News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


Coate protesters prepare for their next battle

The Coate development site with junction 15 of the M4 in the foreground The Coate development site with junction 15 of the M4 in the foreground

THE battle for Coate Water may be over but the war is yet to be won, according to campaigners.

John Denham, the Secretary Of State For Communities And Local Government, yesterday ruled a plan to build 1,800 homes and a university campus near the beauty spot should not go ahead.

Protesters said they will use Mr Denham’s decision to challenge any development on or near Coate — including a Swindon Council plan to build 750 homes at the site.

The council has included a development to the north and east of Day House Lane in its Core Strategy – a planning blueprint for the next 20 years.

The plan shares several aspects with the rejected Swindon Gateway Project project, including a primary school, 5.5 hectares of land for expansion of Great Western Hospital and 15 hectares of employment land.

But the council has referred to the plans as “a much smaller development... protecting the country park with a large buffer.”

Jean Saunders, who has been campaigning against development at Coate for the last six years, said: “I will be reading through the Secretary Of State’s comments to see if there’s anything we can use to challenge the council.

“We don’t trust that the council will keep their promises about retaining the buffer zone between Coate and the proposed development.

“They have broken their promises before – when they allowed the hospital to be built, then said that would be the only development on Coate, then opened the door to the university.

“When the University of Bath didn’t come they then said if there was no university there would be no development.

“No development does not mean less development. Zero means zero.”

Mrs Saunders urged people in the town to air their views on the Core Strategy, which is now undergoing public consultation until September 21.

To get a copy of the strategy and a feedback document go to www.swindon.gov.uk or pick one up at any library or council office.

Coun Peter Greenhalgh, Swindon Council’s lead member for sustainability, transport and strategic planning said the SGP development and the council’s plans were completely different.

He said: “The area to the north of Day House Lane identified in the Core Strategy is far enough away to have a minimal impact.

“The impact of SGP’s proposal would have been measurable.

“We are committed to the buffer zone between the country park and the development and to create as minimal an impact on the area as possible.”

Terry King, of Bankside, in Old Town, has campaigned against large scale development in Swindon, including at Wichelstowe and Coate.

He said: “I would be surprised if the council is allowed to go ahead with this development after the Secretary Of State’s comments.

“This surely puts an end to plans to build anywhere near Coate.”

Developers have not given up building at Coate

THE developers behind the controversial Coate project last night vowed to continue to work with Swindon Council to build on the site — but councillors have other ideas.

A spokesman for SGP said: “While disappointed with the decision, we are pleased that the Secretary Of State has confirmed that this is a sustainable location for development.

“We remain committed to developing a scheme for Swindon Gateway which will still deliver major benefits and at the same time satisfy local planners. We will continue to work with the council to agree an alternative proposal.”

However, Coun Peter Greenhalgh, the cabinet member for sustainability, transport and strategic planning, said: “I would be extremely reluctant to discuss any proposal for that site that they put forward.

“Obviously if they put a planning application in we have to consider it but we have no plans to work with anyone to develop on that site.”

SGP has six weeks to challenge the decision but can only do so on legal grounds.

Comments(8)

pragmatic green says...
10:23pm Thu 6 Aug 09

I heard Jean Saunders on the radio on the way home from work – world class patronising!!
One of her main arguments seemed to be that people would not want to come to Swindon to study, so why build a university. Well that may be the case for some, but a higher education establishment would enhance the town.
The decision not to build it at Coate may well be right, but please don't use the aforementioned view to block any future university development!

Jean Saunders says...
11:07pm Thu 6 Aug 09

pragmatic green - I can assure you that my main argument against the development at Coate was purely on environmental grounds. I have supported a university presence at North Star since it was first proposed in the 30 Year Vision for Swindon. The point I tried to make (perhaps not very well!) was that people from all around the world visit Coate Water and Jefferies Land because the area is unique - it is already an open air university that could be enhanced further.

itsamess says...
11:23pm Thu 6 Aug 09

The inspectors report offers some good advice as to the university--and advice to the Council as to regeneration of the town centre--click the Coate Enquiry news panel and it opens the files of the decisions in full--its very long--but very interesting.

peatmoor pirate says...
9:30am Fri 7 Aug 09

The whole development thing in Swindon is very interested. My natural reaction is to limit building but on the other hand, I live in a house which was built on old farmland so I am not going to be a NIMBY.

What i do think is that the Govt want to load too much of the SW developpment into Swindon and there must be something done about infrastructure etc if this is to happen,

People have to live somewhere and it is all well and good to moan but yoyu cant ignore the fact.

As for people coming from all over the world to visit Richard Jefferies Land, Really? how many? he was hardly Shakespeare was he. Surely it's not beyond the wit of man to preserve his house for posterity with sensible development around it if it is indeed needed?

pragmatic green says...
9:57am Fri 7 Aug 09

Jean Saunders - thank you for taking the time to respond to my earlier post. Let's all hope for a town centre university.

Peter DAY says...
10:18am Fri 7 Aug 09

Instead of all these stupid satelite so say colleges around the town Coate water could have been developed into a beautiful formidable area of which the town would have been proud. Probably some of the council live near there and are afraid maybe of there property going down in value. Coate water itself is filthy and this would have been a lovely way of preserving it for the future of Swindon.

TKD4ever says...
12:33pm Fri 7 Aug 09

Peter DAY wrote:
Instead of all these stupid satelite so say colleges around the town Coate water could have been developed into a beautiful formidable area of which the town would have been proud. Probably some of the council live near there and are afraid maybe of there property going down in value. Coate water itself is filthy and this would have been a lovely way of preserving it for the future of Swindon.
So the way to preserve green fields, trees and lakes, is to build on them. Somehow I don't think you've thought this though.
Surely if the place is filthy then the answer is to clean it up, not build on top of the rubbish, or are you saying that it will only be cleaned up if we then allow a company to build houses all over it?

Bobby Bee says...
4:29pm Fri 7 Aug 09

pragmatic green wrote:
Jean Saunders - thank you for taking the time to respond to my earlier post. Let's all hope for a town centre university.
How pleasant for Jean Saunders to receive a pleasant, apologetic post.
Well done to the writer, pragmatic green, who certainly has manners, somewhat lacking on some of these threads.

click2find

Most popular


About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree