- Mobile site
- E-Newsletters
-
- News feed
- Find us on Twitter
@swindonadver
All the latest news and views from the Swindon Advertiser
@stfcadver
All the latest sport from the Swindon Advertiser
@WiltsBusiness
Official Twitter feed from the Wiltshire Business Magazine
@SamMorshead_SA
STFC and chief sports writer Sam Morshead
@gazzaloz
Editor Gary Lawrence
@AdverPicDesk
Picture Desk
@SwindonAdver007
Katie Bond, news editor
@StephTye
Stephanie Tye, web editor
@Matt_r_Edwards
Matthew Edwards, reporter
@DArcysj
Scott D'Arcy, crime reporter
@nedpayne1
Ned Payne, sports writer
@AndyWarren_
Andy Warren, sports writer
- Find us on Facebook
Swindon Advertiser
Like us on Facebook
SWINDON TOWN: Town to look into safe standing at the County Ground (From Swindon Advertiser)
Get involved! Send photos, video, news & views. Text SWINDON NEWS to 80360 or email us
SWINDON TOWN: Town to look into safe standing at the County Ground
6:00am Saturday 12th January 2013 in Sport By Sam Morshead
Safe standing could return to the County Ground
SWINDON Town have backed the Football Supporters’ Federation’s ‘Safe Standing’ campaign after being presented with figures generated by a local fans’ website which suggested 87 per cent of Robins supporters would welcome the initiative.
The FSF notion is to trial “rail seating” at stadiums across the country, paving the way for a possible return of modern terracing at football grounds in England.
Peterborough and Aston Villa have already agreed to test out the concept and, while Swindon will not go that far, after looking over the results of a poll conducted by TheWashbag.com and sending a representative to a parliamentary showcase entitled ‘The Case for Safe Standing in Football’ last month, the Robins have thrown their support behind the campaign.
A statement from the club read: “Swindon Town is a club that prides itself on listening to its fans and when surveys such as the recent one run by fan website The Washbag.com indicate that 87 per cent of Town supporters would welcome the introduction of a safe standing area as part of redevelopment of the County Ground, we are naturally only too happy to have that debate and explore whether that is something that may be possible in the years ahead.
“We believe that such (safe standing) trials would be useful for the football community as a whole in order to enable all concerned to take fully informed, evidence-based decisions on the possible wider introduction of such areas in the future. Swindon Town Football Club fully supports Villa and Peterborough in their request to be allowed to run such trials.”
Ron Smith, editor of TheWashbag.com said: “With such a strong display of public support we were pleased with Swindon Town's response and held a constructive meeting with (operations manager)Mark Isaacs. Clearly the club have listened to their supporters in making this statement in support of Aston Villa and Peterborough United being allowed to undertake the safe standing trials.
“These will provide a vital tool to further test the already strong case for safe standing areas in the Premier League and Football League. TheWashbag.com welcomes the opportunity of working with the club and supporters' groups to see safe standing become a reality at the County Ground.”
Comments(16)
smirg kcab
says...
6:48am Sat 12 Jan 13
Onwards and upwards
Oh it's good to be beside the sea side
batch
says...
7:34am Sat 12 Jan 13
SAPFanSTFC
says...
8:32am Sat 12 Jan 13
swindon69 wrote:As 70% of the ground would still be all seater there will be far and away enough room to sit - this will provide the option for those who want to stand and accept the old trials and tribulations.
Standing at a football ground was only good when, like penguins, the fans used to huddle together to keep warm. It's a retrograde step, in my opinion, and is only good for those persons of a certain height; shorter people, children and the disabled would all have their view disrupted due to taller people getting in the way. The Town End as it is may as well be a terrace, because, if you buy a seat ticket in there, you can never use the seat as everyone stands anyway.
...
The new safe standing gives far more room to each spectator as well so you'd probably find that only the shortest and smallest would still be impacted and if they can't get somewhere with good visibility then the main stands are probably the best place for them anyway.....after all the Town End does not, and never did, give the best view of the game....but it has always been the best atmosphere! If it did go back to standing I'd certainly go back every now and then for the memories.
...
Always remember standing near the back but always squinting wondering if the ball was on the 18yd line, 6yd line or in the net......never stopped us appealing for favourable offsides or berating the referee for stupid offside decisions on us...regardless of what we could actually see. :-)
HOOKEY
says...
9:19am Sat 12 Jan 13
London Red
says...
9:27am Sat 12 Jan 13
.
I've alway thought a ring about the size of the front part of the DR should be standing with seats above it
.
That then allows the choice all the way around the ground
.
Dortmund have one 15k standing stand and don't have any issues - I'm sure a few thousand in each stand wouldn't be an issue - especially if controlled properly which was the actual real reason for the disaster
DarrenSTFCRomain
says...
