Oh dear, Steve Nibbs, so wrong, once again I’m afraid.

In your reply (SA, October 6) you state that I’ve twisted your words to become a “victim”.

I’m afraid not, I simply responded to the words that you wrote, the same way that other people respond to you, or do you write your letters with your eyes closed as well as your mind?

To answer your original question about my Christian friends, how do you know they haven’t responded to you, but in your usual way you’ve dismissed their opinions as wrong because they disagree with yours.

In one of your replies to Sue Hammond you state that she “is not a Christian, but posing as one to entrap and humiliate you”.

Why would anyone try to humiliate you when you do such a good job of it all by yourself?

This seems to be your standard answer, that a person cannot be a proper Christian if their views go against yours.

But then you cover yourself by saying they’re not your views but the view of the Bible. You seem incapable of original thought if that’s the case.

And once again you make the claim that I’m bluffing. I ask again, why would I need to bluff you?

I don’t know you personally and you’re not important enough in my life that I would need to bluff you just to prove a point.

Don’t misunderstand me, I quite enjoy reading your letters — I find them amusing, rude and misinformed definitely, but amusing.

What I find most amazing is that I’ve yet to read a letter in support of you or your views.

Why do you think that is? There’s plenty from those who disagree with you, but then, we’re probably all wrong aren’t we?

I will say one last thing to you; just read Matthew 7:1-3 KJV, because it’s a pity that closed minds don’t come with closed mouths.

D Cottrell Hornbeam Court Swindon