Swindon AdvertiserTown stars in BBC Question Time (From Swindon Advertiser)

Get involved! Send photos, video, news & views. Text SWINDON NEWS to 80360 or email us

Town stars in BBC Question Time

Swindon Advertiser: Town stars in BBC Question Time Town stars in BBC Question Time

SOME of Swindon’s sharpest minds got to put politicians on the rack during the town’s first-ever appearance on BBC Question Time.

The BBC One current affairs programme, hosted by David Dimbleby, was recorded at New College in Walcot around an hour it was broadcast on the flagship channel at 10.35pm on Thursday (20feb).

The panel included Defence Secretary Philip Hammond, Shadow Health Minister Liz Kendall, former leader of the Liberal Democrats Charles Kennedy, author Jeanette Winterson and philosopher Roger Scruton.

Charles Kennedy, who was the first to answer a question form the audience, was pleased to be able to take part in Thursday’s episode.

He said: “I have been to Swindon a number of times over the years but it is the first time I’ve been back in a few years.

“I am very impressed with this facility at New College and I hope the production company have taken note, since it is the first time it has come to Swindon.

“The audience is half of what makes the programme and it was a brilliant vibrant audience, so hopefully people will enjoy it.”

The panelists were put to the test by audience members on a range of issues, including benefit fraud, the increased use of foodbanks, whether we should use Chinese methods to teach our children maths and whether ‘yobbery’ in Prime Minister’s Questions is acceptable.

Phil Webb, of Waverley Road, was one of the audience members who had an opportunity to ask a question.

He said: “It’s something which I said that if it ever came to Swindon then I would try to go on.

“It was great, there were lots of different topics discussed.

“I asked about building on flood plains. Tadpole Lane, Blunsdon and Wanborough are all flood plains but they are building on them.”

Albertine Davies, from Eldene, was one of those fortunate enough to get a spot in the audience.
The 34-yeaer-old said: “It was brilliant fun.

“There was a really convivial atmosphere.

“David Dimbleby spoke to us beforehand to tell us how it was going to go and we got to ask him questions like, ‘have you ever had to throw someone out’.

“I watch it occasionally at home and like when you watch a live show it was better to see it live. Rather than sitting at home shouting at the television it was good to be able to be there.”

It is the first time the programme has recorded from Swindon, and New College were thrilled to be able to host it.

New College Principal, Graham Taylor, said: “This is the first time Question Time has been to Swindon and we are delighted that they have chosen New College and our Phoenix Theatre as the venue.

“The BBC kindly allowed our Media Make-up and Media Studies students to shadow the programme and help the panellists.

“The Question Time format is a great learning tool for our Debating Society students and students taking Government & Politics, General Studies, Critical Thinking – in fact the humanities in general, which all involve debate, understanding and appreciating different viewpoints and aiming to construct and present arguments based on facts not prejudices.”

People who missed the show can still watch it by visiting www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b03w4b0d/Question_Time_20_02_2014.

Comments (41)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

10:14am Fri 21 Feb 14

RichardR1 says...

‘have you ever had to throw someone out’ wow that made Swindon looked good.
‘have you ever had to throw someone out’ wow that made Swindon looked good. RichardR1
  • Score: -1

10:31am Fri 21 Feb 14

stratton man says...

I watched it.Waste of an hour it bored the ar*e off me.
I watched it.Waste of an hour it bored the ar*e off me. stratton man
  • Score: 5

10:39am Fri 21 Feb 14

RichardR1 says...

I'm watching it now, and what a surprise, the biggest cheers are for those advocating the welfare system.
I'm watching it now, and what a surprise, the biggest cheers are for those advocating the welfare system. RichardR1
  • Score: -11

11:00am Fri 21 Feb 14

Wildwestener says...

RichardR1 wrote:
I'm watching it now, and what a surprise, the biggest cheers are for those advocating the welfare system.
Are people not entitled to an opinion then? Are we in North Korea all of a sudden. Just because people disagree with you does not make them somehow unreasonable. Get over yourself.
[quote][p][bold]RichardR1[/bold] wrote: I'm watching it now, and what a surprise, the biggest cheers are for those advocating the welfare system.[/p][/quote]Are people not entitled to an opinion then? Are we in North Korea all of a sudden. Just because people disagree with you does not make them somehow unreasonable. Get over yourself. Wildwestener
  • Score: 6

11:26am Fri 21 Feb 14

swindondad says...

Wildwestener wrote:
RichardR1 wrote: I'm watching it now, and what a surprise, the biggest cheers are for those advocating the welfare system.
Are people not entitled to an opinion then? Are we in North Korea all of a sudden. Just because people disagree with you does not make them somehow unreasonable. Get over yourself.
Everyone is entitled to voice their opinion but as per the discussion when this program was announced with an audience invited by the production company and only the questions they had pre selected being asked there is always the risk of bias.
[quote][p][bold]Wildwestener[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]RichardR1[/bold] wrote: I'm watching it now, and what a surprise, the biggest cheers are for those advocating the welfare system.[/p][/quote]Are people not entitled to an opinion then? Are we in North Korea all of a sudden. Just because people disagree with you does not make them somehow unreasonable. Get over yourself.[/p][/quote]Everyone is entitled to voice their opinion but as per the discussion when this program was announced with an audience invited by the production company and only the questions they had pre selected being asked there is always the risk of bias. swindondad
  • Score: 11

11:41am Fri 21 Feb 14

RichardR1 says...

Some seem overly sensitive. Merely stating my opinion. I did say I thought there would be left bias and so there was. The left certainly had a champion in the form of our resident author.

Sadly she couldn't see how she was showing herself up by her rants, IMHO.
Some seem overly sensitive. Merely stating my opinion. I did say I thought there would be left bias and so there was. The left certainly had a champion in the form of our resident author. Sadly she couldn't see how she was showing herself up by her rants, IMHO. RichardR1
  • Score: 4

11:45am Fri 21 Feb 14

ChannelX says...

It was all absolutely par for the course, lots of lefties saying, 'Yes, of course that needs to be changed... but let's definitely not change it'.

Plenty of day-dream ideas backed up with absolutely no mention of how such things could ever be made to work in reality.

It's as if some people think there's limitless money to be handed out for everything but there are a few Scrooge-like people deliberately making sure it's kept in their bank vault.

Never ceases to amaze me how anti-Capitalist Socialists are the ones who seem to believe most vehemently that more of other people's money is the cure for everything.
It was all absolutely par for the course, lots of lefties saying, 'Yes, of course that needs to be changed... but let's definitely not change it'. Plenty of day-dream ideas backed up with absolutely no mention of how such things could ever be made to work in reality. It's as if some people think there's limitless money to be handed out for everything but there are a few Scrooge-like people deliberately making sure it's kept in their bank vault. Never ceases to amaze me how anti-Capitalist Socialists are the ones who seem to believe most vehemently that more of other people's money is the cure for everything. ChannelX
  • Score: -1

12:02pm Fri 21 Feb 14

Big Time says...

ChannelX wrote:
It was all absolutely par for the course, lots of lefties saying, 'Yes, of course that needs to be changed... but let's definitely not change it'.

Plenty of day-dream ideas backed up with absolutely no mention of how such things could ever be made to work in reality.

It's as if some people think there's limitless money to be handed out for everything but there are a few Scrooge-like people deliberately making sure it's kept in their bank vault.

Never ceases to amaze me how anti-Capitalist Socialists are the ones who seem to believe most vehemently that more of other people's money is the cure for everything.
Get a life!
[quote][p][bold]ChannelX[/bold] wrote: It was all absolutely par for the course, lots of lefties saying, 'Yes, of course that needs to be changed... but let's definitely not change it'. Plenty of day-dream ideas backed up with absolutely no mention of how such things could ever be made to work in reality. It's as if some people think there's limitless money to be handed out for everything but there are a few Scrooge-like people deliberately making sure it's kept in their bank vault. Never ceases to amaze me how anti-Capitalist Socialists are the ones who seem to believe most vehemently that more of other people's money is the cure for everything.[/p][/quote]Get a life! Big Time
  • Score: -5

12:06pm Fri 21 Feb 14

trolley dolley says...

ChannelX is spot on.

I watched the program and got the impression apart from being boring it achieved nothing.

Just a few people reading questions to other people who almost appeared to read the answers.
ChannelX is spot on. I watched the program and got the impression apart from being boring it achieved nothing. Just a few people reading questions to other people who almost appeared to read the answers. trolley dolley
  • Score: -11

12:15pm Fri 21 Feb 14

Big Time says...

trolley dolley & ChannelX = same person, very sad individual
trolley dolley & ChannelX = same person, very sad individual Big Time
  • Score: 10

12:40pm Fri 21 Feb 14

trolley dolley says...

Big Time says

trolley dolley & ChannelX = same person, very sad individual

WRONG, please try again.
Big Time says trolley dolley & ChannelX = same person, very sad individual WRONG, please try again. trolley dolley
  • Score: -11

12:42pm Fri 21 Feb 14

The Zax says...

Big Time wrote:
ChannelX wrote:
It was all absolutely par for the course, lots of lefties saying, 'Yes, of course that needs to be changed... but let's definitely not change it'.

Plenty of day-dream ideas backed up with absolutely no mention of how such things could ever be made to work in reality.

It's as if some people think there's limitless money to be handed out for everything but there are a few Scrooge-like people deliberately making sure it's kept in their bank vault.

Never ceases to amaze me how anti-Capitalist Socialists are the ones who seem to believe most vehemently that more of other people's money is the cure for everything.
Get a life!
"Getting" a life risks implying self-reliance. Perhaps you mean "Request that you be supplied with a life at the public expense".
[quote][p][bold]Big Time[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]ChannelX[/bold] wrote: It was all absolutely par for the course, lots of lefties saying, 'Yes, of course that needs to be changed... but let's definitely not change it'. Plenty of day-dream ideas backed up with absolutely no mention of how such things could ever be made to work in reality. It's as if some people think there's limitless money to be handed out for everything but there are a few Scrooge-like people deliberately making sure it's kept in their bank vault. Never ceases to amaze me how anti-Capitalist Socialists are the ones who seem to believe most vehemently that more of other people's money is the cure for everything.[/p][/quote]Get a life![/p][/quote]"Getting" a life risks implying self-reliance. Perhaps you mean "Request that you be supplied with a life at the public expense". The Zax
  • Score: -8

12:42pm Fri 21 Feb 14

ChаnnelX says...

Big Time wrote:
trolley dolley & ChannelX = same person, very sad individual
Typical paranoid lefty, very sad individual.
[quote][p][bold]Big Time[/bold] wrote: trolley dolley & ChannelX = same person, very sad individual[/p][/quote]Typical paranoid lefty, very sad individual. ChаnnelX
  • Score: -20

12:55pm Fri 21 Feb 14

1 2 Could B says...

Big Time is correct
Big Time is correct 1 2 Could B
  • Score: 14

1:24pm Fri 21 Feb 14

Big Time says...

ChаnnelX wrote:
Big Time wrote:
trolley dolley & ChannelX = same person, very sad individual
Typical paranoid lefty, very sad individual.
anyone in any doubt just look back over trolley dolley & ChannelX comments and the style and content used in both, and this will confirm they are the same poster.

You have been exposed so now stop digging and take the shame, maybe you should get off of your **** and get a life away from adver comment section, weirdo.
[quote][p][bold]ChаnnelX[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Big Time[/bold] wrote: trolley dolley & ChannelX = same person, very sad individual[/p][/quote]Typical paranoid lefty, very sad individual.[/p][/quote]anyone in any doubt just look back over trolley dolley & ChannelX comments and the style and content used in both, and this will confirm they are the same poster. You have been exposed so now stop digging and take the shame, maybe you should get off of your **** and get a life away from adver comment section, weirdo. Big Time
  • Score: 14

1:57pm Fri 21 Feb 14

Hmmmf says...

Big Time/bold] wrote:
get a life away from adver comment section

And you see no irony at all in posting that in the adver comment section?
[quote][p][bold]Big Time/bold] wrote: get a life away from adver comment section[/quote] And you see no irony at all in posting that in the adver comment section? Hmmmf
  • Score: -8

1:57pm Fri 21 Feb 14

ChannelX says...

1 2 Could B wrote:
Big Time is correct
Using your level of 'logic', both you and Big Time are the same person.

Same paranoia, same error, same stupidity.

So, you're one and the same - yes?
[quote][p][bold]1 2 Could B[/bold] wrote: Big Time is correct[/p][/quote]Using your level of 'logic', both you and Big Time are the same person. Same paranoia, same error, same stupidity. So, you're one and the same - yes? ChannelX
  • Score: -14

2:00pm Fri 21 Feb 14

ChannelX says...

Big Time wrote:
ChаnnelX wrote:
Big Time wrote:
trolley dolley & ChannelX = same person, very sad individual
Typical paranoid lefty, very sad individual.
anyone in any doubt just look back over trolley dolley & ChannelX comments and the style and content used in both, and this will confirm they are the same poster.

You have been exposed so now stop digging and take the shame, maybe you should get off of your **** and get a life away from adver comment section, weirdo.
'Exposed'?

No, all that is happened is that you've got something spectacularly wrong and very publically.

Well done.

You can't simply make a (false) allegation and then waltz off as though you've somehow unearthed some fantastic revelation.

Anyone who reads the site regularly will know full well that Trolley Dolly is not the same person as me.

I know how much you left-wingers find it difficult to believe that anyone, let alone two or more people, could possibly not share your retarded mindset, but it does actually tend to happen.
[quote][p][bold]Big Time[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]ChаnnelX[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Big Time[/bold] wrote: trolley dolley & ChannelX = same person, very sad individual[/p][/quote]Typical paranoid lefty, very sad individual.[/p][/quote]anyone in any doubt just look back over trolley dolley & ChannelX comments and the style and content used in both, and this will confirm they are the same poster. You have been exposed so now stop digging and take the shame, maybe you should get off of your **** and get a life away from adver comment section, weirdo.[/p][/quote]'Exposed'? No, all that is happened is that you've got something spectacularly wrong and very publically. Well done. You can't simply make a (false) allegation and then waltz off as though you've somehow unearthed some fantastic revelation. Anyone who reads the site regularly will know full well that Trolley Dolly is not the same person as me. I know how much you left-wingers find it difficult to believe that anyone, let alone two or more people, could possibly not share your retarded mindset, but it does actually tend to happen. ChannelX
  • Score: -24

2:15pm Fri 21 Feb 14

house on the hill says...

ChannelX wrote:
It was all absolutely par for the course, lots of lefties saying, 'Yes, of course that needs to be changed... but let's definitely not change it'.

Plenty of day-dream ideas backed up with absolutely no mention of how such things could ever be made to work in reality.

It's as if some people think there's limitless money to be handed out for everything but there are a few Scrooge-like people deliberately making sure it's kept in their bank vault.

Never ceases to amaze me how anti-Capitalist Socialists are the ones who seem to believe most vehemently that more of other people's money is the cure for everything.
Have to agree with that, especially the last paragraph. Too many live in some fantasy where there is some bottomless pit of money to be handed out to those who have chosen not take responsibility for their own lives. Most of it is jealousy of people who have been successful and this "you have more money than I do so you should give some to me" idea that so many seem to have, especially the left. As if they are going to be the answer to the Councils problems by getting voted back in after last time. Madness
[quote][p][bold]ChannelX[/bold] wrote: It was all absolutely par for the course, lots of lefties saying, 'Yes, of course that needs to be changed... but let's definitely not change it'. Plenty of day-dream ideas backed up with absolutely no mention of how such things could ever be made to work in reality. It's as if some people think there's limitless money to be handed out for everything but there are a few Scrooge-like people deliberately making sure it's kept in their bank vault. Never ceases to amaze me how anti-Capitalist Socialists are the ones who seem to believe most vehemently that more of other people's money is the cure for everything.[/p][/quote]Have to agree with that, especially the last paragraph. Too many live in some fantasy where there is some bottomless pit of money to be handed out to those who have chosen not take responsibility for their own lives. Most of it is jealousy of people who have been successful and this "you have more money than I do so you should give some to me" idea that so many seem to have, especially the left. As if they are going to be the answer to the Councils problems by getting voted back in after last time. Madness house on the hill
  • Score: -11

2:41pm Fri 21 Feb 14

Big Time says...

ChannelX wrote:
Big Time wrote:
ChаnnelX wrote:
Big Time wrote:
trolley dolley & ChannelX = same person, very sad individual
Typical paranoid lefty, very sad individual.
anyone in any doubt just look back over trolley dolley & ChannelX comments and the style and content used in both, and this will confirm they are the same poster.

You have been exposed so now stop digging and take the shame, maybe you should get off of your **** and get a life away from adver comment section, weirdo.
'Exposed'?

No, all that is happened is that you've got something spectacularly wrong and very publically.

Well done.

You can't simply make a (false) allegation and then waltz off as though you've somehow unearthed some fantastic revelation.

Anyone who reads the site regularly will know full well that Trolley Dolly is not the same person as me.

I know how much you left-wingers find it difficult to believe that anyone, let alone two or more people, could possibly not share your retarded mindset, but it does actually tend to happen.
The 'lady' doth protest too much

It's unlikely that someone who spends so much time writing such long winded constant drivel has a job, your a loser who is sat at home trying to give yourself a feeling of self importance while the rest of the world is getting on, your a very sad person.
[quote][p][bold]ChannelX[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Big Time[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]ChаnnelX[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Big Time[/bold] wrote: trolley dolley & ChannelX = same person, very sad individual[/p][/quote]Typical paranoid lefty, very sad individual.[/p][/quote]anyone in any doubt just look back over trolley dolley & ChannelX comments and the style and content used in both, and this will confirm they are the same poster. You have been exposed so now stop digging and take the shame, maybe you should get off of your **** and get a life away from adver comment section, weirdo.[/p][/quote]'Exposed'? No, all that is happened is that you've got something spectacularly wrong and very publically. Well done. You can't simply make a (false) allegation and then waltz off as though you've somehow unearthed some fantastic revelation. Anyone who reads the site regularly will know full well that Trolley Dolly is not the same person as me. I know how much you left-wingers find it difficult to believe that anyone, let alone two or more people, could possibly not share your retarded mindset, but it does actually tend to happen.[/p][/quote]The 'lady' doth protest too much It's unlikely that someone who spends so much time writing such long winded constant drivel has a job, your a loser who is sat at home trying to give yourself a feeling of self importance while the rest of the world is getting on, your a very sad person. Big Time
  • Score: 10

3:57pm Fri 21 Feb 14

house on the hill says...

And you of course are not!
And you of course are not! house on the hill
  • Score: -9

4:20pm Fri 21 Feb 14

Big Time says...

No I'm not as I read the adver news website a few times a day to keep up, and I only post a comment on a article about once a week or so if I want to add something, as I actually have a life away from the comment section unlike the trolley dolley / ChannelX
No I'm not as I read the adver news website a few times a day to keep up, and I only post a comment on a article about once a week or so if I want to add something, as I actually have a life away from the comment section unlike the trolley dolley / ChannelX Big Time
  • Score: 5

4:31pm Fri 21 Feb 14

House with no name says...

I cannot believe the audience was representative of the all people who live in Swindon - I noted many appeared to be activists.
As for the women on the panel all they wanted to do was to bully and shout over their fellow panellists to force over their points with a strong selfish feminist agenda.
The mouthy woman in the red dress was particularly annoying and typical of Labour wannabe MP's that always need to shout the loudest to score political points in an attempt to belittle their opponents - some may even call it bullying tactics !
By the way I have no particular political views but do I resent political point scoring whilst side stepping direct answers to the question being asked.
I cannot believe the audience was representative of the all people who live in Swindon - I noted many appeared to be activists. As for the women on the panel all they wanted to do was to bully and shout over their fellow panellists to force over their points with a strong selfish feminist agenda. The mouthy woman in the red dress was particularly annoying and typical of Labour wannabe MP's that always need to shout the loudest to score political points in an attempt to belittle their opponents - some may even call it bullying tactics ! By the way I have no particular political views but do I resent political point scoring whilst side stepping direct answers to the question being asked. House with no name
  • Score: -4

5:04pm Fri 21 Feb 14

Davey Gravey says...

There was no bias. Liz Kendall just talked sense.
There was no bias. Liz Kendall just talked sense. Davey Gravey
  • Score: 0

5:38pm Fri 21 Feb 14

RichardR1 says...

Liz Kendall didn't talk sense she talked the party line, she was like most of the current bunch politicians, probably never had a real job. Straight from Uni into a research job.

I note the voting trolls have been at it again. All left wing stuff, all well argued other, bad, Just like the programme.
Liz Kendall didn't talk sense she talked the party line, she was like most of the current bunch politicians, probably never had a real job. Straight from Uni into a research job. I note the voting trolls have been at it again. All left wing stuff, all well argued other, bad, Just like the programme. RichardR1
  • Score: -1

6:25pm Fri 21 Feb 14

PJC says...

For crying out loud, can all the back-biters just shut the hell up?! Have a debate, but don't give me RSI having to scroll through all the inane arguments to try and find anything informative. Get a grip, people.......
For crying out loud, can all the back-biters just shut the hell up?! Have a debate, but don't give me RSI having to scroll through all the inane arguments to try and find anything informative. Get a grip, people....... PJC
  • Score: 9

7:29pm Fri 21 Feb 14

House with no name says...

Davey Gravey wrote:
There was no bias. Liz Kendall just talked sense.
Mouthy woman over talked her fellow panellists in the most bullish and feminist of ways - talked only the Labour party line and was full of her own (un) importance - A typical wannabe
[quote][p][bold]Davey Gravey[/bold] wrote: There was no bias. Liz Kendall just talked sense.[/p][/quote]Mouthy woman over talked her fellow panellists in the most bullish and feminist of ways - talked only the Labour party line and was full of her own (un) importance - A typical wannabe House with no name
  • Score: -1

7:53pm Fri 21 Feb 14

Davey Gravey says...

Towing the party line or not, still the best speaker in the programme.
Poor old Bobby Martinez bitter ukip are a laughing stock.
Towing the party line or not, still the best speaker in the programme. Poor old Bobby Martinez bitter ukip are a laughing stock. Davey Gravey
  • Score: -2

7:59pm Fri 21 Feb 14

House with no name says...

Oh you mean pulling the party along ?
Oh you mean pulling the party along ? House with no name
  • Score: -2

8:22pm Fri 21 Feb 14

Brainy_G93 says...

Why does the Adver say that this was the first time Question Time has come to Swindon? I remember it being recorded from the Haydon Centre a few years ago.
Why does the Adver say that this was the first time Question Time has come to Swindon? I remember it being recorded from the Haydon Centre a few years ago. Brainy_G93
  • Score: 1

9:23pm Fri 21 Feb 14

Eastern Badger says...

It was interesting and not mentioned above Swindon made the national news for seeking to build 8,000 homes on an area of land which is largely flood plain - very topical and it created some debate. Which has to be good if anyone listens.
It was interesting and not mentioned above Swindon made the national news for seeking to build 8,000 homes on an area of land which is largely flood plain - very topical and it created some debate. Which has to be good if anyone listens. Eastern Badger
  • Score: 0

9:34am Sat 22 Feb 14

ChannelX says...

Davey Gravey wrote:
There was no bias. Liz Kendall just talked sense.
Said the person who doesn't vote Labour, doesn't support Labour and never posts left-wing opinions.
[quote][p][bold]Davey Gravey[/bold] wrote: There was no bias. Liz Kendall just talked sense.[/p][/quote]Said the person who doesn't vote Labour, doesn't support Labour and never posts left-wing opinions. ChannelX
  • Score: -7

9:35am Sat 22 Feb 14

ChannelX says...

Big Time wrote:
ChannelX wrote:
Big Time wrote:
ChаnnelX wrote:
Big Time wrote:
trolley dolley & ChannelX = same person, very sad individual
Typical paranoid lefty, very sad individual.
anyone in any doubt just look back over trolley dolley & ChannelX comments and the style and content used in both, and this will confirm they are the same poster.

You have been exposed so now stop digging and take the shame, maybe you should get off of your **** and get a life away from adver comment section, weirdo.
'Exposed'?

No, all that is happened is that you've got something spectacularly wrong and very publically.

Well done.

You can't simply make a (false) allegation and then waltz off as though you've somehow unearthed some fantastic revelation.

Anyone who reads the site regularly will know full well that Trolley Dolly is not the same person as me.

I know how much you left-wingers find it difficult to believe that anyone, let alone two or more people, could possibly not share your retarded mindset, but it does actually tend to happen.
The 'lady' doth protest too much

It's unlikely that someone who spends so much time writing such long winded constant drivel has a job, your a loser who is sat at home trying to give yourself a feeling of self importance while the rest of the world is getting on, your a very sad person.
Nah, it's just morons such as yourself who keep repeating the same old erronous lies too much.
[quote][p][bold]Big Time[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]ChannelX[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Big Time[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]ChаnnelX[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Big Time[/bold] wrote: trolley dolley & ChannelX = same person, very sad individual[/p][/quote]Typical paranoid lefty, very sad individual.[/p][/quote]anyone in any doubt just look back over trolley dolley & ChannelX comments and the style and content used in both, and this will confirm they are the same poster. You have been exposed so now stop digging and take the shame, maybe you should get off of your **** and get a life away from adver comment section, weirdo.[/p][/quote]'Exposed'? No, all that is happened is that you've got something spectacularly wrong and very publically. Well done. You can't simply make a (false) allegation and then waltz off as though you've somehow unearthed some fantastic revelation. Anyone who reads the site regularly will know full well that Trolley Dolly is not the same person as me. I know how much you left-wingers find it difficult to believe that anyone, let alone two or more people, could possibly not share your retarded mindset, but it does actually tend to happen.[/p][/quote]The 'lady' doth protest too much It's unlikely that someone who spends so much time writing such long winded constant drivel has a job, your a loser who is sat at home trying to give yourself a feeling of self importance while the rest of the world is getting on, your a very sad person.[/p][/quote]Nah, it's just morons such as yourself who keep repeating the same old erronous lies too much. ChannelX
  • Score: -7

10:40am Sat 22 Feb 14

ChаnnelX says...

Sorry, that should read 'erroneous'
Sorry, that should read 'erroneous' ChаnnelX
  • Score: -6

11:46am Sat 22 Feb 14

ChannelX says...

ChаnnelX wrote:
Sorry, that should read 'erroneous'
Thanks for correcting me.
[quote][p][bold]ChаnnelX[/bold] wrote: Sorry, that should read 'erroneous'[/p][/quote]Thanks for correcting me. ChannelX
  • Score: -3

2:20pm Sat 22 Feb 14

ChаnnelX says...

ChannelX wrote:
ChаnnelX wrote:
Sorry, that should read 'erroneous'
Thanks for correcting me.
Avec plaisir.
[quote][p][bold]ChannelX[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]ChаnnelX[/bold] wrote: Sorry, that should read 'erroneous'[/p][/quote]Thanks for correcting me.[/p][/quote]Avec plaisir. ChаnnelX
  • Score: -4

4:05pm Sat 22 Feb 14

Davey Gravey says...

ChannelX wrote:
Davey Gravey wrote:
There was no bias. Liz Kendall just talked sense.
Said the person who doesn't vote Labour, doesn't support Labour and never posts left-wing opinions.
Quite right on all counts. Well done.
If liz Kendall was a Tory I would still have said she came across the best. She isn't though and Tories never come across well.
[quote][p][bold]ChannelX[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Davey Gravey[/bold] wrote: There was no bias. Liz Kendall just talked sense.[/p][/quote]Said the person who doesn't vote Labour, doesn't support Labour and never posts left-wing opinions.[/p][/quote]Quite right on all counts. Well done. If liz Kendall was a Tory I would still have said she came across the best. She isn't though and Tories never come across well. Davey Gravey
  • Score: -2

4:41pm Sat 22 Feb 14

thrugelmir says...

"Jeanette Winterson"

What a waste of air time letting this individual speak.............
"Jeanette Winterson" What a waste of air time letting this individual speak............. thrugelmir
  • Score: 0

4:56pm Sat 22 Feb 14

house on the hill says...

ChannelX wrote:
Big Time wrote:
ChannelX wrote:
Big Time wrote:
ChаnnelX wrote:
Big Time wrote:
trolley dolley & ChannelX = same person, very sad individual
Typical paranoid lefty, very sad individual.
anyone in any doubt just look back over trolley dolley & ChannelX comments and the style and content used in both, and this will confirm they are the same poster.

You have been exposed so now stop digging and take the shame, maybe you should get off of your **** and get a life away from adver comment section, weirdo.
'Exposed'?

No, all that is happened is that you've got something spectacularly wrong and very publically.

Well done.

You can't simply make a (false) allegation and then waltz off as though you've somehow unearthed some fantastic revelation.

Anyone who reads the site regularly will know full well that Trolley Dolly is not the same person as me.

I know how much you left-wingers find it difficult to believe that anyone, let alone two or more people, could possibly not share your retarded mindset, but it does actually tend to happen.
The 'lady' doth protest too much

It's unlikely that someone who spends so much time writing such long winded constant drivel has a job, your a loser who is sat at home trying to give yourself a feeling of self importance while the rest of the world is getting on, your a very sad person.
Nah, it's just morons such as yourself who keep repeating the same old erronous lies too much.
I also think that anyone who posts things like "look back at posters comments" or "the style and content used in both" is at best scarily anal and at worst bordering on stalking. If you really have the time to do all that, you clearly have far too much time on your hands.
Personally i don't care how many log ins people have, just treat them each on their merits and move on. Jeez!
[quote][p][bold]ChannelX[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Big Time[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]ChannelX[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Big Time[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]ChаnnelX[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Big Time[/bold] wrote: trolley dolley & ChannelX = same person, very sad individual[/p][/quote]Typical paranoid lefty, very sad individual.[/p][/quote]anyone in any doubt just look back over trolley dolley & ChannelX comments and the style and content used in both, and this will confirm they are the same poster. You have been exposed so now stop digging and take the shame, maybe you should get off of your **** and get a life away from adver comment section, weirdo.[/p][/quote]'Exposed'? No, all that is happened is that you've got something spectacularly wrong and very publically. Well done. You can't simply make a (false) allegation and then waltz off as though you've somehow unearthed some fantastic revelation. Anyone who reads the site regularly will know full well that Trolley Dolly is not the same person as me. I know how much you left-wingers find it difficult to believe that anyone, let alone two or more people, could possibly not share your retarded mindset, but it does actually tend to happen.[/p][/quote]The 'lady' doth protest too much It's unlikely that someone who spends so much time writing such long winded constant drivel has a job, your a loser who is sat at home trying to give yourself a feeling of self importance while the rest of the world is getting on, your a very sad person.[/p][/quote]Nah, it's just morons such as yourself who keep repeating the same old erronous lies too much.[/p][/quote]I also think that anyone who posts things like "look back at posters comments" or "the style and content used in both" is at best scarily anal and at worst bordering on stalking. If you really have the time to do all that, you clearly have far too much time on your hands. Personally i don't care how many log ins people have, just treat them each on their merits and move on. Jeez! house on the hill
  • Score: 1

5:18pm Sat 22 Feb 14

Always Grumpy says...

Eastern Badger wrote:
It was interesting and not mentioned above Swindon made the national news for seeking to build 8,000 homes on an area of land which is largely flood plain - very topical and it created some debate. Which has to be good if anyone listens.
Would that be yet another of Swindon's many flood plains that haven't actually flooded, despite the wettest winter ever?
[quote][p][bold]Eastern Badger[/bold] wrote: It was interesting and not mentioned above Swindon made the national news for seeking to build 8,000 homes on an area of land which is largely flood plain - very topical and it created some debate. Which has to be good if anyone listens.[/p][/quote]Would that be yet another of Swindon's many flood plains that haven't actually flooded, despite the wettest winter ever? Always Grumpy
  • Score: 4

10:05pm Sat 22 Feb 14

Eastern Badger says...

Always Grumpy wrote:
Eastern Badger wrote:
It was interesting and not mentioned above Swindon made the national news for seeking to build 8,000 homes on an area of land which is largely flood plain - very topical and it created some debate. Which has to be good if anyone listens.
Would that be yet another of Swindon's many flood plains that haven't actually flooded, despite the wettest winter ever?
Yes - many of the fields due for development periodically under water as are the gaps between where the very expensive infrastructure will have to be built. Bear in mind that developers buy farmland because it's traditionally cheap and easy to develop - not because they like a challenge. The Environment Agency are on site at Dorcan Brook every time it rains heavily to stop Covingham (built on a flood plain) flooding - do you think that's free or still paid for by the developer who built the houses in Covingham?
[quote][p][bold]Always Grumpy[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Eastern Badger[/bold] wrote: It was interesting and not mentioned above Swindon made the national news for seeking to build 8,000 homes on an area of land which is largely flood plain - very topical and it created some debate. Which has to be good if anyone listens.[/p][/quote]Would that be yet another of Swindon's many flood plains that haven't actually flooded, despite the wettest winter ever?[/p][/quote]Yes - many of the fields due for development periodically under water as are the gaps between where the very expensive infrastructure will have to be built. Bear in mind that developers buy farmland because it's traditionally cheap and easy to develop - not because they like a challenge. The Environment Agency are on site at Dorcan Brook every time it rains heavily to stop Covingham (built on a flood plain) flooding - do you think that's free or still paid for by the developer who built the houses in Covingham? Eastern Badger
  • Score: 1

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree