News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


Graffiti walls are not wanted here

THE idea of having a graffiti wall in Highworth has been scrapped at the first possible opportunity by the town council.

Coun Richard Williams brought the proposal before the council on Tuesday night, saying it was a way of keeping young people entertained and would prevent graffiti elsewhere.

But councillors on the leisure committee voted against the idea to proceed with a feasibility study into graffiti walls, with seven councillors voting against the plan.

Coun Williams said: “Graffiti is not a problem in Highworth but graffiti seems to be a way for young people to express themselves these days. This is just an idea – there is no guarantee it will happen but we are talking about it.

“The idea is to provide a dedicated wall where young people will be able to express themselves in a controlled manner.

“I know there are some in Swindon already and I have been told it has made some difference to bringing down graffiti in those areas.”

The walls have also been proposed by other parish council, such as Stratton, but have met strong opposition from one of the town’s MPs.

Swindon north MP Justin Tomlinson said: “I am utterly opposed to this scheme and have tried my best to convince the Parish to not proceed with this project.

“Swindon Council tried and failed with a similar scheme in 2001 at Mannington and the whole surrounding area became a haven for graffiti and tagging.

“This will be a disaster and it will be hated by local residents.”

Graffiti walls have been used at places like Toothill and Mannington and a special project has been running in Penhill with young people having the chance to create a community mural with graffiti.

Positive Futures co-ordinator Mark Stennett said: “I believe that graffiti is a misunderstood art form and if it is used in the correct way it is a good way for younger people to express themselves.

“Having these graffiti walls is a great way of introducing children to the art form and getting them away from tagging and vandalism as long as they are monitored.

“As well as children expressing themselves, we do try and get the children thinking creatively about what they are drawing and link it to the community, bringing a new art form which really has been around for years.”

Comments(4)

robertfm says...
12:42pm Sat 5 Nov 11

I agree with Justin, if you legitimise criminal damage, then some will never see what's alright in one place is not in another.

Wellfire says...
2:50pm Sat 5 Nov 11

Around here - I won't say where that is for obvious reasons - there was a wall which for years was plagued by graffiti. A couple of years ago the council painted it and installed a cctv camera nearby. There has been no graffiti there since.

Graffiti is nothing more than the scribbling that most kids grow out of at an early age. It should not be encouraged.

Malkym says...
5:12pm Mon 7 Nov 11

Excrement news! -oops I mean Excellent -well you can understand my confusion most graffiti is a pile of ,,manure!

T-Wells says...
12:28pm Wed 16 Nov 11

Interesting. There is a distinct difference between graffiti 'art' and tagging, though both amount to criminal damage or vandalism when expressed in unwanted locations. We have considered the pros and cons of graffiti walls down here in Tunbridge Wells but we've never gone beyond the 'consideration' stage.

A personal opinion:

Unless there's a specific art project I don't see any value in it.

It would legitimise the carrying of graffiti pens, paint, and other equipment and provide people with an excuse that they were on their way to the wall.

It's a tricky subject, but I think the right result was reached.

T

click2find

Most popular


About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree