Elections have cost us £14,000

Swindon Advertiser: Richard Hailstone Richard Hailstone

HAYDON Wick Parish Council is looking to stem the number of by-elections after it has been forced to fork out more than £14,000 over the last five weeks.

If 10 residents demand an election to be held the council is duty bound to hold it, but the costs of administering them are proving crippling to the council’s budget.

Over the past five weeks, three elections have been called for replacement parish councillors, coming to a potential cost of around £21,000.

To try to reduce costs, the council decided not to provide postal votes, saving around £3,000.

Following the resignation of Coun Eddie Bedwell, an election was called for September 19.

But in the event only 441 people turned out to vote, coming to just 6 per cent of eligible voters.

A subsequent election on November 14 returned an improved vote of 7.78 per cent, when Coun Julie Martin was elected.

And considering the low turnout experienced in by-elections, councillors are now questioning the necessity of spending money on their administration.

Chairman Richard Hailstone, said: “We have had a number of councillors resign during the past three or four months. The normal way of dealing with this is for the council to co-opt people in.

“Unfortunately over the past few weeks that system has really broken down. It is quite an unusual occurrence for 10 people to demand an election, but that is what we have had to deal with.

“What we are saying is the procedure is there but it is rarely used. The implication being the parish council is being used as a political battle ground.

“There are no objections to the democratic process being used. We are just asking if it is proportionate to spend this sort of money on a limited budget, as it means resources are being taken away from other areas. A polling station at Bridlewood School in a recent election was manned from 7am to 10pm in a recent election but not one person came to vote.

“We will be trying to lobby through our national association for the rules to be relaxed. If this continues it will be crippling to our finances.

“The amount spent on these recent elections is equivalent to half the recreation committed budget for the year, so it is a considerable sum of money we are losing.”

Coun John Stooke, communications chair, added: “We all feel this is a scandalous waste of charge payer's funds, and that local residents should be made aware of these costs when they call for by-elections.

“Any individual who procures a by-election rather than the traditional co-option route should have more regard to such wanton waste and behave more reasonably.”

Comments (8)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

8:24am Thu 5 Dec 13

A.Baron-Cohen says...

The councillor that leaves his/her post should be made to pay for the cost of the new election.
The councillor that leaves his/her post should be made to pay for the cost of the new election. A.Baron-Cohen

8:53am Thu 5 Dec 13

dc the 2nd says...

well clearly you have no engagement from your parishioners but do have a bunch of old duffers arguing over who should be in charge, ask yourselves if this is a parish council problem or a haydon wick parish council problem.
well clearly you have no engagement from your parishioners but do have a bunch of old duffers arguing over who should be in charge, ask yourselves if this is a parish council problem or a haydon wick parish council problem. dc the 2nd

9:53am Thu 5 Dec 13

RichardR1 says...

dc I would say it is the latter in your question rarely do Parish Councils have by-elections, co-option is the norm.
dc I would say it is the latter in your question rarely do Parish Councils have by-elections, co-option is the norm. RichardR1

1:28pm Thu 5 Dec 13

house on the hill says...

A.Baron-Cohen wrote:
The councillor that leaves his/her post should be made to pay for the cost of the new election.
So when they die it comes out of their estate? Really stupid comment. Presumably everyone who quits their job should pay for the cost of replacing them too?
[quote][p][bold]A.Baron-Cohen[/bold] wrote: The councillor that leaves his/her post should be made to pay for the cost of the new election.[/p][/quote]So when they die it comes out of their estate? Really stupid comment. Presumably everyone who quits their job should pay for the cost of replacing them too? house on the hill

4:54pm Thu 5 Dec 13

A.Baron-Cohen says...

house on the hill wrote:
A.Baron-Cohen wrote:
The councillor that leaves his/her post should be made to pay for the cost of the new election.
So when they die it comes out of their estate? Really stupid comment. Presumably everyone who quits their job should pay for the cost of replacing them too?
another silly comment from HotH......
[quote][p][bold]house on the hill[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]A.Baron-Cohen[/bold] wrote: The councillor that leaves his/her post should be made to pay for the cost of the new election.[/p][/quote]So when they die it comes out of their estate? Really stupid comment. Presumably everyone who quits their job should pay for the cost of replacing them too?[/p][/quote]another silly comment from HotH...... A.Baron-Cohen

6:25pm Thu 5 Dec 13

Fox in Exile says...

Perhaps the people or the party that back them should be made to pay for these elections.
Perhaps the people or the party that back them should be made to pay for these elections. Fox in Exile

7:01pm Thu 5 Dec 13

Morsey says...

Turn out is low because of poor notification, I'm afraid to say! No polling card received.
Turn out is low because of poor notification, I'm afraid to say! No polling card received. Morsey

7:53am Fri 6 Dec 13

house on the hill says...

A.Baron-Cohen wrote:
house on the hill wrote:
A.Baron-Cohen wrote:
The councillor that leaves his/her post should be made to pay for the cost of the new election.
So when they die it comes out of their estate? Really stupid comment. Presumably everyone who quits their job should pay for the cost of replacing them too?
another silly comment from HotH......
You really are an idiot. you really believe outgoing councillors should pay to replace them? Why? its a public office and how would you make them pay? you don't think that would just attract the wealthy then? I have had springer spaniels with more intelligence and common sense than you. I have no idea who you are or where you come from, but clearly the education system needs a complete overhall. so many of your comments are just unworkable and stupid in the extreme. Please engage brain before you deploy fingers or better still just go away!
[quote][p][bold]A.Baron-Cohen[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]house on the hill[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]A.Baron-Cohen[/bold] wrote: The councillor that leaves his/her post should be made to pay for the cost of the new election.[/p][/quote]So when they die it comes out of their estate? Really stupid comment. Presumably everyone who quits their job should pay for the cost of replacing them too?[/p][/quote]another silly comment from HotH......[/p][/quote]You really are an idiot. you really believe outgoing councillors should pay to replace them? Why? its a public office and how would you make them pay? you don't think that would just attract the wealthy then? I have had springer spaniels with more intelligence and common sense than you. I have no idea who you are or where you come from, but clearly the education system needs a complete overhall. so many of your comments are just unworkable and stupid in the extreme. Please engage brain before you deploy fingers or better still just go away! house on the hill

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree