Wiltshire - the Borough should have pushed for alternative sites for this designation within Wiltshire ( a possible being a new town on salisbury plain/A303).

Now the prospect is for a steadily reducing quality of life as roads continue to gridlock, bus services fail to cope, the single Hospital fails to cope, there is little likelihood of an incinerator for waste disposal, villages are swamped with cheap and nasty houses, lowlying already existing areas flood due to increasing run off and dualling of sewers, the crematorium fails to cope, the leisure facilities age and crumble etc. etc.

We are no longer well placed in silicon valley, we no longer control land holding, the town is decaying from the centre, Honda may be going, we may be growing wind turbines in every surrounding greenfield - what a legacy!

RichardR1 says...
12:19pm Fri 19 Oct 12

A housing policy created by unelected Commissioners in the EU to accommodate the migrants they are now effectively paying to come to the UK, with travel grants and relocation expenses.

And what does our Government say, 'the grants etc are available to British workers wishing to relocate elsewhere in the EU'.

Hello the hundreds of thousands of migrants have headed to the UK because their countries are poor.

Even Angrier Monkey says...
1:10pm Fri 19 Oct 12

Interest in south marston? check
Anti EU ? check
Opinion on everything? check

But theres no way RichardR1 is Robert Feal Marinez

Still About says...
4:59pm Fri 19 Oct 12

Even Angrier Monkey wrote:
Interest in south marston? check
Anti EU ? check
Opinion on everything? check

But theres no way RichardR1 is Robert Feal Marinez
Not to mention

Continually bickering with I 2 Could B

Continually goadin Itsamess

Having a sound knowledge of age old conflicts

Being Hypercritical

Being an all round arrogant know all

I have complained to the Adver on numerous occasions and questioned why Mr Martinez is still allowed to spoil this forum

RichardR1 says...
5:54pm Fri 19 Oct 12

Perhaps because they realise you are wrong.

RichardR1 says...
5:56pm Fri 19 Oct 12

Oh and at the last survey 65% of the British population were anti EU, so far from alone, you know there are probably lots of people in Swindon who think wider than their front doors.

But I guess you trolls would claim they were all someone else. Such obsession is not healthy.

itsamess3 says...
10:23am Sat 20 Oct 12

RichardR1 wrote:
A housing policy created by unelected Commissioners in the EU to accommodate the migrants they are now effectively paying to come to the UK, with travel grants and relocation expenses.

And what does our Government say, 'the grants etc are available to British workers wishing to relocate elsewhere in the EU'.

Hello the hundreds of thousands of migrants have headed to the UK because their countries are poor.
Since when has our Council agreed plans at the behest of the EU?

NONE OF YOUR POSTS HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH THIS ARTICLE.

Our council consistently claims to build both housing and business space--which generally means more office blocks--despite numerous empty blocks in the town centre.
Trading estates half empty-mainly due to exhorbitant rates and rents.
Poor quality leisure areas and top bottom end venues.
Hardly surprising companies want to locate here.

RichardR1 says...
12:19pm Sat 20 Oct 12

Mr Itsamess3 as an acclaimed, albeit self acclaimed, International Scientist, you should know that no country is an island in World or European affairs.

The Government are told by the EU the housing expectation for the UK, the Government in turn pass it on down the line to the Regions and on down to LA's.

Very much about why we really do not need 22,000 for Swindon's domestic use.

Pompey-Bound says...
1:32pm Sat 20 Oct 12

Still About wrote:
Even Angrier Monkey wrote:
Interest in south marston? check
Anti EU ? check
Opinion on everything? check

But theres no way RichardR1 is Robert Feal Marinez
Not to mention

Continually bickering with I 2 Could B

Continually goadin Itsamess

Having a sound knowledge of age old conflicts

Being Hypercritical

Being an all round arrogant know all

I have complained to the Adver on numerous occasions and questioned why Mr Martinez is still allowed to spoil this forum
Look on the bright side chaps, his behaviour on these pages has cost him his lease at the Carps. He has had to leave town, South Marston will be better for it!

RichardR1 says...
10:00am Sun 21 Oct 12

I don't think Arkell's do leases. I also do not think he has left town either.

Perhaps you should pop into the pub and find out the truth. But that would spoil your trolling wouldn't it.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree