I WAS initially surprised to read the comments from Chris Humphreys (Adver, August 8), concerning the Regent Circus shared crossing.

Having given the letter further consideration, I came to the conclusion it must be a tongue-in-cheek observation which uses irony to illustrate how our urban designers have failed to create a user inclusive crossing.

There are many organisations which try to ensure disabled people have more control over their lives.

They fight for their rights to be listened to, recognised and supported and for them to have the opportunity to develop confidence, skills and abilities.

To assist with these aims it is essential that communities support their needs, improve accessibility and listen to what people want.

The Disability Discrimination Act 2005 exists to ensure disabled people are treated fairly at work, in places such as shops, banks, restaurants, public houses, on public transport, by local authorities, schools, hospitals and so on.

The Equality Act 2010 has a section on direct discrimination which refers to someone being treated differently because of their disability.

It seems strange that there are so many public locations which are covered by anti-discriminatory laws while areas within the public urban environment appear to be exempt.

Chris Humphreys suggests that blind or visually-impaired people should approach able-bodied people to ask if they be would kind enough to assist them across the Regent Circus shared crossing.

I suggest that for someone who is intent on maintaining their independence this solution to a serious problem is likely to be seen as offensive, patronising and discriminatory.

Are Swindon's urban designers really oblivious to the fact that we are living in a high-tech 21st century country?

Are they not capable of providing a safe and sensible solution to a discriminatory problem which they created?

It seems to me that more consideration should be given to people, within our community, who have special needs.

MR K KANE Wharf Road, Wroughton