10:15am Sat 12 Jan 13
SAPFanSTFC wrote:I ALWAYS go in the TownEnd but always get a seat were the fans chose to stand and sing...
swindon69 wrote: Standing at a football ground was only good when, like penguins, the fans used to huddle together to keep warm. It's a retrograde step, in my opinion, and is only good for those persons of a certain height; shorter people, children and the disabled would all have their view disrupted due to taller people getting in the way. The Town End as it is may as well be a terrace, because, if you buy a seat ticket in there, you can never use the seat as everyone stands anyway.As 70% of the ground would still be all seater there will be far and away enough room to sit - this will provide the option for those who want to stand and accept the old trials and tribulations. ... The new safe standing gives far more room to each spectator as well so you'd probably find that only the shortest and smallest would still be impacted and if they can't get somewhere with good visibility then the main stands are probably the best place for them anyway.....after all the Town End does not, and never did, give the best view of the game....but it has always been the best atmosphere! If it did go back to standing I'd certainly go back every now and then for the memories. ... Always remember standing near the back but always squinting wondering if the ball was on the 18yd line, 6yd line or in the net......never stopped us appealing for favourable offsides or berating the referee for stupid offside decisions on us...regardless of what we could actually see. :-)
Its called having a option and being told to sit down when im shouting me head off and suporting are team gets right on my t1ts....
1 disaster and everyone has to pay for it..
Last step
says...
12:02pm Sat 12 Jan 13
Some really good posts on this thread so far too.
If you've not had a look at the safe standing area on the Football Supporters Federation website then please do so now. There's a petition & a link to contact your MP about it.
Oi Den!
says...
1:15pm Sat 12 Jan 13
London Red wrote:Good post LR. Of course we used to have exactly what you suggest on both sides of the ground. On the north side, before the present stand was built, we had "The enclosure" standing area in front of the seats. For sell-out games there were also "ringside seats" on the track around the pitch - old railway station benches I think. Brilliant - although I'm sure Elf n Safety would never allow that to happen again.
Given the choice at away games I always choose standing and so it appears do most fans as when I've sat with the old man it's not been busy like the standing parts . I've alway thought a ring about the size of the front part of the DR should be standing with seats above it . That then allows the choice all the way around the ground . Dortmund have one 15k standing stand and don't have any issues - I'm sure a few thousand in each stand wouldn't be an issue - especially if controlled properly which was the actual real reason for the disaster
sp1dersw3b
says...
1:43am Sun 13 Jan 13
DarrenSTFCRomain wrote:1 disaster and everyone has to pay for it...............thi
SAPFanSTFC wrote:I ALWAYS go in the TownEnd but always get a seat were the fans chose to stand and sing...
swindon69 wrote: Standing at a football ground was only good when, like penguins, the fans used to huddle together to keep warm. It's a retrograde step, in my opinion, and is only good for those persons of a certain height; shorter people, children and the disabled would all have their view disrupted due to taller people getting in the way. The Town End as it is may as well be a terrace, because, if you buy a seat ticket in there, you can never use the seat as everyone stands anyway.As 70% of the ground would still be all seater there will be far and away enough room to sit - this will provide the option for those who want to stand and accept the old trials and tribulations. ... The new safe standing gives far more room to each spectator as well so you'd probably find that only the shortest and smallest would still be impacted and if they can't get somewhere with good visibility then the main stands are probably the best place for them anyway.....after all the Town End does not, and never did, give the best view of the game....but it has always been the best atmosphere! If it did go back to standing I'd certainly go back every now and then for the memories. ... Always remember standing near the back but always squinting wondering if the ball was on the 18yd line, 6yd line or in the net......never stopped us appealing for favourable offsides or berating the referee for stupid offside decisions on us...regardless of what we could actually see. :-)
Its called having a option and being told to sit down when im shouting me head off and suporting are team gets right on my t1ts....
1 disaster and everyone has to pay for it..
s is a shameful, ignorant and IMO only disrespectful comment to the relatives and friends of the 96.
Unless of course you are referring to another disaster, but if you are, then that would be two wouldn't it.
Limited safe standing for those that crave this is probably a retrospective step but it might be easier to police and steward the idiot fans that sometimes trouble our great game so from that point of view, I'm OK with it..
smirg kcab
says...
1:28pm Sun 13 Jan 13
sp1dersw3b wrote:I take it you did not see the report from hillsbourgh?
DarrenSTFCRomain wrote:1 disaster and everyone has to pay for it...............thi
SAPFanSTFC wrote:I ALWAYS go in the TownEnd but always get a seat were the fans chose to stand and sing...
swindon69 wrote: Standing at a football ground was only good when, like penguins, the fans used to huddle together to keep warm. It's a retrograde step, in my opinion, and is only good for those persons of a certain height; shorter people, children and the disabled would all have their view disrupted due to taller people getting in the way. The Town End as it is may as well be a terrace, because, if you buy a seat ticket in there, you can never use the seat as everyone stands anyway.As 70% of the ground would still be all seater there will be far and away enough room to sit - this will provide the option for those who want to stand and accept the old trials and tribulations. ... The new safe standing gives far more room to each spectator as well so you'd probably find that only the shortest and smallest would still be impacted and if they can't get somewhere with good visibility then the main stands are probably the best place for them anyway.....after all the Town End does not, and never did, give the best view of the game....but it has always been the best atmosphere! If it did go back to standing I'd certainly go back every now and then for the memories. ... Always remember standing near the back but always squinting wondering if the ball was on the 18yd line, 6yd line or in the net......never stopped us appealing for favourable offsides or berating the referee for stupid offside decisions on us...regardless of what we could actually see. :-)
Its called having a option and being told to sit down when im shouting me head off and suporting are team gets right on my t1ts....
1 disaster and everyone has to pay for it..
s is a shameful, ignorant and IMO only disrespectful comment to the relatives and friends of the 96.
Unless of course you are referring to another disaster, but if you are, then that would be two wouldn't it.
Limited safe standing for those that crave this is probably a retrospective step but it might be easier to police and steward the idiot fans that sometimes trouble our great game so from that point of view, I'm OK with it..
Your the ignorant twaat
They died throught bad policing nothing to do with safe standing. It should have been safe but I'm affraid them idiots made it unsafe standing.
FACT and now proved.
Onwards and upwards
Last step
says...
5:08pm Sun 13 Jan 13
The shameful and ignorant ones are those who refer to Hillsborough (a true disaster) whenever safe standing is mentioned.
Onwards and (stand) up.
Last step
says...
5:08pm Sun 13 Jan 13
sp1dersw3b
says...
9:48am Mon 14 Jan 13
smirg kcab wrote:LOL - should expected such a reply and I suppose therefore not disappointed.
sp1dersw3b wrote:I take it you did not see the report from hillsbourgh?
DarrenSTFCRomain wrote:1 disaster and everyone has to pay for it...............thi
SAPFanSTFC wrote:I ALWAYS go in the TownEnd but always get a seat were the fans chose to stand and sing...
swindon69 wrote: Standing at a football ground was only good when, like penguins, the fans used to huddle together to keep warm. It's a retrograde step, in my opinion, and is only good for those persons of a certain height; shorter people, children and the disabled would all have their view disrupted due to taller people getting in the way. The Town End as it is may as well be a terrace, because, if you buy a seat ticket in there, you can never use the seat as everyone stands anyway.As 70% of the ground would still be all seater there will be far and away enough room to sit - this will provide the option for those who want to stand and accept the old trials and tribulations. ... The new safe standing gives far more room to each spectator as well so you'd probably find that only the shortest and smallest would still be impacted and if they can't get somewhere with good visibility then the main stands are probably the best place for them anyway.....after all the Town End does not, and never did, give the best view of the game....but it has always been the best atmosphere! If it did go back to standing I'd certainly go back every now and then for the memories. ... Always remember standing near the back but always squinting wondering if the ball was on the 18yd line, 6yd line or in the net......never stopped us appealing for favourable offsides or berating the referee for stupid offside decisions on us...regardless of what we could actually see. :-)
Its called having a option and being told to sit down when im shouting me head off and suporting are team gets right on my t1ts....
1 disaster and everyone has to pay for it..
s is a shameful, ignorant and IMO only disrespectful comment to the relatives and friends of the 96.
Unless of course you are referring to another disaster, but if you are, then that would be two wouldn't it.
Limited safe standing for those that crave this is probably a retrospective step but it might be easier to police and steward the idiot fans that sometimes trouble our great game so from that point of view, I'm OK with it..
Your the ignorant twaat
They died throught bad policing nothing to do with safe standing. It should have been safe but I'm affraid them idiots made it unsafe standing.
FACT and now proved.
Onwards and upwards
Of course I have read (most of) the Taylor report - my comment was aimed at the reference to a 'disaster' and that then we 'we' all suffer. You do me a total injustice by suggesting my ignorance when you have jumped in with both feet without fully understanding the thrust of IMO only point.
The comment was in bad taste - FACT - end of!
Last step
says...
6:26pm Mon 14 Jan 13
melnursesear.
says...
8:49pm Mon 14 Jan 13
s do not compare with standing anywhere..just a thought.

swindon69 says...
6:12am Sat 12 Jan 13