THE SAYING goes ‘if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it’ and you’d have to say that we probably have one of the best football pyramids in the world – but I’m not against change.

If the changes to the structure of the Football League that have been suggested are going to benefit everybody, then that’s great but at the moment, I’d like the authorities to show that they will and say exactly how they’re going to do it.

After Thursday’s announcement, there isn’t anything that has really made me say ‘wow’ yet.

If there’s going to four divisions of 20 teams, that means everybody loses three home games, and the revenue that they get from that. I know that they do want to make Saturday more of an institution and cut down on midweek games.

At the moment, I can’t really see how if benefits the clubs at the bottom end of the spectrum but it would, of course, benefit sides from the National League because we could have a whole host of them promoted into the new league.

You’d have to bring in a host of new clubs and I’m sure that Rangers and Celtic would be interested in coming down because of the money there is in English football, but where are the rest going to come from?

There’s always a hidden agenda. Of course it’s not been mentioned because of the reaction when it was previously talked about but there could be a number of Premier League nursery sides or ‘B’ teams involved.

One thing I’d like to see is if it was the Championship, League One, and then League Two North and South.

If you regionalised things, you’d get bigger crowds because you’d have so many more local derbies and you’d also cut down on travel costs for those smaller teams.

For me, Hartlepool v Plymouth doesn’t make sense, especially as a midweek fixture, but it’s not something that’s really been mentioned yet.