News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


Council tax set to rise by 1.8 per cent

TAXPAYERS in Swindon could see their council tax rise by 1.8 per cent if cabinet proposals are passed in two weeks’ time.

The level of increase for 2010/2011 was announced at last night’s cabinet meeting at the civic offices and will be put to full cabinet on February 22.

This compares to a 3.5 per cent rise in 2009/2010.

At the meeting, Conservative councillors outlined the pressures they had been under to ensure the level balanced out demand to deliver services with a reasonable tax on the people in the current economic climate.

However, the budgeting for services like adult social care was described as a high risk strategy by opposition leader Coun Derique Montaut.

Leader of the council Rod Bluh said, in light of many residents losing their jobs, the council did not to make financial “pressures any more burdensome than they already are.

“We want to have a rate of council tax as low as we can get it.”

Coun Mark Edwards, cabinet member for finance and benefits, said the budget had been hampered by increasing demands in areas like adult social care and by a lowering of people’s income in the economic downturn.

He said if the council had sat back and not acted on these pressures, council tax could have risen by 15 per cent.

Earlier in the evening it was pointed out that adult social care would become a growing issue as people lived longer and the complexity of their needs increased with conditions like dementia.

Coun Edwards said: “We have to balance the needs of services with the costs of providing them.

“We have mitigated most of the impact for most of the services.

“I’m confident that what we have is a robust budget that will deliver for the people of Swindon whilst we continue to be sensitive to the most vulnerable in society in areas like adult social care.”

Councillor Nick Martin questioned how the decrease in predicted spending in the house and social care bracket from £48,600,000 in 2009 to 2010 to this year’ budget of £47,156,000 was being achieved.

Coun Mark Edwards said adult social care was a complex area with many uncertainties about the future demands on the service.

He said: “We believe this year will deliver the robust savings programmes we haven’t been delivering in the past.”

Coun Bluh said to have managed an affordable council tax increase in such difficult circumstances was a massive achievement for the council.

“It’s the sort of commitment that will be needed next year and the year after to keep making sure we come in with the best possible result we can achieve.”

Coun Derique said after the meeting: “This is an accounting exercise that they have gone through.

“It’s a high risk that could affect the most vulnerable in our society.”

Comments(10)

Rusty23 says...
9:47pm Wed 10 Feb 10

Well - if Montaut and his dreadful Labour government gave the people of Swindon a decent formula grant then the Council wouldn't have to take any risks.

reality_check says...
9:51pm Wed 10 Feb 10

Nothing less than a zero percent increase this year will win any support from the people of Swindon. The Conservatives should understand this and act accordingly.

Robh says...
10:00pm Wed 10 Feb 10

Why do Labour always expect council tax to always go up far greater than inflation. It happened when they were in control but why.

What extras are needed this year and why must we have cuts? The fact is that I cannot afford more than the rate of inflation so the council will just have to make sure that the various departments work within their finances. I suspect that many of the increases are needed because of pure incompetence. It makes you wonder how these people manage their home finances or are many of these managers the ones filing for bankruptcy and IVA's.

Itssomewheretowork says...
10:06pm Wed 10 Feb 10

"Nothing less than a zero percent increase this year will win any support from the people of Swindon. The Conservatives should understand this and act accordingly"

Reality+check wrote.


I for one would not support a zero percent increase if it means even bigger cuts than planned. 1.8% sounds pretty good to me, especially when I received my house insurance renewal today with an 8.5% increase

Swindon born n bred says...
1:51am Thu 11 Feb 10

I wonder how many employees the council has and I wonder what they all do. Birmingham City Council is planing on making up to 2,000 staff redundant which equals 5% of their staff. That means they employ 80,000 people. What do they all do?

They serve a population of 2.3m which means there is currently 1 councilor per 29 people.

184,000 live in Swindon borough so, pro rating the calculation suggests Swindon could have 6,400. If they have more than this, I think numbers could be reduced - be interesting to
know.

With an average UK salary of c£25k a 5% cut in staff could save £800,000 in salaries alone, more if managers and above were thinned out

I know that this is just playing with theoretical numbers, but it does highlight interesting figures

Sparky99 says...
7:51am Thu 11 Feb 10

1.8 per cent sounds good to me. Inflation is running higher than that. However.... I seem to remember the adult social care budget was overspent by just about the whole SBC eficit figure last year That was with a tax rise of nearly 4 per cent. Assuming the same person is in charge (I haven't heard anything to the contrary), is there a good chance it will go overspent again?

Terence says...
9:40am Thu 11 Feb 10

Swindon born n bred wrote:
I wonder how many employees the council has and I wonder what they all do. Birmingham City Council is planing on making up to 2,000 staff redundant which equals 5% of their staff. That means they employ 80,000 people. What do they all do?

They serve a population of 2.3m which means there is currently 1 councilor per 29 people.

184,000 live in Swindon borough so, pro rating the calculation suggests Swindon could have 6,400. If they have more than this, I think numbers could be reduced - be interesting to
know.

With an average UK salary of c£25k a 5% cut in staff could save £800,000 in salaries alone, more if managers and above were thinned out

I know that this is just playing with theoretical numbers, but it does highlight interesting figures
I believe your initial calculation is incorrect. If 2000 is 5% of total staff, total staff would be 40,000.

trustnopolitician says...
11:09am Thu 11 Feb 10

Whatever the political party in power the ruling political party will always act in its own interests before those of taxpayers and the community as a whole.

Clearly inefficiency must be eliminated but it needs to be done across the board. We should only spent what wev'e got like any household.

There are areas of the council which are clearly overstaffed and/or carrying out uneccessary tasks.

An independent look at this ( not by consultants!!) but by an unpaid representative selection on non political taxpayers would reveal many areas where council tax revenue is wated.

I know its a bit of a hobby horse with me but don't we pay councillors far too much for what they do.?

Haven't we got far too many employees of the council receiving salaries which are quite out of keeping with the job done and the state of the borough's finances.

Cut the Councillors allowance to (say) 10% of the current amounts and save half a million straight away.

Incidentally are council employees under threat of dismissal if they speak about the remuneration review which is currently going on ?.

As I understand it the review only applies to lower paid people. In other word the highly paid and councillors are fireproof

trustnopolitician says...
11:12am Thu 11 Feb 10

I got carried away - wated should of course be wasted !

railman16650 says...
5:54pm Thu 11 Feb 10

TAXPAYERS in Swindon could see their council tax rise by 1.8 per cent if cabinet proposals are passed in two weeks’ time. ...


What's this "if" business then ?

click2find

Most popular


About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree